Cargando…
Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study
RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428 |
_version_ | 1784877365535440896 |
---|---|
author | Henderson, Philip Quasim, Tara Shaw, Martin MacTavish, Pamela Devine, Helen Daniel, Malcolm Nicolson, Fiona O’Brien, Peter Weir, Ashley Strachan, Laura Senior, Lorraine Lucie, Phil Bollan, Lynn Duffty, Jane Hogg, Lucy Ross, Colette Sim, Malcolm Sundaram, Radha Iwashyna, Theodore J McPeake, Joanne |
author_facet | Henderson, Philip Quasim, Tara Shaw, Martin MacTavish, Pamela Devine, Helen Daniel, Malcolm Nicolson, Fiona O’Brien, Peter Weir, Ashley Strachan, Laura Senior, Lorraine Lucie, Phil Bollan, Lynn Duffty, Jane Hogg, Lucy Ross, Colette Sim, Malcolm Sundaram, Radha Iwashyna, Theodore J McPeake, Joanne |
author_sort | Henderson, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation. METHODS: This study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain. RESULTS: 137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, p=0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31, p=0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13, p=0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9872253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98722532023-01-25 Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study Henderson, Philip Quasim, Tara Shaw, Martin MacTavish, Pamela Devine, Helen Daniel, Malcolm Nicolson, Fiona O’Brien, Peter Weir, Ashley Strachan, Laura Senior, Lorraine Lucie, Phil Bollan, Lynn Duffty, Jane Hogg, Lucy Ross, Colette Sim, Malcolm Sundaram, Radha Iwashyna, Theodore J McPeake, Joanne Thorax Critical Care RATIONALE: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation. METHODS: This study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain. RESULTS: 137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, p=0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31, p=0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13, p=0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9872253/ /pubmed/35314485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Critical Care Henderson, Philip Quasim, Tara Shaw, Martin MacTavish, Pamela Devine, Helen Daniel, Malcolm Nicolson, Fiona O’Brien, Peter Weir, Ashley Strachan, Laura Senior, Lorraine Lucie, Phil Bollan, Lynn Duffty, Jane Hogg, Lucy Ross, Colette Sim, Malcolm Sundaram, Radha Iwashyna, Theodore J McPeake, Joanne Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title | Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title_full | Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title_short | Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
title_sort | evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study |
topic | Critical Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35314485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendersonphilip evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT quasimtara evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT shawmartin evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT mactavishpamela evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT devinehelen evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT danielmalcolm evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT nicolsonfiona evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT obrienpeter evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT weirashley evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT strachanlaura evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT seniorlorraine evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT luciephil evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT bollanlynn evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT dufftyjane evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT hogglucy evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT rosscolette evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT simmalcolm evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT sundaramradha evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT iwashynatheodorej evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy AT mcpeakejoanne evaluationofahealthandsocialcareprogrammetoimproveoutcomesfollowingcriticalillnessamulticentrestudy |