Cargando…

Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique that can be used in non-invasive brain-machine interface (BMI) systems to register brain electrical activity. The EEG signals are non-linear and non-stationary, making the decoding procedure a complex task. Deep learning techniques have been successfully a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Iago Henrique, Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1003984
_version_ 1784877282302623744
author de Oliveira, Iago Henrique
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
author_facet de Oliveira, Iago Henrique
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
author_sort de Oliveira, Iago Henrique
collection PubMed
description Electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique that can be used in non-invasive brain-machine interface (BMI) systems to register brain electrical activity. The EEG signals are non-linear and non-stationary, making the decoding procedure a complex task. Deep learning techniques have been successfully applied in several research fields, often improving the results compared with traditional approaches. Therefore, it is believed that these techniques can also improve the process of decoding brain signals in BMI systems. In this work, we present the implementation of two deep learning-based decoders and we compared the results with other state of art deep learning methods. The first decoder uses long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network and the second, entitled EEGNet-LSTM, combines a well-known neural decoder based on convolutional neural networks, called EEGNet, with some LSTM layers. The decoders have been tested using data set 2a from BCI Competition IV, and the results showed that the EEGNet-LSTM decoder has been approximately 23% better than the competition-winning decoder. A Wilcoxon t-test showed a significant difference between the two decoders (Z = 2.524, p = 0.012). The LSTM-based decoder has been approximately 9% higher than the best decoder from the same competition. However, there was no significant difference (Z = 1.540, p = 0.123). In order to verify the replication of the EEGNet-LSTM decoder on another data, we performed a test with PhysioNet's Physiobank EEG Motor Movement/Imagery dataset. The EEGNet-LSTM presented a higher performance (0.85 accuracy) than the EEGNet (0.82 accuracy). The results of this work can be important for the development of new research, as well as EEG-based BMI systems, which can benefit from the high precision of neural decoders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9871886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98718862023-01-25 Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding de Oliveira, Iago Henrique Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Front Neurosci Neuroscience Electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique that can be used in non-invasive brain-machine interface (BMI) systems to register brain electrical activity. The EEG signals are non-linear and non-stationary, making the decoding procedure a complex task. Deep learning techniques have been successfully applied in several research fields, often improving the results compared with traditional approaches. Therefore, it is believed that these techniques can also improve the process of decoding brain signals in BMI systems. In this work, we present the implementation of two deep learning-based decoders and we compared the results with other state of art deep learning methods. The first decoder uses long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network and the second, entitled EEGNet-LSTM, combines a well-known neural decoder based on convolutional neural networks, called EEGNet, with some LSTM layers. The decoders have been tested using data set 2a from BCI Competition IV, and the results showed that the EEGNet-LSTM decoder has been approximately 23% better than the competition-winning decoder. A Wilcoxon t-test showed a significant difference between the two decoders (Z = 2.524, p = 0.012). The LSTM-based decoder has been approximately 9% higher than the best decoder from the same competition. However, there was no significant difference (Z = 1.540, p = 0.123). In order to verify the replication of the EEGNet-LSTM decoder on another data, we performed a test with PhysioNet's Physiobank EEG Motor Movement/Imagery dataset. The EEGNet-LSTM presented a higher performance (0.85 accuracy) than the EEGNet (0.82 accuracy). The results of this work can be important for the development of new research, as well as EEG-based BMI systems, which can benefit from the high precision of neural decoders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9871886/ /pubmed/36704007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1003984 Text en Copyright © 2023 de Oliveira and Rodrigues. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
de Oliveira, Iago Henrique
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title_full Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title_fullStr Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title_full_unstemmed Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title_short Empirical comparison of deep learning methods for EEG decoding
title_sort empirical comparison of deep learning methods for eeg decoding
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9871886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1003984
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiraiagohenrique empiricalcomparisonofdeeplearningmethodsforeegdecoding
AT rodriguesabnercardoso empiricalcomparisonofdeeplearningmethodsforeegdecoding