Cargando…
Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated?
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) af...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 |
_version_ | 1784877792063651840 |
---|---|
author | Gostian, Magdalena Loeser, Johannes Bentley, Tanya Wolber, Philipp Schwarz, David Balk, Matthias Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_facet | Gostian, Magdalena Loeser, Johannes Bentley, Tanya Wolber, Philipp Schwarz, David Balk, Matthias Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_sort | Gostian, Magdalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) after TE. Average and maximum pain severities (Numeric Rating Scale – NRS: 0–10) on PODs 1–3, analgesic score, quality of life, patient satisfaction and side effects were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Average pain severities of the protocol and the PCIA group were of similar magnitude (NRS) (POD1: 4.48 vs. 4.71 [p = 0.68], POD2: 4.75 vs. 4.22 [p = 0.32] and POD3: 4.44 vs. 4.25 [p = 0.71]). Maximum pain intensities on POD1 (p = 0.92), POD2 (p = 0.51) and POD3 (p = 0.36) were also comparable between both groups. Patients with a PCIA consumed significantly more opioids (p = 0.001) without significant more side-effects. CONCLUSION: The PCIA did not provide a superior pain control compared to oral analgesics. In view of the considerable effort and the high opioid consumption, it cannot be recommended as a standardized application for pain control after TE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9874349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98743492023-01-26 Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? Gostian, Magdalena Loeser, Johannes Bentley, Tanya Wolber, Philipp Schwarz, David Balk, Matthias Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a morphine Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) after Tonsillectomies (TE). METHODS: 30 adult patients were treated with oral analgesics (protocol group) and compared to 30 patients treated with a morphine PCIA for the first 3 Postoperative Days (PODs) after TE. Average and maximum pain severities (Numeric Rating Scale – NRS: 0–10) on PODs 1–3, analgesic score, quality of life, patient satisfaction and side effects were defined as outcome measures. RESULTS: Average pain severities of the protocol and the PCIA group were of similar magnitude (NRS) (POD1: 4.48 vs. 4.71 [p = 0.68], POD2: 4.75 vs. 4.22 [p = 0.32] and POD3: 4.44 vs. 4.25 [p = 0.71]). Maximum pain intensities on POD1 (p = 0.92), POD2 (p = 0.51) and POD3 (p = 0.36) were also comparable between both groups. Patients with a PCIA consumed significantly more opioids (p = 0.001) without significant more side-effects. CONCLUSION: The PCIA did not provide a superior pain control compared to oral analgesics. In view of the considerable effort and the high opioid consumption, it cannot be recommended as a standardized application for pain control after TE. Elsevier 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9874349/ /pubmed/34716112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gostian, Magdalena Loeser, Johannes Bentley, Tanya Wolber, Philipp Schwarz, David Balk, Matthias Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title | Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title_full | Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title_fullStr | Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title_full_unstemmed | Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title_short | Analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
title_sort | analgesia after tonsillectomy with controlled intravenous morphine — overdue or exaggerated? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34716112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.08.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gostianmagdalena analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT loeserjohannes analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT bentleytanya analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT wolberphilipp analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT schwarzdavid analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT balkmatthias analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated AT gostianantoniuoreste analgesiaaftertonsillectomywithcontrolledintravenousmorphineoverdueorexaggerated |