Cargando…

Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown

Screen time shows higher health risks compared to other types of sedentary behaviors. A lockdown may simultaneously increase screen time, reduce physical activity (PA), and change time perception. Our goal was to compare self-reported against objectively measured smartphone screen time (SST) in a sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Júdice, Pedro B., Sousa-Sá, Eduarda, Palmeira, António L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00724-4
_version_ 1784877462674472960
author Júdice, Pedro B.
Sousa-Sá, Eduarda
Palmeira, António L.
author_facet Júdice, Pedro B.
Sousa-Sá, Eduarda
Palmeira, António L.
author_sort Júdice, Pedro B.
collection PubMed
description Screen time shows higher health risks compared to other types of sedentary behaviors. A lockdown may simultaneously increase screen time, reduce physical activity (PA), and change time perception. Our goal was to compare self-reported against objectively measured smartphone screen time (SST) in a sample of active and inactive Portuguese adults before and during a social lockdown. This study was a cross-sectional analysis with 211 Portuguese adults (57.8% males), aged 25.2 ± 8.5 years, from two cohorts, one before the social lockdown and the other during the lockdown. SST was self-reported (SR-SST) and objectively measured using a smartphone (OM-SST). PA was self-reported. Linear regressions were performed to determine the association between SR-SST and OM-SST. A Bland and Altman analysis was used to assess agreement. Independent T-tests were performed for comparisons between cohorts and paired sample T-tests for comparisons within each cohort. The cohort assessed during the lockdown showed a higher SST than the cohort assessed before the lockdown (OM-SST; p < 0.001 and SR-SST; p = 0.009). Before the lockdown, there was no difference between SR-SST and OM-SST (p = 0.100). However, during the social lockdown, although the agreement between SR-SST and OM-SST was good (ICC = 0.72), participants systematically underestimated their SST by ~ 71 min/day (p < 0.001), and this underestimation was higher in inactive participants (~ 85 min/day) than in active individuals (~ 49 min/day). The general population needs to be aware of the benefits of limiting screen time, especially during periods of societal modifications, such as a generalized lockdown. There was a tendency to underestimate SST, meaning a lack of awareness of the actual time spent in this potentially deleterious behavior. This underestimation was more pronounced during the lockdown period and for the inactive participants, thus posing a greater health risk. The findings from this investigation entail relevant information for policy makers to delineate strategies for reducing population screen time from a preventive health perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98727302023-01-25 Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown Júdice, Pedro B. Sousa-Sá, Eduarda Palmeira, António L. J Prev (2022) Original Paper Screen time shows higher health risks compared to other types of sedentary behaviors. A lockdown may simultaneously increase screen time, reduce physical activity (PA), and change time perception. Our goal was to compare self-reported against objectively measured smartphone screen time (SST) in a sample of active and inactive Portuguese adults before and during a social lockdown. This study was a cross-sectional analysis with 211 Portuguese adults (57.8% males), aged 25.2 ± 8.5 years, from two cohorts, one before the social lockdown and the other during the lockdown. SST was self-reported (SR-SST) and objectively measured using a smartphone (OM-SST). PA was self-reported. Linear regressions were performed to determine the association between SR-SST and OM-SST. A Bland and Altman analysis was used to assess agreement. Independent T-tests were performed for comparisons between cohorts and paired sample T-tests for comparisons within each cohort. The cohort assessed during the lockdown showed a higher SST than the cohort assessed before the lockdown (OM-SST; p < 0.001 and SR-SST; p = 0.009). Before the lockdown, there was no difference between SR-SST and OM-SST (p = 0.100). However, during the social lockdown, although the agreement between SR-SST and OM-SST was good (ICC = 0.72), participants systematically underestimated their SST by ~ 71 min/day (p < 0.001), and this underestimation was higher in inactive participants (~ 85 min/day) than in active individuals (~ 49 min/day). The general population needs to be aware of the benefits of limiting screen time, especially during periods of societal modifications, such as a generalized lockdown. There was a tendency to underestimate SST, meaning a lack of awareness of the actual time spent in this potentially deleterious behavior. This underestimation was more pronounced during the lockdown period and for the inactive participants, thus posing a greater health risk. The findings from this investigation entail relevant information for policy makers to delineate strategies for reducing population screen time from a preventive health perspective. Springer US 2023-01-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9872730/ /pubmed/36692818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00724-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Júdice, Pedro B.
Sousa-Sá, Eduarda
Palmeira, António L.
Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title_full Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title_fullStr Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title_short Discrepancies Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Smartphone Screen Time: Before and During Lockdown
title_sort discrepancies between self-reported and objectively measured smartphone screen time: before and during lockdown
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00724-4
work_keys_str_mv AT judicepedrob discrepanciesbetweenselfreportedandobjectivelymeasuredsmartphonescreentimebeforeandduringlockdown
AT sousasaeduarda discrepanciesbetweenselfreportedandobjectivelymeasuredsmartphonescreentimebeforeandduringlockdown
AT palmeiraantoniol discrepanciesbetweenselfreportedandobjectivelymeasuredsmartphonescreentimebeforeandduringlockdown