Cargando…
Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada
INTRODUCTION: Evaluating a learning health system (LHS) encourages continuous system improvement and collaboration within the healthcare system. Although LHS is a widely accepted concept, there is little knowledge about evaluating an LHS. To explore the outputs and outcomes of an LHS model, we evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10350 |
_version_ | 1784877799279951872 |
---|---|
author | Groot, Gary Witham, Stephanie Badea, Andreea Baer, Susan Dalidowicz, Michelle Reeder, Bruce Froh, John Carr, Tracey |
author_facet | Groot, Gary Witham, Stephanie Badea, Andreea Baer, Susan Dalidowicz, Michelle Reeder, Bruce Froh, John Carr, Tracey |
author_sort | Groot, Gary |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Evaluating a learning health system (LHS) encourages continuous system improvement and collaboration within the healthcare system. Although LHS is a widely accepted concept, there is little knowledge about evaluating an LHS. To explore the outputs and outcomes of an LHS model, we evaluated the COVID‐19 Evidence Support Team (CEST) in Saskatchewan, Canada, an initiative to rapidly review scientific evidence about COVID‐19 for decision‐making. By evaluating this program during its formation, we explored how and to what extent the CEST initiative was used by stakeholders. An additional study aim was to understand how CEST could be applied as a functional LHS and the value of similar knowledge‐to‐action cycles. METHODS: Using a formative evaluation design, we conducted qualitative interviews with key informants (KIs) who were involved with COVID‐19 response strategies in Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify key themes. A program logic model was created to represent the inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes of the CEST initiative. RESULTS: Interview data from 11 KIs were collated under three overarching categories: (1) outputs, (2) short‐term outcomes, and (3) long‐term outcomes from the CEST initiative. Overall, participants found the CEST initiative improved speed and access to reliable information, supported and influenced decision‐making and public health strategies, leveraged partnerships, increased confidence and reassurance, and challenged misinformation. Themes relating to the long‐term outcomes of the initiative included improving coordination, awareness, and using good judgment and planning to integrate CEST sustainably into the health system. CONCLUSION: This formative evaluation demonstrated that CEST was a valued program and a promising LHS model for Saskatchewan. The future direction involves addressing program recommendations to implement this model as a functional LHS in Saskatchewan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9874378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98743782023-01-25 Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada Groot, Gary Witham, Stephanie Badea, Andreea Baer, Susan Dalidowicz, Michelle Reeder, Bruce Froh, John Carr, Tracey Learn Health Syst Research Reports INTRODUCTION: Evaluating a learning health system (LHS) encourages continuous system improvement and collaboration within the healthcare system. Although LHS is a widely accepted concept, there is little knowledge about evaluating an LHS. To explore the outputs and outcomes of an LHS model, we evaluated the COVID‐19 Evidence Support Team (CEST) in Saskatchewan, Canada, an initiative to rapidly review scientific evidence about COVID‐19 for decision‐making. By evaluating this program during its formation, we explored how and to what extent the CEST initiative was used by stakeholders. An additional study aim was to understand how CEST could be applied as a functional LHS and the value of similar knowledge‐to‐action cycles. METHODS: Using a formative evaluation design, we conducted qualitative interviews with key informants (KIs) who were involved with COVID‐19 response strategies in Saskatchewan. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify key themes. A program logic model was created to represent the inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes of the CEST initiative. RESULTS: Interview data from 11 KIs were collated under three overarching categories: (1) outputs, (2) short‐term outcomes, and (3) long‐term outcomes from the CEST initiative. Overall, participants found the CEST initiative improved speed and access to reliable information, supported and influenced decision‐making and public health strategies, leveraged partnerships, increased confidence and reassurance, and challenged misinformation. Themes relating to the long‐term outcomes of the initiative included improving coordination, awareness, and using good judgment and planning to integrate CEST sustainably into the health system. CONCLUSION: This formative evaluation demonstrated that CEST was a valued program and a promising LHS model for Saskatchewan. The future direction involves addressing program recommendations to implement this model as a functional LHS in Saskatchewan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9874378/ /pubmed/36714056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10350 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Groot, Gary Witham, Stephanie Badea, Andreea Baer, Susan Dalidowicz, Michelle Reeder, Bruce Froh, John Carr, Tracey Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title | Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title_full | Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title_fullStr | Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title_short | Evaluating a learning health system initiative: Lessons learned during COVID‐19 in Saskatchewan, Canada |
title_sort | evaluating a learning health system initiative: lessons learned during covid‐19 in saskatchewan, canada |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grootgary evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT withamstephanie evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT badeaandreea evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT baersusan evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT dalidowiczmichelle evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT reederbruce evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT frohjohn evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada AT carrtracey evaluatingalearninghealthsysteminitiativelessonslearnedduringcovid19insaskatchewancanada |