Cargando…

Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study

RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Philip, Quasim, Tara, Shaw, Martin, MacTavish, Pamela, Devine, Helen, Daniel, Malcolm, Nicolson, Fiona, O’Brien, Peter, Weir, Ashley, Strachan, Laura, Senior, Lorraine, Lucie, Phil, Bollan, Lynn, Duffty, Jane, Hogg, Lucy, Ross, Colette, Sim, Malcolm, Sundaram, Radha, Iwashyna, Theodore J, McPeake, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428
_version_ 1784877365535440896
author Henderson, Philip
Quasim, Tara
Shaw, Martin
MacTavish, Pamela
Devine, Helen
Daniel, Malcolm
Nicolson, Fiona
O’Brien, Peter
Weir, Ashley
Strachan, Laura
Senior, Lorraine
Lucie, Phil
Bollan, Lynn
Duffty, Jane
Hogg, Lucy
Ross, Colette
Sim, Malcolm
Sundaram, Radha
Iwashyna, Theodore J
McPeake, Joanne
author_facet Henderson, Philip
Quasim, Tara
Shaw, Martin
MacTavish, Pamela
Devine, Helen
Daniel, Malcolm
Nicolson, Fiona
O’Brien, Peter
Weir, Ashley
Strachan, Laura
Senior, Lorraine
Lucie, Phil
Bollan, Lynn
Duffty, Jane
Hogg, Lucy
Ross, Colette
Sim, Malcolm
Sundaram, Radha
Iwashyna, Theodore J
McPeake, Joanne
author_sort Henderson, Philip
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation. METHODS: This study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain. RESULTS: 137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, p=0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31, p=0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13, p=0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98722532023-01-25 Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study Henderson, Philip Quasim, Tara Shaw, Martin MacTavish, Pamela Devine, Helen Daniel, Malcolm Nicolson, Fiona O’Brien, Peter Weir, Ashley Strachan, Laura Senior, Lorraine Lucie, Phil Bollan, Lynn Duffty, Jane Hogg, Lucy Ross, Colette Sim, Malcolm Sundaram, Radha Iwashyna, Theodore J McPeake, Joanne Thorax Critical Care RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation. METHODS: This study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain. RESULTS: 137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, p=0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31, p=0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13, p=0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9872253/ /pubmed/35314485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Critical Care
Henderson, Philip
Quasim, Tara
Shaw, Martin
MacTavish, Pamela
Devine, Helen
Daniel, Malcolm
Nicolson, Fiona
O’Brien, Peter
Weir, Ashley
Strachan, Laura
Senior, Lorraine
Lucie, Phil
Bollan, Lynn
Duffty, Jane
Hogg, Lucy
Ross, Colette
Sim, Malcolm
Sundaram, Radha
Iwashyna, Theodore J
McPeake, Joanne
Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title_full Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title_short Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
title_sort evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
topic Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersonphilip evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT quasimtara evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT shawmartin evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT mactavishpamela evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT devinehelen evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT danielmalcolm evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT nicolsonfiona evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT obrienpeter evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT weirashley evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT strachanlaura evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT seniorlorraine evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT luciephil evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT bollanlynn evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT dufftyjane evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT hogglucy evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT rosscolette evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT simmalcolm evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT sundaramradha evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT iwashynatheodorej evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy
AT mcpeakejoanne evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy