Cargando…

Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department

OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is an opportune venue to screen for unmet social needs and connect patients with social services. This quality improvement study incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data to examine unmet social needs among ED patients and program implementation. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loo, Stephanie, Anderson, Emily, Lin, Jessica G., Smith, Perri, Murray, Genevra F., Hong, Haeyeon, Jacquet, Gabrielle A., Koul, Rashmi, Rosenmoss, Sophie, James, Thea, Shankar, Kalpana Narayan, de la Vega, Pablo Buitron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12883
_version_ 1784877165133692928
author Loo, Stephanie
Anderson, Emily
Lin, Jessica G.
Smith, Perri
Murray, Genevra F.
Hong, Haeyeon
Jacquet, Gabrielle A.
Koul, Rashmi
Rosenmoss, Sophie
James, Thea
Shankar, Kalpana Narayan
de la Vega, Pablo Buitron
author_facet Loo, Stephanie
Anderson, Emily
Lin, Jessica G.
Smith, Perri
Murray, Genevra F.
Hong, Haeyeon
Jacquet, Gabrielle A.
Koul, Rashmi
Rosenmoss, Sophie
James, Thea
Shankar, Kalpana Narayan
de la Vega, Pablo Buitron
author_sort Loo, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is an opportune venue to screen for unmet social needs and connect patients with social services. This quality improvement study incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data to examine unmet social needs among ED patients and program implementation. METHODS: From September 2020 to December 2021, an urban safety‐net hospital adult ED implemented a social needs screening and referral program. Trained emergency staff screened eligible patients for 5 social needs (housing, food, transportation, utilities, employment), giving resource guides to patients who screened positive (THRIVE+). We collected screening data from the electronic health record, conducted semi‐structured interviews with THRIVE+ patients and clinical staff, and directly observed discharge interactions. RESULTS: Emergency staff screened 58.5% of eligible patients for social risk. Of the screened patients, 27.0% reported at least 1 unmet social need. Of those, 74.8% requested assistance. Screened patients reported housing insecurity (16.3%) as the most prevalent unmet social need followed by food insecurity (13.3%) and unemployment (8.7%). Among interviewed patients, 57.1% recalled being screened, but only 24.5% recalled receiving resource guides. Patients who received guides reported little success connecting with resources and supported universal guide dissemination. Staff expressed preference for warm handoff to social services. Of 13 observed discharge interactions, clinical staff only discussed guides with 2 patients, with no positive endorsement of the guides in any observed interactions. CONCLUSIONS: An ED social needs screening program can be moderately feasible and accepted. We identified housing as the most prevalent need. Significant gaps exist between screening and referral, with few patients receiving resources. Further training and workflow optimization are underway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98714092023-01-25 Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department Loo, Stephanie Anderson, Emily Lin, Jessica G. Smith, Perri Murray, Genevra F. Hong, Haeyeon Jacquet, Gabrielle A. Koul, Rashmi Rosenmoss, Sophie James, Thea Shankar, Kalpana Narayan de la Vega, Pablo Buitron J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open General Medicine OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is an opportune venue to screen for unmet social needs and connect patients with social services. This quality improvement study incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data to examine unmet social needs among ED patients and program implementation. METHODS: From September 2020 to December 2021, an urban safety‐net hospital adult ED implemented a social needs screening and referral program. Trained emergency staff screened eligible patients for 5 social needs (housing, food, transportation, utilities, employment), giving resource guides to patients who screened positive (THRIVE+). We collected screening data from the electronic health record, conducted semi‐structured interviews with THRIVE+ patients and clinical staff, and directly observed discharge interactions. RESULTS: Emergency staff screened 58.5% of eligible patients for social risk. Of the screened patients, 27.0% reported at least 1 unmet social need. Of those, 74.8% requested assistance. Screened patients reported housing insecurity (16.3%) as the most prevalent unmet social need followed by food insecurity (13.3%) and unemployment (8.7%). Among interviewed patients, 57.1% recalled being screened, but only 24.5% recalled receiving resource guides. Patients who received guides reported little success connecting with resources and supported universal guide dissemination. Staff expressed preference for warm handoff to social services. Of 13 observed discharge interactions, clinical staff only discussed guides with 2 patients, with no positive endorsement of the guides in any observed interactions. CONCLUSIONS: An ED social needs screening program can be moderately feasible and accepted. We identified housing as the most prevalent need. Significant gaps exist between screening and referral, with few patients receiving resources. Further training and workflow optimization are underway. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9871409/ /pubmed/36704207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12883 Text en © 2022 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle General Medicine
Loo, Stephanie
Anderson, Emily
Lin, Jessica G.
Smith, Perri
Murray, Genevra F.
Hong, Haeyeon
Jacquet, Gabrielle A.
Koul, Rashmi
Rosenmoss, Sophie
James, Thea
Shankar, Kalpana Narayan
de la Vega, Pablo Buitron
Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title_full Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title_fullStr Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title_short Evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
title_sort evaluating a social risk screening and referral program in an urban safety‐net hospital emergency department
topic General Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12883
work_keys_str_mv AT loostephanie evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT andersonemily evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT linjessicag evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT smithperri evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT murraygenevraf evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT honghaeyeon evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT jacquetgabriellea evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT koulrashmi evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT rosenmosssophie evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT jamesthea evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT shankarkalpananarayan evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment
AT delavegapablobuitron evaluatingasocialriskscreeningandreferralprograminanurbansafetynethospitalemergencydepartment