Cargando…

Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional CO(2) laser and 1,550 nm Er: glass laser in the treatment for the patients with striae albae. METHODS: The female adults with striae albae in the abdomen for at least 12 months were recruited. After informed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Yanfei, Lin, Yan, Wang, Meiling, Gao, Xiaoyuan, Liu, Xiaodong, Liu, Huaxu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1060815
_version_ 1784877223093731328
author Luo, Yanfei
Lin, Yan
Wang, Meiling
Gao, Xiaoyuan
Liu, Xiaodong
Liu, Huaxu
author_facet Luo, Yanfei
Lin, Yan
Wang, Meiling
Gao, Xiaoyuan
Liu, Xiaodong
Liu, Huaxu
author_sort Luo, Yanfei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional CO(2) laser and 1,550 nm Er: glass laser in the treatment for the patients with striae albae. METHODS: The female adults with striae albae in the abdomen for at least 12 months were recruited. After informed consent obtained, the patient received three treatments at 2-month intervals. The lesions on the left abdomen were treated with 10,600 nm CO(2) fractional laser and right side treated with 1,550 nm Er: glass fractional laser. The pictures were taken before each visit and 3 months after the final treatment. The criteria for the evaluations using a quartile grading scale were excellent (76–100%), good (51–75%), fair (26–50%), poor (1-25%), and no improvement (0%). The safety and efficacy of the two lasers were independently evaluated using before and after photographs by two dermatologists. In addition, the self-reports to investigate the pain and satisfaction from patients were also recorded. RESULTS: Totally, 27 cases were recruited, and 25 patients completed the treatments and follow-up. The excellent and good results (improvement of 51–100%) were achieved on the right abdomen in 84% of the patients, while 48% on the left site (p < 0.05). Hyper-pigmentation was seen in 20% of the patients assessed on the left abdomen and only in 8% on the right abdomen. During the treatments, average score of the pain on the right abdomen was 5.41 ± 2.13, which was higher than that on the left (4.19 ± 2.12) (p < 0.001). No permanent hyper-pigmentation was found on the both sides. Considering the whole treatments, the patients favored the modality used on the right side (80 vs. 68%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with CO(2) fractional laser, 1,550 nm Er: glass fractional laser therapy provides the significantly better clinical outcomes and fewer side effects in the treatment of striae albae. LIMITATIONS: The sample size and follow-up time were limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98716432023-01-25 Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study Luo, Yanfei Lin, Yan Wang, Meiling Gao, Xiaoyuan Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Huaxu Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional CO(2) laser and 1,550 nm Er: glass laser in the treatment for the patients with striae albae. METHODS: The female adults with striae albae in the abdomen for at least 12 months were recruited. After informed consent obtained, the patient received three treatments at 2-month intervals. The lesions on the left abdomen were treated with 10,600 nm CO(2) fractional laser and right side treated with 1,550 nm Er: glass fractional laser. The pictures were taken before each visit and 3 months after the final treatment. The criteria for the evaluations using a quartile grading scale were excellent (76–100%), good (51–75%), fair (26–50%), poor (1-25%), and no improvement (0%). The safety and efficacy of the two lasers were independently evaluated using before and after photographs by two dermatologists. In addition, the self-reports to investigate the pain and satisfaction from patients were also recorded. RESULTS: Totally, 27 cases were recruited, and 25 patients completed the treatments and follow-up. The excellent and good results (improvement of 51–100%) were achieved on the right abdomen in 84% of the patients, while 48% on the left site (p < 0.05). Hyper-pigmentation was seen in 20% of the patients assessed on the left abdomen and only in 8% on the right abdomen. During the treatments, average score of the pain on the right abdomen was 5.41 ± 2.13, which was higher than that on the left (4.19 ± 2.12) (p < 0.001). No permanent hyper-pigmentation was found on the both sides. Considering the whole treatments, the patients favored the modality used on the right side (80 vs. 68%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with CO(2) fractional laser, 1,550 nm Er: glass fractional laser therapy provides the significantly better clinical outcomes and fewer side effects in the treatment of striae albae. LIMITATIONS: The sample size and follow-up time were limited. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9871643/ /pubmed/36703883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1060815 Text en Copyright © 2023 Luo, Lin, Wang, Gao, Liu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Luo, Yanfei
Lin, Yan
Wang, Meiling
Gao, Xiaoyuan
Liu, Xiaodong
Liu, Huaxu
Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title_full Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title_fullStr Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title_short Treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm Er: Glass vs. CO(2) fractional laser: A self-controlled study
title_sort treatment of striae albae with 1,550 nm er: glass vs. co(2) fractional laser: a self-controlled study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1060815
work_keys_str_mv AT luoyanfei treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy
AT linyan treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy
AT wangmeiling treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy
AT gaoxiaoyuan treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy
AT liuxiaodong treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy
AT liuhuaxu treatmentofstriaealbaewith1550nmerglassvsco2fractionallaseraselfcontrolledstudy