Cargando…

Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the obturation quality and push-out bond strength of single cone obturation (SCO) and cold lateral compaction (CLC) with AH-Plus and Sure Seal Root (SSR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro experimental study was conducted on 88 single-rootedsingle-canal teeth with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nouroloyouni, Ahmad, Samadi, Vahid, Salem Milani, Amin, Noorolouny, Sara, Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3427151
_version_ 1784877594155417600
author Nouroloyouni, Ahmad
Samadi, Vahid
Salem Milani, Amin
Noorolouny, Sara
Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
author_facet Nouroloyouni, Ahmad
Samadi, Vahid
Salem Milani, Amin
Noorolouny, Sara
Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
author_sort Nouroloyouni, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study compared the obturation quality and push-out bond strength of single cone obturation (SCO) and cold lateral compaction (CLC) with AH-Plus and Sure Seal Root (SSR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro experimental study was conducted on 88 single-rootedsingle-canal teeth with straight roots that were randomly divided into four groups (n = 22). All teeth were decoronated and underwent cleaning and shaping. Obturation was performed with AH-Plus and SCO technique in group 1 (SAH), AH-Plus and CLC technique in group 2 (LAH), SSR and SCO technique in group 3 (SS), and SSR and CLC technique in group 4 (LS). The roots were then sectioned into 3-mm thick slices and underwent digital photography at x25 magnification to assess the quality of obturation in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds by Image J software. The PBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was also determined under a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The PBS was significantly higher in the LSS group than LAH and SAH groups, and also in the SSS group than the SAH group in all sections. The PBS in the LSS group was significantly higher than SSS in the coronal and middle thirds. Voids were significantly lower in LAH than in the SAH group in all sections. In LSS, voids in the coronal third were significantly lower than in LAH. In the middle third, voids in SSS were significantly lower than in SAH. The groups had no significant difference in the mode of failure (P > 0.05). The mean percentage of gutta-percha in the use of AH-Plus sealer was significantly higher than SSR (P < 0.05). The mean percentage of gutta-percha in the coronal third was lower than that in the middle and apical thirds (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SSR showed higher PBS and less voids than AH-Plus. High PBS of the CLC/SSR group showed that CLC should still be preferred to SCO, and in the case of using SCO, SSR should be preferred to AH-Plus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9873427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98734272023-01-25 Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength Nouroloyouni, Ahmad Samadi, Vahid Salem Milani, Amin Noorolouny, Sara Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study compared the obturation quality and push-out bond strength of single cone obturation (SCO) and cold lateral compaction (CLC) with AH-Plus and Sure Seal Root (SSR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro experimental study was conducted on 88 single-rootedsingle-canal teeth with straight roots that were randomly divided into four groups (n = 22). All teeth were decoronated and underwent cleaning and shaping. Obturation was performed with AH-Plus and SCO technique in group 1 (SAH), AH-Plus and CLC technique in group 2 (LAH), SSR and SCO technique in group 3 (SS), and SSR and CLC technique in group 4 (LS). The roots were then sectioned into 3-mm thick slices and underwent digital photography at x25 magnification to assess the quality of obturation in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds by Image J software. The PBS was measured by a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was also determined under a stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The PBS was significantly higher in the LSS group than LAH and SAH groups, and also in the SSS group than the SAH group in all sections. The PBS in the LSS group was significantly higher than SSS in the coronal and middle thirds. Voids were significantly lower in LAH than in the SAH group in all sections. In LSS, voids in the coronal third were significantly lower than in LAH. In the middle third, voids in SSS were significantly lower than in SAH. The groups had no significant difference in the mode of failure (P > 0.05). The mean percentage of gutta-percha in the use of AH-Plus sealer was significantly higher than SSR (P < 0.05). The mean percentage of gutta-percha in the coronal third was lower than that in the middle and apical thirds (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SSR showed higher PBS and less voids than AH-Plus. High PBS of the CLC/SSR group showed that CLC should still be preferred to SCO, and in the case of using SCO, SSR should be preferred to AH-Plus. Hindawi 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9873427/ /pubmed/36704662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3427151 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ahmad Nouroloyouni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nouroloyouni, Ahmad
Samadi, Vahid
Salem Milani, Amin
Noorolouny, Sara
Valizadeh-Haghi, Haleh
Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title_full Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title_fullStr Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title_full_unstemmed Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title_short Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength
title_sort single cone obturation versus cold lateral compaction techniques with bioceramic and resin sealers: quality of obturation and push-out bond strength
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3427151
work_keys_str_mv AT nouroloyouniahmad singleconeobturationversuscoldlateralcompactiontechniqueswithbioceramicandresinsealersqualityofobturationandpushoutbondstrength
AT samadivahid singleconeobturationversuscoldlateralcompactiontechniqueswithbioceramicandresinsealersqualityofobturationandpushoutbondstrength
AT salemmilaniamin singleconeobturationversuscoldlateralcompactiontechniqueswithbioceramicandresinsealersqualityofobturationandpushoutbondstrength
AT noorolounysara singleconeobturationversuscoldlateralcompactiontechniqueswithbioceramicandresinsealersqualityofobturationandpushoutbondstrength
AT valizadehhaghihaleh singleconeobturationversuscoldlateralcompactiontechniqueswithbioceramicandresinsealersqualityofobturationandpushoutbondstrength