Cargando…

Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures

Background. In recent years, complete denture construction has been revolutionized using computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology. This clinical study compared the retention and denture base adaptation of 3D-printed complete dentures fabricated using dimethacryl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal, Shady, Mohamed, Alnajih, Mahmoud Almabrouk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704186
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.030
_version_ 1784877110680092672
author Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal
Shady, Mohamed
Alnajih, Mahmoud Almabrouk
author_facet Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal
Shady, Mohamed
Alnajih, Mahmoud Almabrouk
author_sort Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal
collection PubMed
description Background. In recent years, complete denture construction has been revolutionized using computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology. This clinical study compared the retention and denture base adaptation of 3D-printed complete dentures fabricated using dimethacrylate-based resins with a photoinitiator versus conventional complete dentures. Methods. Ten completely edentulous patients were nominated for this study. Each patient received two complete dentures. One complete denture was conventionally fabricated, while the other was digitally fabricated through 3D printing of dimethacrylate-based resins with a photoinitiator. Denture base adaptation for both dentures was evaluated using surface matching software. Denture retention was also evaluated using a digital force meter at the time of complete denture insertion (T(0) ), after three months (T(3) ) and six months (T(6) ) of denture use. Results. Regarding adaptation (mean misfit values), a statistically insignificant difference was detected between the two differently fabricated complete dentures. In addition, comparable satisfactory retention values were observed for both conventionally fabricated and 3D-printed dentures; however, there was an insignificant increase in retention over time. Conclusion. 3D-printed complete dentures fabricated using dimethacrylate-based resins could be a promising alternative to conventionally fabricated complete dentures with satisfactory denture base adaptation and retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98711752023-01-25 Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal Shady, Mohamed Alnajih, Mahmoud Almabrouk J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. In recent years, complete denture construction has been revolutionized using computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology. This clinical study compared the retention and denture base adaptation of 3D-printed complete dentures fabricated using dimethacrylate-based resins with a photoinitiator versus conventional complete dentures. Methods. Ten completely edentulous patients were nominated for this study. Each patient received two complete dentures. One complete denture was conventionally fabricated, while the other was digitally fabricated through 3D printing of dimethacrylate-based resins with a photoinitiator. Denture base adaptation for both dentures was evaluated using surface matching software. Denture retention was also evaluated using a digital force meter at the time of complete denture insertion (T(0) ), after three months (T(3) ) and six months (T(6) ) of denture use. Results. Regarding adaptation (mean misfit values), a statistically insignificant difference was detected between the two differently fabricated complete dentures. In addition, comparable satisfactory retention values were observed for both conventionally fabricated and 3D-printed dentures; however, there was an insignificant increase in retention over time. Conclusion. 3D-printed complete dentures fabricated using dimethacrylate-based resins could be a promising alternative to conventionally fabricated complete dentures with satisfactory denture base adaptation and retention. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9871175/ /pubmed/36704186 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.030 Text en ©2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Emera, Radwa Mohsen Kamal
Shady, Mohamed
Alnajih, Mahmoud Almabrouk
Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title_full Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title_fullStr Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title_short Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures
title_sort comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3d-printed complete dentures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704186
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.030
work_keys_str_mv AT emeraradwamohsenkamal comparisonofretentionanddenturebaseadaptationbetweenconventionaland3dprintedcompletedentures
AT shadymohamed comparisonofretentionanddenturebaseadaptationbetweenconventionaland3dprintedcompletedentures
AT alnajihmahmoudalmabrouk comparisonofretentionanddenturebaseadaptationbetweenconventionaland3dprintedcompletedentures