Cargando…

Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring

AIMS: In the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Functional Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rates were lower in patients with ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valika, Ali, Sulemanjee, Nasir, Pedersen, Rachel, Heidenreich, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36436826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14253
_version_ 1784877224598437888
author Valika, Ali
Sulemanjee, Nasir
Pedersen, Rachel
Heidenreich, Debra
author_facet Valika, Ali
Sulemanjee, Nasir
Pedersen, Rachel
Heidenreich, Debra
author_sort Valika, Ali
collection PubMed
description AIMS: In the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Functional Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rates were lower in patients with ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring guidance. We investigated the effect of ambulatory haemodynamic monitoring on 90 day readmission rates after HFH. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed patients across the Advocate Aurora Health hospital network who had undergone PAP sensor implantation between 1 October 2015 and 31 October 2019. Patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) or transplant prior to implantation were excluded. Rates of total HFH and 30 and 90 day all‐cause readmission up to 12 months after implantation were collected, while censoring for an endpoint of heart transplantation, VAD, or death. Event rates were compared using Poisson regression. Of 459 patients included, there were 404 HFHs before and 179 after implantation. Compared with pre‐implantation, 30 day all‐cause readmission [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.55 (0.39–0.77), P = 0.0006] and 90 day all cause readmission rates were lower post‐implantation [IRR: 0.45 (0.35–0.58), P < 0.0001]. The effect of PAP sensor implantation on 90 day all‐cause readmission incidence rates was consistent across multiple subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Across a large hospital network, ambulatory haemodynamic monitoring was associated with lower HFH rates, as well as 30 and 90 day all‐cause readmission rates. This supports the utility of ambulatory PAP monitoring to improve HF management in the era of value‐based medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98716492023-01-25 Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring Valika, Ali Sulemanjee, Nasir Pedersen, Rachel Heidenreich, Debra ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: In the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Functional Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rates were lower in patients with ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring guidance. We investigated the effect of ambulatory haemodynamic monitoring on 90 day readmission rates after HFH. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed patients across the Advocate Aurora Health hospital network who had undergone PAP sensor implantation between 1 October 2015 and 31 October 2019. Patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD) or transplant prior to implantation were excluded. Rates of total HFH and 30 and 90 day all‐cause readmission up to 12 months after implantation were collected, while censoring for an endpoint of heart transplantation, VAD, or death. Event rates were compared using Poisson regression. Of 459 patients included, there were 404 HFHs before and 179 after implantation. Compared with pre‐implantation, 30 day all‐cause readmission [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.55 (0.39–0.77), P = 0.0006] and 90 day all cause readmission rates were lower post‐implantation [IRR: 0.45 (0.35–0.58), P < 0.0001]. The effect of PAP sensor implantation on 90 day all‐cause readmission incidence rates was consistent across multiple subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Across a large hospital network, ambulatory haemodynamic monitoring was associated with lower HFH rates, as well as 30 and 90 day all‐cause readmission rates. This supports the utility of ambulatory PAP monitoring to improve HF management in the era of value‐based medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9871649/ /pubmed/36436826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14253 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Valika, Ali
Sulemanjee, Nasir
Pedersen, Rachel
Heidenreich, Debra
Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title_full Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title_fullStr Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title_short Reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
title_sort reduction in 90 day readmission rates utilizing ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36436826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14253
work_keys_str_mv AT valikaali reductionin90dayreadmissionratesutilizingambulatorypulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT sulemanjeenasir reductionin90dayreadmissionratesutilizingambulatorypulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT pedersenrachel reductionin90dayreadmissionratesutilizingambulatorypulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT heidenreichdebra reductionin90dayreadmissionratesutilizingambulatorypulmonarypressuremonitoring