Cargando…

Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gostian, Magdalena, Loeser, Johannes, Bentley, Tanya, Wolber, Philipp, Schwarz, David, Balk, Matthias, Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002
_version_ 1784877792063651840
author Gostian, Magdalena
Loeser, Johannes
Bentley, Tanya
Wolber, Philipp
Schwarz, David
Balk, Matthias
Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
author_facet Gostian, Magdalena
Loeser, Johannes
Bentley, Tanya
Wolber, Philipp
Schwarz, David
Balk, Matthias
Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
author_sort Gostian, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) after TE. Average and maximum pain severities (Numeric Rating Scale – NRS: 0–10) on PODs 1–3, analgesic score, quality of life, patient satisfaction and side effects were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Average pain severities of the protocol and the PCIA group were of similar magnitude (NRS) (POD1: 4.48 vs. 4.71 [p = 0.68], POD2: 4.75 vs. 4.22 [p = 0.32] and POD3: 4.44 vs. 4.25 [p = 0.71]). Maximum pain intensities on POD1 (p = 0.92), POD2 (p = 0.51) and POD3 (p = 0.36) were also comparable between both groups. Patients with a PCIA consumed significantly more opioids (p = 0.001) without significant more side-effects. CONCLUSION: The PCIA did not provide a superior pain control compared to oral analgesics. In view of the considerable effort and the high opioid consumption, it cannot be recommended as a standardized application for pain control after TE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9874349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98743492023-01-26 Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? Gostian, Magdalena Loeser, Johannes Bentley, Tanya Wolber, Philipp Schwarz, David Balk, Matthias Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) after TE. Average and maximum pain severities (Numeric Rating Scale – NRS: 0–10) on PODs 1–3, analgesic score, quality of life, patient satisfaction and side effects were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Average pain severities of the protocol and the PCIA group were of similar magnitude (NRS) (POD1: 4.48 vs. 4.71 [p = 0.68], POD2: 4.75 vs. 4.22 [p = 0.32] and POD3: 4.44 vs. 4.25 [p = 0.71]). Maximum pain intensities on POD1 (p = 0.92), POD2 (p = 0.51) and POD3 (p = 0.36) were also comparable between both groups. Patients with a PCIA consumed significantly more opioids (p = 0.001) without significant more side-effects. CONCLUSION: The PCIA did not provide a superior pain control compared to oral analgesics. In view of the considerable effort and the high opioid consumption, it cannot be recommended as a standardized application for pain control after TE. Elsevier 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9874349/ /pubmed/34716112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gostian, Magdalena
Loeser, Johannes
Bentley, Tanya
Wolber, Philipp
Schwarz, David
Balk, Matthias
Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title_full Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title_fullStr Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title_short Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
title_sort analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT gostianmagdalena analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT loeserjohannes analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT bentleytanya analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT wolberphilipp analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT schwarzdavid analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT balkmatthias analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated
AT gostianantoniuoreste analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated