Cargando…

Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial

Background. A decrease in the width and height of the alveolar ridge is inevitable following tooth extraction. This study aimed to histologically evaluate the amount of newly formed bone after using a freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) at two different intervals in the tooth socket grafting. Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moghaddas, Omid, Naddafpour, Nima, Farhadi, Sareh, Nikookar, Peyman, Khandan, Sephora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714084
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.020
_version_ 1784877111405707264
author Moghaddas, Omid
Naddafpour, Nima
Farhadi, Sareh
Nikookar, Peyman
Khandan, Sephora
author_facet Moghaddas, Omid
Naddafpour, Nima
Farhadi, Sareh
Nikookar, Peyman
Khandan, Sephora
author_sort Moghaddas, Omid
collection PubMed
description Background. A decrease in the width and height of the alveolar ridge is inevitable following tooth extraction. This study aimed to histologically evaluate the amount of newly formed bone after using a freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) at two different intervals in the tooth socket grafting. Methods. Forty patients were selected, who required a single-rooted tooth extraction and were candidates for implant placement, with no indication for an immediate implant. Extraction sockets were preserved using a cortical FDBA allograft in two regeneration interval groups: 3 months (group A) and 4 months (group B). At the time of implant placement, a bone sample was collected from each grafted socket. Histomorphometric analyses were performed to determine the percentage of newly formed bone and the residual graft material. Changes in histological indices, i.e., inflammation rate, percentage of ossification, and the amount of remaining biomaterial, were evaluated. Results. There were no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone and residual graft material between the two groups. In general, the average of new bone formation and remaining graft particles in groups A and B was: %33.89 and %12.59 vs. %39.83 and %14.07, respectively. Conclusion. Bone parameters in group A were better compared to group B. However, due to the lack of significant differences in the results, it is suggested that implant placement in grafted sockets with mineralized allografts be expedited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98711782023-01-26 Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial Moghaddas, Omid Naddafpour, Nima Farhadi, Sareh Nikookar, Peyman Khandan, Sephora J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent Research Article Background. A decrease in the width and height of the alveolar ridge is inevitable following tooth extraction. This study aimed to histologically evaluate the amount of newly formed bone after using a freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) at two different intervals in the tooth socket grafting. Methods. Forty patients were selected, who required a single-rooted tooth extraction and were candidates for implant placement, with no indication for an immediate implant. Extraction sockets were preserved using a cortical FDBA allograft in two regeneration interval groups: 3 months (group A) and 4 months (group B). At the time of implant placement, a bone sample was collected from each grafted socket. Histomorphometric analyses were performed to determine the percentage of newly formed bone and the residual graft material. Changes in histological indices, i.e., inflammation rate, percentage of ossification, and the amount of remaining biomaterial, were evaluated. Results. There were no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone and residual graft material between the two groups. In general, the average of new bone formation and remaining graft particles in groups A and B was: %33.89 and %12.59 vs. %39.83 and %14.07, respectively. Conclusion. Bone parameters in group A were better compared to group B. However, due to the lack of significant differences in the results, it is suggested that implant placement in grafted sockets with mineralized allografts be expedited. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9871178/ /pubmed/36714084 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.020 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moghaddas, Omid
Naddafpour, Nima
Farhadi, Sareh
Nikookar, Peyman
Khandan, Sephora
Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:A randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison of healing time and the histopathology of bone formation following tooth extraction using freeze-dried bone allograft:a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714084
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/japid.2022.020
work_keys_str_mv AT moghaddasomid comparisonofhealingtimeandthehistopathologyofboneformationfollowingtoothextractionusingfreezedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT naddafpournima comparisonofhealingtimeandthehistopathologyofboneformationfollowingtoothextractionusingfreezedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT farhadisareh comparisonofhealingtimeandthehistopathologyofboneformationfollowingtoothextractionusingfreezedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT nikookarpeyman comparisonofhealingtimeandthehistopathologyofboneformationfollowingtoothextractionusingfreezedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT khandansephora comparisonofhealingtimeandthehistopathologyofboneformationfollowingtoothextractionusingfreezedriedboneallograftarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial