Cargando…

Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, William H., Hui, Jane, Davis, Catherine H., Li, Tianyu, Goel, Neha, Handorf, Elizabeth, Ross, Eric A., Curley, Steven A., Karachristos, Andreas, Esnaola, Nestor F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050
_version_ 1784877484332810240
author Ward, William H.
Hui, Jane
Davis, Catherine H.
Li, Tianyu
Goel, Neha
Handorf, Elizabeth
Ross, Eric A.
Curley, Steven A.
Karachristos, Andreas
Esnaola, Nestor F.
author_facet Ward, William H.
Hui, Jane
Davis, Catherine H.
Li, Tianyu
Goel, Neha
Handorf, Elizabeth
Ross, Eric A.
Curley, Steven A.
Karachristos, Andreas
Esnaola, Nestor F.
author_sort Ward, William H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: We analyzed 11,814 patients with disseminated colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases who underwent isolated colon, rectal, or liver resections (CRs, RRs, or LRs) or combined colon/liver or rectal/liver resections (CCLRs or CRLRs) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (2011–2015). We examined associations between resection type and outcomes using univariate/multivariate analyses and used propensity adjustment to account for nonrandom receipt of isolated versus combined resections. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred thirty-seven (20.6%); 2108 (17.8%); and 6243 (52.8%) patients underwent isolated CR, RR, or LR; 557 (4.7%) and 469 (4.0%) underwent CCLR or CRLR. Three thousand three hundred ninety-five patients (28.7%) had serious complications (SCs). One hundred forty patients (1.2%) died, of which 113 (80.7%) were failure to rescue (FTR). One thousand three hundred eighty-six (11.7%) patients experienced unplanned readmission. After propensity adjustment and controlling for procedural complexity, wound class, and operation year, CCLR/CRLR was independently associated with increased risk of SC, as well as readmission (compared with LR). CCLR was also independently associated with increased risk of FTR and death (compared with LR). CONCLUSIONS: Combined resection uniformly confers increased risk of SC and increased risk of mortality after CCLR; addition of colorectal to LR increases risk of readmission. Combined resections are less safe, and potentially more costly, than isolated resections. Effective strategies to prevent SC after combined resections are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98728612023-01-27 Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis Ward, William H. Hui, Jane Davis, Catherine H. Li, Tianyu Goel, Neha Handorf, Elizabeth Ross, Eric A. Curley, Steven A. Karachristos, Andreas Esnaola, Nestor F. Ann Surg Open Original Study OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare outcomes following combined versus isolated resections for metastatic colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases using a large, contemporary national database. BACKGROUND: Controversy persists regarding optimal timing of resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: We analyzed 11,814 patients with disseminated colorectal cancer and/or liver metastases who underwent isolated colon, rectal, or liver resections (CRs, RRs, or LRs) or combined colon/liver or rectal/liver resections (CCLRs or CRLRs) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (2011–2015). We examined associations between resection type and outcomes using univariate/multivariate analyses and used propensity adjustment to account for nonrandom receipt of isolated versus combined resections. RESULTS: Two thousand four hundred thirty-seven (20.6%); 2108 (17.8%); and 6243 (52.8%) patients underwent isolated CR, RR, or LR; 557 (4.7%) and 469 (4.0%) underwent CCLR or CRLR. Three thousand three hundred ninety-five patients (28.7%) had serious complications (SCs). One hundred forty patients (1.2%) died, of which 113 (80.7%) were failure to rescue (FTR). One thousand three hundred eighty-six (11.7%) patients experienced unplanned readmission. After propensity adjustment and controlling for procedural complexity, wound class, and operation year, CCLR/CRLR was independently associated with increased risk of SC, as well as readmission (compared with LR). CCLR was also independently associated with increased risk of FTR and death (compared with LR). CONCLUSIONS: Combined resection uniformly confers increased risk of SC and increased risk of mortality after CCLR; addition of colorectal to LR increases risk of readmission. Combined resections are less safe, and potentially more costly, than isolated resections. Effective strategies to prevent SC after combined resections are warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9872861/ /pubmed/36714392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a "work of the United States Government" for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
spellingShingle Original Study
Ward, William H.
Hui, Jane
Davis, Catherine H.
Li, Tianyu
Goel, Neha
Handorf, Elizabeth
Ross, Eric A.
Curley, Steven A.
Karachristos, Andreas
Esnaola, Nestor F.
Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title_full Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title_fullStr Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title_short Perioperative Outcomes Following Combined Versus Isolated Colorectal and Liver Resections: Insights From a Contemporary, National, Propensity Score-Based Analysis
title_sort perioperative outcomes following combined versus isolated colorectal and liver resections: insights from a contemporary, national, propensity score-based analysis
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000050
work_keys_str_mv AT wardwilliamh perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT huijane perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT daviscatherineh perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT litianyu perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT goelneha perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT handorfelizabeth perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT rosserica perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT curleystevena perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT karachristosandreas perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis
AT esnaolanestorf perioperativeoutcomesfollowingcombinedversusisolatedcolorectalandliverresectionsinsightsfromacontemporarynationalpropensityscorebasedanalysis