Cargando…
Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
IMPORTANCE: Use of proton therapy reirradiation (PT-ReRT) for head and neck cancer is increasing; however, reports are heterogenous and outcomes can be difficult to interpret. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and toxic effects following PT-ReRT in a uniform and consecutive cohort of patients with hea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36689229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50607 |
_version_ | 1784877260718735360 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Anna Woods, Robbie Mahfouz, Amgad Kitpanit, Sarin Cartano, Olivia Mohamed, Nader Youssef, Irini Marqueen, Kathryn Sine, Kevin Mah, Dennis Neal, Brian Zakeri, Kaveh Kang, Jung J. Riaz, Nadeem Yu, Yao McBride, Sean M. Chen, Linda D. Tsai, C. Jillian Gelblum, Daphna Y. Press, Robert H. Michel, Loren S. Sherman, Eric J. Pfister, David Dunn, Lara A. Ho, Alan L. Fetten, James Wong, Richard J. Boyle, Jay O. Singh, Bhuvanesh Cracchiolo, Jennifer R. Ganly, Ian Cohen, Marc A. Lee, Nancy Y. |
author_facet | Lee, Anna Woods, Robbie Mahfouz, Amgad Kitpanit, Sarin Cartano, Olivia Mohamed, Nader Youssef, Irini Marqueen, Kathryn Sine, Kevin Mah, Dennis Neal, Brian Zakeri, Kaveh Kang, Jung J. Riaz, Nadeem Yu, Yao McBride, Sean M. Chen, Linda D. Tsai, C. Jillian Gelblum, Daphna Y. Press, Robert H. Michel, Loren S. Sherman, Eric J. Pfister, David Dunn, Lara A. Ho, Alan L. Fetten, James Wong, Richard J. Boyle, Jay O. Singh, Bhuvanesh Cracchiolo, Jennifer R. Ganly, Ian Cohen, Marc A. Lee, Nancy Y. |
author_sort | Lee, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Use of proton therapy reirradiation (PT-ReRT) for head and neck cancer is increasing; however, reports are heterogenous and outcomes can be difficult to interpret. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and toxic effects following PT-ReRT in a uniform and consecutive cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with recurrent primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with PT-ReRT from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, at a single institution. Patient, clinical, and treatment characteristics were obtained, and multidisciplinary review was performed to record and grade early and late toxic effects. EXPOSURES: Proton therapy reirradiation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Follow-up was defined from the start of PT-ReRT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for outcomes of interest, including local control (LC), locoregional control, distant metastatic control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess associations of covariates with OS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients (median [range] age, 63 [21-96] years; 183 [75.6%] male) were included. Of these patients, 231 (95.9%) had a Karnofsky performance status score of 70 or higher, and 145 (59.9%) had at least a 10–pack-year smoking history. Median (range) follow-up was 12.0 (5.8-26.0) months for all patients and 24.5 (13.8-37.8) months for living patients. A total of 206 patients (85.1%) had recurrent disease vs second primary or residual disease. The median (range) interval between radiation courses was 22 (1-669) months. Median PT-ReRT dose was 70 cobalt gray equivalents (CGE) for the fractionated cohort and 44.4 CGE for the quad shot cohort. For the fractionated cohort, the 1-year LC was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-79.0%) and the 1-year OS was 66.6% (95% CI, 58.1%-73.8%). For the quad shot cohort, the 1-year LC was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.4%-73.6%) and the 1-year OS was 28.5% (95% CI, 19.4%-38.3%). Higher Karnofsky performance status scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P = .046) and receipt of salvage surgery prior to PT-ReRT (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; P = .005) were associated with improved OS, whereas receipt of quad shot (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.36-2.86; P < .001) was associated with worse OS. There were a total of 73 grade 3 and 6 grade 4 early toxic effects. There were 79 potential grade 3, 4 grade 4, and 5 grade 5 late toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that, compared with previous reports with photon-based reirradiation, patients are living longer with aggressive PT-ReRT; however, surviving patients remain at risk of early and late complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9871797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98717972023-02-08 Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Lee, Anna Woods, Robbie Mahfouz, Amgad Kitpanit, Sarin Cartano, Olivia Mohamed, Nader Youssef, Irini Marqueen, Kathryn Sine, Kevin Mah, Dennis Neal, Brian Zakeri, Kaveh Kang, Jung J. Riaz, Nadeem Yu, Yao McBride, Sean M. Chen, Linda D. Tsai, C. Jillian Gelblum, Daphna Y. Press, Robert H. Michel, Loren S. Sherman, Eric J. Pfister, David Dunn, Lara A. Ho, Alan L. Fetten, James Wong, Richard J. Boyle, Jay O. Singh, Bhuvanesh Cracchiolo, Jennifer R. Ganly, Ian Cohen, Marc A. Lee, Nancy Y. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Use of proton therapy reirradiation (PT-ReRT) for head and neck cancer is increasing; however, reports are heterogenous and outcomes can be difficult to interpret. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and toxic effects following PT-ReRT in a uniform and consecutive cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with recurrent primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with PT-ReRT from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020, at a single institution. Patient, clinical, and treatment characteristics were obtained, and multidisciplinary review was performed to record and grade early and late toxic effects. EXPOSURES: Proton therapy reirradiation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Follow-up was defined from the start of PT-ReRT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for outcomes of interest, including local control (LC), locoregional control, distant metastatic control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to assess associations of covariates with OS. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients (median [range] age, 63 [21-96] years; 183 [75.6%] male) were included. Of these patients, 231 (95.9%) had a Karnofsky performance status score of 70 or higher, and 145 (59.9%) had at least a 10–pack-year smoking history. Median (range) follow-up was 12.0 (5.8-26.0) months for all patients and 24.5 (13.8-37.8) months for living patients. A total of 206 patients (85.1%) had recurrent disease vs second primary or residual disease. The median (range) interval between radiation courses was 22 (1-669) months. Median PT-ReRT dose was 70 cobalt gray equivalents (CGE) for the fractionated cohort and 44.4 CGE for the quad shot cohort. For the fractionated cohort, the 1-year LC was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.8%-79.0%) and the 1-year OS was 66.6% (95% CI, 58.1%-73.8%). For the quad shot cohort, the 1-year LC was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.4%-73.6%) and the 1-year OS was 28.5% (95% CI, 19.4%-38.3%). Higher Karnofsky performance status scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P = .046) and receipt of salvage surgery prior to PT-ReRT (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; P = .005) were associated with improved OS, whereas receipt of quad shot (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.36-2.86; P < .001) was associated with worse OS. There were a total of 73 grade 3 and 6 grade 4 early toxic effects. There were 79 potential grade 3, 4 grade 4, and 5 grade 5 late toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that, compared with previous reports with photon-based reirradiation, patients are living longer with aggressive PT-ReRT; however, surviving patients remain at risk of early and late complications. American Medical Association 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9871797/ /pubmed/36689229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50607 Text en Copyright 2023 Lee A et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Lee, Anna Woods, Robbie Mahfouz, Amgad Kitpanit, Sarin Cartano, Olivia Mohamed, Nader Youssef, Irini Marqueen, Kathryn Sine, Kevin Mah, Dennis Neal, Brian Zakeri, Kaveh Kang, Jung J. Riaz, Nadeem Yu, Yao McBride, Sean M. Chen, Linda D. Tsai, C. Jillian Gelblum, Daphna Y. Press, Robert H. Michel, Loren S. Sherman, Eric J. Pfister, David Dunn, Lara A. Ho, Alan L. Fetten, James Wong, Richard J. Boyle, Jay O. Singh, Bhuvanesh Cracchiolo, Jennifer R. Ganly, Ian Cohen, Marc A. Lee, Nancy Y. Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title | Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full | Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_short | Evaluation of Proton Therapy Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
title_sort | evaluation of proton therapy reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36689229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeanna evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT woodsrobbie evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT mahfouzamgad evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT kitpanitsarin evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT cartanoolivia evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT mohamednader evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT youssefirini evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT marqueenkathryn evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT sinekevin evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT mahdennis evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT nealbrian evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT zakerikaveh evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT kangjungj evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT riaznadeem evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT yuyao evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT mcbrideseanm evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT chenlindad evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT tsaicjillian evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT gelblumdaphnay evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT pressroberth evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT michellorens evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT shermanericj evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT pfisterdavid evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT dunnlaraa evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT hoalanl evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT fettenjames evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT wongrichardj evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT boylejayo evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT singhbhuvanesh evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT cracchiolojenniferr evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT ganlyian evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT cohenmarca evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma AT leenancyy evaluationofprotontherapyreirradiationforpatientswithrecurrentheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinoma |