Cargando…

Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Ting, Yan, Zhenpeng, Liu, Lili, Zhang, Xiaoyu, Chen, Guohui, Xu, Feng, Li, Ying, Zhang, Lijuan, Peng, Meilan, Wang, Lu, Li, Dandan, Zhao, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511
_version_ 1784877183058051072
author Yan, Ting
Yan, Zhenpeng
Liu, Lili
Zhang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Guohui
Xu, Feng
Li, Ying
Zhang, Lijuan
Peng, Meilan
Wang, Lu
Li, Dandan
Zhao, Dong
author_facet Yan, Ting
Yan, Zhenpeng
Liu, Lili
Zhang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Guohui
Xu, Feng
Li, Ying
Zhang, Lijuan
Peng, Meilan
Wang, Lu
Li, Dandan
Zhao, Dong
author_sort Yan, Ting
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with the loss function of the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to extract features for survival prediction. In addition, the Kaplan–Meier curve, the Schoenfeld residual analysis, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, the nomogram, and the calibration curve were performed to assess the survival prediction ability. RESULTS: The concordance index (C-index) of the survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, reached 0.78 in the training set, 0.75 in the validation set, and 0.74 in the test set. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median prognostic index (PI). Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis (p = < 2e-16 in the training set, p = 3e-04 in the validation set, and p = 0.007 in the test set), which showed that the survival probability of different groups was significantly different, and the PI of the network played an influential role in the prediction of survival probability. In the residual verification of the PI, the fitting curve of the scatter plot was roughly parallel to the x-axis, and the p-value of the test was 0.11, proving that the PI and survival time were independent of each other and the survival prediction ability of the PI was less affected than survival time. The areas under the curve of the training set were 0.843, 0.871, 0.903, and 0.941; those of the validation set were 0.687, 0.895, 1.000, and 0.967; and those of the test set were 0.757, 0.852, 0.683, and 0.898. CONCLUSION: The survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with GBM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98714812023-01-25 Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network Yan, Ting Yan, Zhenpeng Liu, Lili Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Guohui Xu, Feng Li, Ying Zhang, Lijuan Peng, Meilan Wang, Lu Li, Dandan Zhao, Dong Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with the loss function of the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to extract features for survival prediction. In addition, the Kaplan–Meier curve, the Schoenfeld residual analysis, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, the nomogram, and the calibration curve were performed to assess the survival prediction ability. RESULTS: The concordance index (C-index) of the survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, reached 0.78 in the training set, 0.75 in the validation set, and 0.74 in the test set. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median prognostic index (PI). Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis (p = < 2e-16 in the training set, p = 3e-04 in the validation set, and p = 0.007 in the test set), which showed that the survival probability of different groups was significantly different, and the PI of the network played an influential role in the prediction of survival probability. In the residual verification of the PI, the fitting curve of the scatter plot was roughly parallel to the x-axis, and the p-value of the test was 0.11, proving that the PI and survival time were independent of each other and the survival prediction ability of the PI was less affected than survival time. The areas under the curve of the training set were 0.843, 0.871, 0.903, and 0.941; those of the validation set were 0.687, 0.895, 1.000, and 0.967; and those of the test set were 0.757, 0.852, 0.683, and 0.898. CONCLUSION: The survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with GBM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9871481/ /pubmed/36704230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yan, Yan, Liu, Zhang, Chen, Xu, Li, Zhang, Peng, Wang, Li and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Yan, Ting
Yan, Zhenpeng
Liu, Lili
Zhang, Xiaoyu
Chen, Guohui
Xu, Feng
Li, Ying
Zhang, Lijuan
Peng, Meilan
Wang, Lu
Li, Dandan
Zhao, Dong
Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title_full Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title_fullStr Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title_full_unstemmed Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title_short Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
title_sort survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704230
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511
work_keys_str_mv AT yanting survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT yanzhenpeng survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT liulili survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT zhangxiaoyu survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT chenguohui survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT xufeng survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT liying survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT zhanglijuan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT pengmeilan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT wanglu survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT lidandan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork
AT zhaodong survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork