Cargando…

Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro

Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousseaud, Audrey, Prot, Matthieu, Loriere, Etienne Simon, Katz, Ira, Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando, Farjot, Géraldine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004
_version_ 1784877579837112320
author Rousseaud, Audrey
Prot, Matthieu
Loriere, Etienne Simon
Katz, Ira
Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando
Farjot, Géraldine
author_facet Rousseaud, Audrey
Prot, Matthieu
Loriere, Etienne Simon
Katz, Ira
Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando
Farjot, Géraldine
author_sort Rousseaud, Audrey
collection PubMed
description Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hypothesis that NO gas might have an impact on Sars-CoV-2 replication cycle and might be considered as a candidate therapy to treat COVID-19. To our knowledge, there are no in vitro preclinical studies demonstrating a virucidal effect of gaseous NO on SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to determine whether gaseous NO has an impact on the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. To that end, SARS-CoV-2 infected epithelial (VeroE6) and pulmonary (A549-hACE2) cells were treated with repeated doses of gaseous NO at different concentrations known to be efficient against bacteria. Our results show that exposing SARS-CoV-2 infected-cells to NO gas even at high doses (160 ppm, 6 h) does not influence the replication cycle of the virus in vitro. We report here that NO gas has no antiviral properties in vitro on SARS-COV-2. Therefore, there is no rationale for its usage in clinical settings to treat COVID-19 patients for direct antiviral purposes, which does not exclude other potential physiological benefits of this gas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9873364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98733642023-01-25 Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Rousseaud, Audrey Prot, Matthieu Loriere, Etienne Simon Katz, Ira Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando Farjot, Géraldine Nitric Oxide Article Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hypothesis that NO gas might have an impact on Sars-CoV-2 replication cycle and might be considered as a candidate therapy to treat COVID-19. To our knowledge, there are no in vitro preclinical studies demonstrating a virucidal effect of gaseous NO on SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to determine whether gaseous NO has an impact on the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. To that end, SARS-CoV-2 infected epithelial (VeroE6) and pulmonary (A549-hACE2) cells were treated with repeated doses of gaseous NO at different concentrations known to be efficient against bacteria. Our results show that exposing SARS-CoV-2 infected-cells to NO gas even at high doses (160 ppm, 6 h) does not influence the replication cycle of the virus in vitro. We report here that NO gas has no antiviral properties in vitro on SARS-COV-2. Therefore, there is no rationale for its usage in clinical settings to treat COVID-19 patients for direct antiviral purposes, which does not exclude other potential physiological benefits of this gas. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-03-01 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9873364/ /pubmed/36706864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Rousseaud, Audrey
Prot, Matthieu
Loriere, Etienne Simon
Katz, Ira
Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando
Farjot, Géraldine
Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title_full Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title_fullStr Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title_short Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
title_sort gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of sars-cov-2 in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004
work_keys_str_mv AT rousseaudaudrey gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro
AT protmatthieu gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro
AT loriereetiennesimon gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro
AT katzira gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro
AT ramirezgiljuanfernando gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro
AT farjotgeraldine gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro