Cargando…

A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Surgical distractions are associated with worse patient outcomes. Lung transplantation and cardiac surgery’s multi-disciplinary nature, and their inherent complexities render them more vulnerable to distractions. We aim to use a novel distractions capture tool to evaluate the severity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arkley, James, Ong, Lay Ping, Gunaratnam, Niranjan, Butt, Tanveer, Clark, Stephen Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02065-5
_version_ 1784877392913760256
author Arkley, James
Ong, Lay Ping
Gunaratnam, Niranjan
Butt, Tanveer
Clark, Stephen Charles
author_facet Arkley, James
Ong, Lay Ping
Gunaratnam, Niranjan
Butt, Tanveer
Clark, Stephen Charles
author_sort Arkley, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Surgical distractions are associated with worse patient outcomes. Lung transplantation and cardiac surgery’s multi-disciplinary nature, and their inherent complexities render them more vulnerable to distractions. We aim to use a novel distractions capture tool to evaluate the severity of distractions during cardiac surgery (CS) and lung transplantation (LTx) and assess its impact on post-operative complications. METHODS: A prospective ‘blinded’ study was undertaken by direct observation of distractions during CS and LTx. Events were identified using the Imperial College Error Capture tool (ICECAP). Number and severity of distractions were correlated with post-operative outcomes (ICU & hospital stay, bleeding and anastomotic complications). RESULTS: In LTx, we observed 2059 distractions within 287 h across 41 surgeries. In CS, we observed 1089 distractions within 192 h across 62 surgeries. Surgeons were consciously aware of 19.2% (LTx) and 21.3% (CS) of recorded events. Distractions consisted of procedure-independent pressures (61% LTx vs 56% CS), equipment problems (15% LTx vs 23%CS), communication (12% LTx vs 12% CS), technical problems or patient safety concerns (12% LTx vs 9% CS). In CS, 91% of procedure-independent pressures were non-operative distractions whilst LTx recorded 83%. Staff absences at a critical moment of surgery were recorded at 9% (LTx) and 7% (CS). The number and severity of distractions correlated with bleeding (CS p < 0.001, LTx p < 0.01), prolonged ICU stay (CS p = 0.002, LTx p = 0.002), hospital stay (CS p < 0.001) and anastomotic complications(LTx p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ICECAP as a novel surgical distractions capture tool was effective & applicable to both elective cardiac and urgent transplant surgeries. Surgeons were unaware of a large number of distractions & interruptions. Distractions were associated with longer ICU stay and higher rate of bleeding. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-02065-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98723882023-01-25 A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes Arkley, James Ong, Lay Ping Gunaratnam, Niranjan Butt, Tanveer Clark, Stephen Charles J Cardiothorac Surg Research OBJECTIVES: Surgical distractions are associated with worse patient outcomes. Lung transplantation and cardiac surgery’s multi-disciplinary nature, and their inherent complexities render them more vulnerable to distractions. We aim to use a novel distractions capture tool to evaluate the severity of distractions during cardiac surgery (CS) and lung transplantation (LTx) and assess its impact on post-operative complications. METHODS: A prospective ‘blinded’ study was undertaken by direct observation of distractions during CS and LTx. Events were identified using the Imperial College Error Capture tool (ICECAP). Number and severity of distractions were correlated with post-operative outcomes (ICU & hospital stay, bleeding and anastomotic complications). RESULTS: In LTx, we observed 2059 distractions within 287 h across 41 surgeries. In CS, we observed 1089 distractions within 192 h across 62 surgeries. Surgeons were consciously aware of 19.2% (LTx) and 21.3% (CS) of recorded events. Distractions consisted of procedure-independent pressures (61% LTx vs 56% CS), equipment problems (15% LTx vs 23%CS), communication (12% LTx vs 12% CS), technical problems or patient safety concerns (12% LTx vs 9% CS). In CS, 91% of procedure-independent pressures were non-operative distractions whilst LTx recorded 83%. Staff absences at a critical moment of surgery were recorded at 9% (LTx) and 7% (CS). The number and severity of distractions correlated with bleeding (CS p < 0.001, LTx p < 0.01), prolonged ICU stay (CS p = 0.002, LTx p = 0.002), hospital stay (CS p < 0.001) and anastomotic complications(LTx p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ICECAP as a novel surgical distractions capture tool was effective & applicable to both elective cardiac and urgent transplant surgeries. Surgeons were unaware of a large number of distractions & interruptions. Distractions were associated with longer ICU stay and higher rate of bleeding. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-02065-5. BioMed Central 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9872388/ /pubmed/36691050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02065-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Arkley, James
Ong, Lay Ping
Gunaratnam, Niranjan
Butt, Tanveer
Clark, Stephen Charles
A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title_full A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title_fullStr A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title_full_unstemmed A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title_short A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
title_sort distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36691050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02065-5
work_keys_str_mv AT arkleyjames adistractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT onglayping adistractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT gunaratnamniranjan adistractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT butttanveer adistractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT clarkstephencharles adistractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT arkleyjames distractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT onglayping distractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT gunaratnamniranjan distractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT butttanveer distractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes
AT clarkstephencharles distractionscapturetoolforcardiacsurgeryandlungtransplantationimpactonoutcomes