Cargando…

Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study

Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaziri, Farzane, Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh, Arab Farashahi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714085
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022
_version_ 1784877111175020544
author Vaziri, Farzane
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
Arab Farashahi, Mohammad
author_facet Vaziri, Farzane
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
Arab Farashahi, Mohammad
author_sort Vaziri, Farzane
collection PubMed
description Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of hand and ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments on the roughness of dental surfaces under an atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods. In this study, 35 periodontally hopeless teeth were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=7). The control group consisted of teeth that had to be extracted for orthodontic or prosthetic treatment (n=7). In group one, scaling and root planing were performed using hand instruments. In other groups, scaling and root planing were performed using piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments with low to high power, respectively. Then the scaled teeth were extracted for analysis under an atomic force microscope. Results. This study showed that root roughness significantly differed between different experimental groups (P<0.027). The root roughness (Rq) in the SRP2 group significantly differed from the control group (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Furthermore, the least roughness was observed in the SRP3 group, with the highest roughness in the SRP2 group. Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, there were no significant differences in surface roughness between different powers of the ultrasonic device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98711772023-01-26 Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study Vaziri, Farzane Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Arab Farashahi, Mohammad J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent Research Article Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of hand and ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments on the roughness of dental surfaces under an atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods. In this study, 35 periodontally hopeless teeth were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=7). The control group consisted of teeth that had to be extracted for orthodontic or prosthetic treatment (n=7). In group one, scaling and root planing were performed using hand instruments. In other groups, scaling and root planing were performed using piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments with low to high power, respectively. Then the scaled teeth were extracted for analysis under an atomic force microscope. Results. This study showed that root roughness significantly differed between different experimental groups (P<0.027). The root roughness (Rq) in the SRP2 group significantly differed from the control group (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Furthermore, the least roughness was observed in the SRP3 group, with the highest roughness in the SRP2 group. Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, there were no significant differences in surface roughness between different powers of the ultrasonic device. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9871177/ /pubmed/36714085 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vaziri, Farzane
Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh
Arab Farashahi, Mohammad
Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title_full Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title_fullStr Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title_short Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
title_sort evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714085
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022
work_keys_str_mv AT vazirifarzane evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy
AT rashidimaybodifahimeh evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy
AT arabfarashahimohammad evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy