Cargando…
Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study
Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714085 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022 |
_version_ | 1784877111175020544 |
---|---|
author | Vaziri, Farzane Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Arab Farashahi, Mohammad |
author_facet | Vaziri, Farzane Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Arab Farashahi, Mohammad |
author_sort | Vaziri, Farzane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of hand and ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments on the roughness of dental surfaces under an atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods. In this study, 35 periodontally hopeless teeth were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=7). The control group consisted of teeth that had to be extracted for orthodontic or prosthetic treatment (n=7). In group one, scaling and root planing were performed using hand instruments. In other groups, scaling and root planing were performed using piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments with low to high power, respectively. Then the scaled teeth were extracted for analysis under an atomic force microscope. Results. This study showed that root roughness significantly differed between different experimental groups (P<0.027). The root roughness (Rq) in the SRP2 group significantly differed from the control group (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Furthermore, the least roughness was observed in the SRP3 group, with the highest roughness in the SRP2 group. Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, there were no significant differences in surface roughness between different powers of the ultrasonic device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9871177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98711772023-01-26 Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study Vaziri, Farzane Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Arab Farashahi, Mohammad J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent Research Article Background. The aim of periodontal treatment is to remove bacterial plaque and dental calculus by hand and power-driven instruments. However, the comparison of the effectiveness of these instruments has always been controversial. Therefore, this in vivo study investigated and compared the effects of hand and ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments on the roughness of dental surfaces under an atomic force microscope (AFM). Methods. In this study, 35 periodontally hopeless teeth were selected and randomly divided into four groups (n=7). The control group consisted of teeth that had to be extracted for orthodontic or prosthetic treatment (n=7). In group one, scaling and root planing were performed using hand instruments. In other groups, scaling and root planing were performed using piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments with low to high power, respectively. Then the scaled teeth were extracted for analysis under an atomic force microscope. Results. This study showed that root roughness significantly differed between different experimental groups (P<0.027). The root roughness (Rq) in the SRP2 group significantly differed from the control group (P<0.05), while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Furthermore, the least roughness was observed in the SRP3 group, with the highest roughness in the SRP2 group. Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, there were no significant differences in surface roughness between different powers of the ultrasonic device. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9871177/ /pubmed/36714085 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vaziri, Farzane Rashidi Maybodi, Fahimeh Arab Farashahi, Mohammad Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title | Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title_full | Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title_short | Evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study |
title_sort | evaluation of root surface roughness produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714085 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazirifarzane evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy AT rashidimaybodifahimeh evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy AT arabfarashahimohammad evaluationofrootsurfaceroughnessproducedbyhandinstrumentsandultrasonicscalersaninvivostudy |