Cargando…
Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil
Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359 |
_version_ | 1784877312497418240 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Junyang Yu, Baoshan Wang, Xueli Chen, Lihong Akhtar, Kashif Tang, Shide Lu, Huaming He, Jinhua Wen, Ronghui He, Bing |
author_facet | Zhao, Junyang Yu, Baoshan Wang, Xueli Chen, Lihong Akhtar, Kashif Tang, Shide Lu, Huaming He, Jinhua Wen, Ronghui He, Bing |
author_sort | Zhao, Junyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS, JLK1377, MXZ2, and YLY900) to compare the differences in the effects of leaf spray on Cd accumulation among different varieties. According to the change in Cd content in brown rice after Si application, the six rice varieties were divided into two types: Si-inhibited varieties (JLY1377, MXZ2, LY900, and YXYLS) and Si-stimulated varieties (WY1179 and YHSM). For Si-inhibited varieties, the Cd content of rice was reduced by 13.5%–65.7% after Si application. At the same time, the Cd content of the root, stem, leaf, panicle, and glume decreased to different degrees, the Cd content of the cell wall component increased by 2.2%–37.6%, the extraction state of Cd with strong mobile activity (ethanol-extracted and deionized water-extracted) was changed to the extraction state of Cd with weak mobile activity (acetic acid-extracted and hydrochloric acid-extracted), and the upward transport coefficient of different parts was reduced. For Si-stimulated varieties, Si application increased the Cd content of rice by 15.7%–24.1%. At the same time, the cell soluble component Cd content significantly increased by 68.4%–252.4% and changed the weakly mobile extraction state Cd to the strong mobile extraction state, increasing the upward transport coefficient of different sites. In conclusion, different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Foliar Si spraying inhibits the upward migration of Cd of Si-inhibited varieties, thereby reducing the Cd content of rice, but it has the opposite effect on Si-stimulated varieties. This result reminds us that we need to consider the difference in the effect of varieties in the implementation of foliar Si spraying in remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy fields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9872021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98720212023-01-25 Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil Zhao, Junyang Yu, Baoshan Wang, Xueli Chen, Lihong Akhtar, Kashif Tang, Shide Lu, Huaming He, Jinhua Wen, Ronghui He, Bing Front Plant Sci Plant Science Most studies have shown that foliar silicon (Si) spraying can reduce the risk of rice quality safety caused by cadmium (Cd) contamination. However, it has recently been found that different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Therefore, we selected six rice varieties (YHSM, YXY1179, YXYLS, JLK1377, MXZ2, and YLY900) to compare the differences in the effects of leaf spray on Cd accumulation among different varieties. According to the change in Cd content in brown rice after Si application, the six rice varieties were divided into two types: Si-inhibited varieties (JLY1377, MXZ2, LY900, and YXYLS) and Si-stimulated varieties (WY1179 and YHSM). For Si-inhibited varieties, the Cd content of rice was reduced by 13.5%–65.7% after Si application. At the same time, the Cd content of the root, stem, leaf, panicle, and glume decreased to different degrees, the Cd content of the cell wall component increased by 2.2%–37.6%, the extraction state of Cd with strong mobile activity (ethanol-extracted and deionized water-extracted) was changed to the extraction state of Cd with weak mobile activity (acetic acid-extracted and hydrochloric acid-extracted), and the upward transport coefficient of different parts was reduced. For Si-stimulated varieties, Si application increased the Cd content of rice by 15.7%–24.1%. At the same time, the cell soluble component Cd content significantly increased by 68.4%–252.4% and changed the weakly mobile extraction state Cd to the strong mobile extraction state, increasing the upward transport coefficient of different sites. In conclusion, different rice varieties have different responses to Si. Foliar Si spraying inhibits the upward migration of Cd of Si-inhibited varieties, thereby reducing the Cd content of rice, but it has the opposite effect on Si-stimulated varieties. This result reminds us that we need to consider the difference in the effect of varieties in the implementation of foliar Si spraying in remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy fields. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9872021/ /pubmed/36704163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Yu, Wang, Chen, Akhtar, Tang, Lu, He, Wen and He https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Zhao, Junyang Yu, Baoshan Wang, Xueli Chen, Lihong Akhtar, Kashif Tang, Shide Lu, Huaming He, Jinhua Wen, Ronghui He, Bing Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title | Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title_full | Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title_fullStr | Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title_short | Differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
title_sort | differences in the response mechanism of cadmium uptake, transfer, and accumulation of different rice varieties after foliar silicon spraying under cadmium-stressed soil |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1064359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaojunyang differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT yubaoshan differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT wangxueli differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT chenlihong differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT akhtarkashif differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT tangshide differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT luhuaming differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT hejinhua differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT wenronghui differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil AT hebing differencesintheresponsemechanismofcadmiumuptaketransferandaccumulationofdifferentricevarietiesafterfoliarsiliconsprayingundercadmiumstressedsoil |