Cargando…
Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050 |
_version_ | 1784877484332810240 |
---|---|
author | Ward, William H. Hui, Jane Davis, Catherine H. Li, Tianyu Goel, Neha Handorf, Elizabeth Ross, Eric A. Curley, Steven A. Karachristos, Andreas Esnaola, Nestor F. |
author_facet | Ward, William H. Hui, Jane Davis, Catherine H. Li, Tianyu Goel, Neha Handorf, Elizabeth Ross, Eric A. Curley, Steven A. Karachristos, Andreas Esnaola, Nestor F. |
author_sort | Ward, William H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: We analyzed 11,814 patients with disseminated colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases who underwent isolated colon, rectal, or liver resections (CRs, RRs, or LRs) or combined colon/liver or rectal/liver resections (CCLRs or CRLRs) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (2011–2015). We examined associations between resection type and outcomes using univariate/multivariate analyses and used propensity adjustment to account for nonrandom receipt of isolated versus combined resections. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred thirty-seven (20.6%); 2108 (17.8%); and 6243 (52.8%) patients underwent isolated CR, RR, or LR; 557 (4.7%) and 469 (4.0%) underwent CCLR or CRLR. Three thousand three hundred ninety-five patients (28.7%) had serious complications (SCs). One hundred forty patients (1.2%) died, of which 113 (80.7%) were failure to rescue (FTR). One thousand three hundred eighty-six (11.7%) patients experienced unplanned readmission. After propensity adjustment and controlling for procedural complexity, wound class, and operation year, CCLR/CRLR was independently associated with increased risk of SC, as well as readmission (compared with LR). CCLR was also independently associated with increased risk of FTR and death (compared with LR). CONCLUSIONS: Combined resection uniformly confers increased risk of SC and increased risk of mortality after CCLR; addition of colorectal to LR increases risk of readmission. Combined resections are less safe, and potentially more costly, than isolated resections. Effective strategies to prevent SC after combined resections are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9872861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98728612023-01-27 Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis Ward, William H. Hui, Jane Davis, Catherine H. Li, Tianyu Goel, Neha Handorf, Elizabeth Ross, Eric A. Curley, Steven A. Karachristos, Andreas Esnaola, Nestor F. Ann Surg Open Original Study OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: We analyzed 11,814 patients with disseminated colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases who underwent isolated colon, rectal, or liver resections (CRs, RRs, or LRs) or combined colon/liver or rectal/liver resections (CCLRs or CRLRs) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (2011–2015). We examined associations between resection type and outcomes using univariate/multivariate analyses and used propensity adjustment to account for nonrandom receipt of isolated versus combined resections. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred thirty-seven (20.6%); 2108 (17.8%); and 6243 (52.8%) patients underwent isolated CR, RR, or LR; 557 (4.7%) and 469 (4.0%) underwent CCLR or CRLR. Three thousand three hundred ninety-five patients (28.7%) had serious complications (SCs). One hundred forty patients (1.2%) died, of which 113 (80.7%) were failure to rescue (FTR). One thousand three hundred eighty-six (11.7%) patients experienced unplanned readmission. After propensity adjustment and controlling for procedural complexity, wound class, and operation year, CCLR/CRLR was independently associated with increased risk of SC, as well as readmission (compared with LR). CCLR was also independently associated with increased risk of FTR and death (compared with LR). CONCLUSIONS: Combined resection uniformly confers increased risk of SC and increased risk of mortality after CCLR; addition of colorectal to LR increases risk of readmission. Combined resections are less safe, and potentially more costly, than isolated resections. Effective strategies to prevent SC after combined resections are warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9872861/ /pubmed/36714392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a "work of the United States Government" for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government. |
spellingShingle | Original Study Ward, William H. Hui, Jane Davis, Catherine H. Li, Tianyu Goel, Neha Handorf, Elizabeth Ross, Eric A. Curley, Steven A. Karachristos, Andreas Esnaola, Nestor F. Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis |
title | Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections:
Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
|
title_full | Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections:
Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
|
title_fullStr | Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections:
Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
|
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections:
Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
|
title_short | Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections:
Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
|
title_sort | perioperative outcomes following combined versus isolated colorectal and liver resections:
insights from a contemporary, national, propensity score-based analysis |
topic | Original Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wardwilliamh perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT huijane perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT daviscatherineh perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT litianyu perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT goelneha perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT handorfelizabeth perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT rosserica perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT curleystevena perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT karachristosandreas perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis AT esnaolanestorf perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis |