Cargando…

The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of corticosteroids following facial nerve neurorrhaphy in the setting of complete transection is questionable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate corticosteroid efficacy on facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery after complete disruption and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charoenlux, Prapitphan, Utoomprurkporn, Nattawan, Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.005
_version_ 1784877794565554176
author Charoenlux, Prapitphan
Utoomprurkporn, Nattawan
Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
author_facet Charoenlux, Prapitphan
Utoomprurkporn, Nattawan
Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
author_sort Charoenlux, Prapitphan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The benefit of corticosteroids following facial nerve neurorrhaphy in the setting of complete transection is questionable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate corticosteroid efficacy on facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery after complete disruption and neurorrhaphy. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials on both human and animal models from Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE studying corticosteroid efficacy in complete facial nerve disruption followed by neurorrhaphy were included. Data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. The outcomes were evaluated from electrophysiology, histology, and functional recovery. However, no randomized controlled trial in human was performed. Possibly, performing human trials with histopathology may not be feasible in clinical setting. RESULTS: Six animal studies (248 participants) met inclusion criteria. Electrophysiologic outcomes revealed no differences in latency (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = −1.97, 95% CI −7.38 to 3.44, p = 0.47) and amplitude (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI −0.44 to 1.18, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroids and controls. When analysis compared topical corticosteroid and control, the results provided no differences in latency (Mean Difference (MD) = 0.10, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.24, p = 0.16) and amplitude (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.08 to 0.10, p = 0.81). In histologic outcomes, the results showed no differences in axon diameter (MD = 0.13, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.41, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroid and control; however, the result in myelin thickness (MD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.08, p < 0.05) favored control group. When comparing systemic corticosteroid with control in eye blinking, the results favored control (MD = 1.33, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.06, p =  0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: This evidence did not show potential benefits of systemic or topical corticosteroid deliveries after facial nerve neurorrhaphy in complete transection when evaluating electrophysiologic, histologic, and functional recovery outcomes in animal models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9874359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98743592023-01-26 The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial Charoenlux, Prapitphan Utoomprurkporn, Nattawan Seresirikachorn, Kachorn Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Review Article OBJECTIVES: The benefit of corticosteroids following facial nerve neurorrhaphy in the setting of complete transection is questionable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate corticosteroid efficacy on facial nerve regeneration and functional recovery after complete disruption and neurorrhaphy. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials on both human and animal models from Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid EMBASE studying corticosteroid efficacy in complete facial nerve disruption followed by neurorrhaphy were included. Data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. The outcomes were evaluated from electrophysiology, histology, and functional recovery. However, no randomized controlled trial in human was performed. Possibly, performing human trials with histopathology may not be feasible in clinical setting. RESULTS: Six animal studies (248 participants) met inclusion criteria. Electrophysiologic outcomes revealed no differences in latency (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) = −1.97, 95% CI −7.38 to 3.44, p = 0.47) and amplitude (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI −0.44 to 1.18, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroids and controls. When analysis compared topical corticosteroid and control, the results provided no differences in latency (Mean Difference (MD) = 0.10, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.24, p = 0.16) and amplitude (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI −0.08 to 0.10, p = 0.81). In histologic outcomes, the results showed no differences in axon diameter (MD = 0.13, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.41, p = 0.37) between systemic corticosteroid and control; however, the result in myelin thickness (MD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.08, p < 0.05) favored control group. When comparing systemic corticosteroid with control in eye blinking, the results favored control (MD = 1.33, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.06, p =  0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: This evidence did not show potential benefits of systemic or topical corticosteroid deliveries after facial nerve neurorrhaphy in complete transection when evaluating electrophysiologic, histologic, and functional recovery outcomes in animal models. Elsevier 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9874359/ /pubmed/34815200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.005 Text en © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Charoenlux, Prapitphan
Utoomprurkporn, Nattawan
Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_short The efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of corticosteroid after facial nerve neurorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT charoenluxprapitphan theefficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT utoomprurkpornnattawan theefficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seresirikachornkachorn theefficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT charoenluxprapitphan efficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT utoomprurkpornnattawan efficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seresirikachornkachorn efficacyofcorticosteroidafterfacialnerveneurorrhaphyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrial