Cargando…

Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics

As researchers, institution-wide regulatory and organisational cultures guide our work. Over the past two decades, University Research Ethics Committees have been formally established across social science disciplines. However, the functioning of these committees has not been without critique. It is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: King, Gabrielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1939122
_version_ 1784877495721394176
author King, Gabrielle
author_facet King, Gabrielle
author_sort King, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description As researchers, institution-wide regulatory and organisational cultures guide our work. Over the past two decades, University Research Ethics Committees have been formally established across social science disciplines. However, the functioning of these committees has not been without critique. It is often argued that established ethical procedures informed by the medical sciences do not fit well with the more iterative epistemologies and unpredictable practices of doing social fieldwork. In this paper, I contribute to these discussions by considering what a further framework, a ‘culture of care’, might offer to university research ethics. A culture of care has evolved in contexts like the National Health Service (NHS) and animal research, and makes central claims around support, openness, collaboration and relationships. Bringing this to research ethics, I explore experiences of care through moments of friction in doing fieldwork with people living with Motor Neurone Disease. Identifying gaps between the institutional, personal and relational, I tentatively suggest some key features that a culture of care for research ethics might seek to develop. These discussions are also timely. Wider conversations emerging around reimagining research cultures in higher education provide an opportune moment to consider what a reimagined research ethics might look like and offer too.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9872949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98729492023-01-25 Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics King, Gabrielle Soc Cult Geogr Research Article As researchers, institution-wide regulatory and organisational cultures guide our work. Over the past two decades, University Research Ethics Committees have been formally established across social science disciplines. However, the functioning of these committees has not been without critique. It is often argued that established ethical procedures informed by the medical sciences do not fit well with the more iterative epistemologies and unpredictable practices of doing social fieldwork. In this paper, I contribute to these discussions by considering what a further framework, a ‘culture of care’, might offer to university research ethics. A culture of care has evolved in contexts like the National Health Service (NHS) and animal research, and makes central claims around support, openness, collaboration and relationships. Bringing this to research ethics, I explore experiences of care through moments of friction in doing fieldwork with people living with Motor Neurone Disease. Identifying gaps between the institutional, personal and relational, I tentatively suggest some key features that a culture of care for research ethics might seek to develop. These discussions are also timely. Wider conversations emerging around reimagining research cultures in higher education provide an opportune moment to consider what a reimagined research ethics might look like and offer too. Routledge 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9872949/ /pubmed/36712287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1939122 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
King, Gabrielle
Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title_full Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title_fullStr Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title_full_unstemmed Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title_short Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
title_sort towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36712287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1939122
work_keys_str_mv AT kinggabrielle towardsacultureofcareforethicalreviewconnectionsandfrictionsininstitutionalandindividualpracticesofsocialresearchethics