Cargando…
Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511 |
_version_ | 1784877183058051072 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Ting Yan, Zhenpeng Liu, Lili Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Guohui Xu, Feng Li, Ying Zhang, Lijuan Peng, Meilan Wang, Lu Li, Dandan Zhao, Dong |
author_facet | Yan, Ting Yan, Zhenpeng Liu, Lili Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Guohui Xu, Feng Li, Ying Zhang, Lijuan Peng, Meilan Wang, Lu Li, Dandan Zhao, Dong |
author_sort | Yan, Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with the loss function of the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to extract features for survival prediction. In addition, the Kaplan–Meier curve, the Schoenfeld residual analysis, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, the nomogram, and the calibration curve were performed to assess the survival prediction ability. RESULTS: The concordance index (C-index) of the survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, reached 0.78 in the training set, 0.75 in the validation set, and 0.74 in the test set. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median prognostic index (PI). Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis (p = < 2e-16 in the training set, p = 3e-04 in the validation set, and p = 0.007 in the test set), which showed that the survival probability of different groups was significantly different, and the PI of the network played an influential role in the prediction of survival probability. In the residual verification of the PI, the fitting curve of the scatter plot was roughly parallel to the x-axis, and the p-value of the test was 0.11, proving that the PI and survival time were independent of each other and the survival prediction ability of the PI was less affected than survival time. The areas under the curve of the training set were 0.843, 0.871, 0.903, and 0.941; those of the validation set were 0.687, 0.895, 1.000, and 0.967; and those of the test set were 0.757, 0.852, 0.683, and 0.898. CONCLUSION: The survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with GBM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9871481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98714812023-01-25 Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network Yan, Ting Yan, Zhenpeng Liu, Lili Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Guohui Xu, Feng Li, Ying Zhang, Lijuan Peng, Meilan Wang, Lu Li, Dandan Zhao, Dong Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate a prognostic model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical features to predict the survival time of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: In this study, a convolutional denoising autoencoder (DAE) network combined with the loss function of the Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to extract features for survival prediction. In addition, the Kaplan–Meier curve, the Schoenfeld residual analysis, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, the nomogram, and the calibration curve were performed to assess the survival prediction ability. RESULTS: The concordance index (C-index) of the survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, reached 0.78 in the training set, 0.75 in the validation set, and 0.74 in the test set. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median prognostic index (PI). Kaplan–Meier curve was used for survival analysis (p = < 2e-16 in the training set, p = 3e-04 in the validation set, and p = 0.007 in the test set), which showed that the survival probability of different groups was significantly different, and the PI of the network played an influential role in the prediction of survival probability. In the residual verification of the PI, the fitting curve of the scatter plot was roughly parallel to the x-axis, and the p-value of the test was 0.11, proving that the PI and survival time were independent of each other and the survival prediction ability of the PI was less affected than survival time. The areas under the curve of the training set were 0.843, 0.871, 0.903, and 0.941; those of the validation set were 0.687, 0.895, 1.000, and 0.967; and those of the test set were 0.757, 0.852, 0.683, and 0.898. CONCLUSION: The survival prediction model, which combines the DAE and the Cox proportional hazard regression model, can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with GBM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9871481/ /pubmed/36704230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yan, Yan, Liu, Zhang, Chen, Xu, Li, Zhang, Peng, Wang, Li and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Yan, Ting Yan, Zhenpeng Liu, Lili Zhang, Xiaoyu Chen, Guohui Xu, Feng Li, Ying Zhang, Lijuan Peng, Meilan Wang, Lu Li, Dandan Zhao, Dong Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title | Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title_full | Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title_fullStr | Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title_short | Survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a Cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
title_sort | survival prediction for patients with glioblastoma multiforme using a cox proportional hazards denoising autoencoder network |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704230 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.916511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanting survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT yanzhenpeng survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT liulili survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT zhangxiaoyu survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT chenguohui survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT xufeng survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT liying survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT zhanglijuan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT pengmeilan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT wanglu survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT lidandan survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork AT zhaodong survivalpredictionforpatientswithglioblastomamultiformeusingacoxproportionalhazardsdenoisingautoencodernetwork |