Cargando…

Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil

Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Junyang, Yu, Baoshan, Wang, Xueli, Chen, Lihong, Akhtar, Kashif, Tang, Shide, Lu, Huaming, He, Jinhua, Wen, Ronghui, He, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359
_version_ 1784877312497418240
author Zhao, Junyang
Yu, Baoshan
Wang, Xueli
Chen, Lihong
Akhtar, Kashif
Tang, Shide
Lu, Huaming
He, Jinhua
Wen, Ronghui
He, Bing
author_facet Zhao, Junyang
Yu, Baoshan
Wang, Xueli
Chen, Lihong
Akhtar, Kashif
Tang, Shide
Lu, Huaming
He, Jinhua
Wen, Ronghui
He, Bing
author_sort Zhao, Junyang
collection PubMed
description Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS, JLK1377, MXZ2, and YLY900) to compare the differences in the effects of leaf spray on Cd accumulation among different varieties. According to the change in Cd content in brown rice after Si application, the six rice varieties were divided into two types: Si-inhibited varieties (JLY1377, MXZ2, LY900, and YXYLS) and Si-stimulated varieties (WY1179 and YHSM). For Si-inhibited varieties, the Cd content of rice was reduced by 13.5%–65.7% after Si application. At the same time, the Cd content of the root, stem, leaf, panicle, and glume decreased to different degrees, the Cd content of the cell wall component increased by 2.2%–37.6%, the extraction state of Cd with strong mobile activity (ethanol-extracted and deionized water-extracted) was changed to the extraction state of Cd with weak mobile activity (acetic acid-extracted and hydrochloric acid-extracted), and the upward transport coefficient of different parts was reduced. For Si-stimulated varieties, Si application increased the Cd content of rice by 15.7%–24.1%. At the same time, the cell soluble component Cd content significantly increased by 68.4%–252.4% and changed the weakly mobile extraction state Cd to the strong mobile extraction state, increasing the upward transport coefficient of different sites. In conclusion, different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Foliar Si spraying inhibits the upward migration of Cd of Si-inhibited varieties, thereby reducing the Cd content of rice, but it has the opposite effect on Si-stimulated varieties. This result reminds us that we need to consider the difference in the effect of varieties in the implementation of foliar Si spraying in remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98720212023-01-25 Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil Zhao, Junyang Yu, Baoshan Wang, Xueli Chen, Lihong Akhtar, Kashif Tang, Shide Lu, Huaming He, Jinhua Wen, Ronghui He, Bing Front Plant Sci Plant Science Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS, JLK1377, MXZ2, and YLY900) to compare the differences in the effects of leaf spray on Cd accumulation among different varieties. According to the change in Cd content in brown rice after Si application, the six rice varieties were divided into two types: Si-inhibited varieties (JLY1377, MXZ2, LY900, and YXYLS) and Si-stimulated varieties (WY1179 and YHSM). For Si-inhibited varieties, the Cd content of rice was reduced by 13.5%–65.7% after Si application. At the same time, the Cd content of the root, stem, leaf, panicle, and glume decreased to different degrees, the Cd content of the cell wall component increased by 2.2%–37.6%, the extraction state of Cd with strong mobile activity (ethanol-extracted and deionized water-extracted) was changed to the extraction state of Cd with weak mobile activity (acetic acid-extracted and hydrochloric acid-extracted), and the upward transport coefficient of different parts was reduced. For Si-stimulated varieties, Si application increased the Cd content of rice by 15.7%–24.1%. At the same time, the cell soluble component Cd content significantly increased by 68.4%–252.4% and changed the weakly mobile extraction state Cd to the strong mobile extraction state, increasing the upward transport coefficient of different sites. In conclusion, different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Foliar Si spraying inhibits the upward migration of Cd of Si-inhibited varieties, thereby reducing the Cd content of rice, but it has the opposite effect on Si-stimulated varieties. This result reminds us that we need to consider the difference in the effect of varieties in the implementation of foliar Si spraying in remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy fields. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9872021/ /pubmed/36704163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Yu, Wang, Chen, Akhtar, Tang, Lu, He, Wen and He https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Zhao, Junyang
Yu, Baoshan
Wang, Xueli
Chen, Lihong
Akhtar, Kashif
Tang, Shide
Lu, Huaming
He, Jinhua
Wen, Ronghui
He, Bing
Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title_full Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title_fullStr Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title_short Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
title_sort differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojunyang differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT yubaoshan differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT wangxueli differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT chenlihong differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT akhtarkashif differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT tangshide differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT luhuaming differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT hejinhua differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT wenronghui differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil
AT hebing differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil