Cargando…
End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study
BACKGROUND AND AIM: End-of-Life (EOL) decision-making in paediatric critical care can be complex and heterogeneous, reflecting national culture and law as well as the relative resources provided for healthcare. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the experiences and attitude...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067860 |
_version_ | 1784877313297481728 |
---|---|
author | Zanin, Anna Brierley, Joe Latour, Jos M. Gawronski, Orsola |
author_facet | Zanin, Anna Brierley, Joe Latour, Jos M. Gawronski, Orsola |
author_sort | Zanin, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: End-of-Life (EOL) decision-making in paediatric critical care can be complex and heterogeneous, reflecting national culture and law as well as the relative resources provided for healthcare. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the experiences and attitudes of European paediatric intensive care doctors, nurses and allied health professionals about end-of-life decision-making and care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study in which we distributed an electronic survey to the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) members by email and social media. The survey had three sections: (i) 16 items about attitudes to EOL care, (ii) 14 items about EOL decisions, and (iii) 18 items about EOL care in practice. We used a 5-point Likert scale and performed descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 198 questionnaires were completed by physicians (62%), nurses (34%) and allied health professionals (4%). Nurses reported less active involvement in decision-making processes than doctors (64% vs. 95%; p < 0.001). As viewed by the child and family, the child's expected future quality of life was recognised as one of the most critical considerations in EOL decision-making. Sub-analysis of Northern, Central and Southern European regions revealed differences in the optimal timing of EOL decisions. Most respondents (n = 179; 90%) supported discussing organ donation with parents during EOL planning. In the sub-region analysis, differences were observed in the provision of deep sedation and nutritional support during EOL care. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown similar attitudes and experiences of EOL care among paediatric critical care professionals within European regions, but differences persist between European regions. Nurses are less involved in EOL decision-making than physicians. Further research should identify the key cultural, religious, legal and resource differences underlying these discrepancies. We recommend multi-professional ethics education to improve EOL care in European Paediatric Intensive Care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9872024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98720242023-01-25 End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study Zanin, Anna Brierley, Joe Latour, Jos M. Gawronski, Orsola Front Pediatr Pediatrics BACKGROUND AND AIM: End-of-Life (EOL) decision-making in paediatric critical care can be complex and heterogeneous, reflecting national culture and law as well as the relative resources provided for healthcare. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the experiences and attitudes of European paediatric intensive care doctors, nurses and allied health professionals about end-of-life decision-making and care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study in which we distributed an electronic survey to the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) members by email and social media. The survey had three sections: (i) 16 items about attitudes to EOL care, (ii) 14 items about EOL decisions, and (iii) 18 items about EOL care in practice. We used a 5-point Likert scale and performed descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 198 questionnaires were completed by physicians (62%), nurses (34%) and allied health professionals (4%). Nurses reported less active involvement in decision-making processes than doctors (64% vs. 95%; p < 0.001). As viewed by the child and family, the child's expected future quality of life was recognised as one of the most critical considerations in EOL decision-making. Sub-analysis of Northern, Central and Southern European regions revealed differences in the optimal timing of EOL decisions. Most respondents (n = 179; 90%) supported discussing organ donation with parents during EOL planning. In the sub-region analysis, differences were observed in the provision of deep sedation and nutritional support during EOL care. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown similar attitudes and experiences of EOL care among paediatric critical care professionals within European regions, but differences persist between European regions. Nurses are less involved in EOL decision-making than physicians. Further research should identify the key cultural, religious, legal and resource differences underlying these discrepancies. We recommend multi-professional ethics education to improve EOL care in European Paediatric Intensive Care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9872024/ /pubmed/36704131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067860 Text en © 2023 Zanin, Brierley, Latour and Gawronski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Zanin, Anna Brierley, Joe Latour, Jos M. Gawronski, Orsola End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title | End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title_full | End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title_fullStr | End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title_full_unstemmed | End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title_short | End-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: A European survey study |
title_sort | end-of-life decisions and practices as viewed by health professionals in pediatric critical care: a european survey study |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1067860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaninanna endoflifedecisionsandpracticesasviewedbyhealthprofessionalsinpediatriccriticalcareaeuropeansurveystudy AT brierleyjoe endoflifedecisionsandpracticesasviewedbyhealthprofessionalsinpediatriccriticalcareaeuropeansurveystudy AT latourjosm endoflifedecisionsandpracticesasviewedbyhealthprofessionalsinpediatriccriticalcareaeuropeansurveystudy AT gawronskiorsola endoflifedecisionsandpracticesasviewedbyhealthprofessionalsinpediatriccriticalcareaeuropeansurveystudy |