Cargando…
Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004 |
_version_ | 1784877579837112320 |
---|---|
author | Rousseaud, Audrey Prot, Matthieu Loriere, Etienne Simon Katz, Ira Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando Farjot, Géraldine |
author_facet | Rousseaud, Audrey Prot, Matthieu Loriere, Etienne Simon Katz, Ira Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando Farjot, Géraldine |
author_sort | Rousseaud, Audrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hypothesis that NO gas might have an impact on Sars-CoV-2 replication cycle and might be considered as a candidate therapy to treat COVID-19. To our knowledge, there are no in vitro preclinical studies demonstrating a virucidal effect of gaseous NO on SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to determine whether gaseous NO has an impact on the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. To that end, SARS-CoV-2 infected epithelial (VeroE6) and pulmonary (A549-hACE2) cells were treated with repeated doses of gaseous NO at different concentrations known to be efficient against bacteria. Our results show that exposing SARS-CoV-2 infected-cells to NO gas even at high doses (160 ppm, 6 h) does not influence the replication cycle of the virus in vitro. We report here that NO gas has no antiviral properties in vitro on SARS-COV-2. Therefore, there is no rationale for its usage in clinical settings to treat COVID-19 patients for direct antiviral purposes, which does not exclude other potential physiological benefits of this gas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9873364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98733642023-01-25 Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Rousseaud, Audrey Prot, Matthieu Loriere, Etienne Simon Katz, Ira Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando Farjot, Géraldine Nitric Oxide Article Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to have antimicrobial activity in vitro and in some in vivo models, while the virucidal activity of NO remains elusive. Some studies using NO donors have suggested that NO could be a potential candidate to treat SARS-CoV infection. The Covid-19 pandemic raised the hypothesis that NO gas might have an impact on Sars-CoV-2 replication cycle and might be considered as a candidate therapy to treat COVID-19. To our knowledge, there are no in vitro preclinical studies demonstrating a virucidal effect of gaseous NO on SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to determine whether gaseous NO has an impact on the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. To that end, SARS-CoV-2 infected epithelial (VeroE6) and pulmonary (A549-hACE2) cells were treated with repeated doses of gaseous NO at different concentrations known to be efficient against bacteria. Our results show that exposing SARS-CoV-2 infected-cells to NO gas even at high doses (160 ppm, 6 h) does not influence the replication cycle of the virus in vitro. We report here that NO gas has no antiviral properties in vitro on SARS-COV-2. Therefore, there is no rationale for its usage in clinical settings to treat COVID-19 patients for direct antiviral purposes, which does not exclude other potential physiological benefits of this gas. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-03-01 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9873364/ /pubmed/36706864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Rousseaud, Audrey Prot, Matthieu Loriere, Etienne Simon Katz, Ira Ramirez-Gil, Juan Fernando Farjot, Géraldine Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title | Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title_full | Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title_fullStr | Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title_short | Gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro |
title_sort | gaseous nitric oxide failed to inhibit the replication cycle of sars-cov-2 in vitro |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36706864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2023.01.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rousseaudaudrey gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro AT protmatthieu gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro AT loriereetiennesimon gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro AT katzira gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro AT ramirezgiljuanfernando gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro AT farjotgeraldine gaseousnitricoxidefailedtoinhibitthereplicationcycleofsarscov2invitro |