Cargando…

Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia

Despite anecdotal evidence of a COVID‐19 induced decline in the intensity of interstate migration in Australia, population‐level evidence is limited. The recent release of the 2020 wave of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey provides a unique opportunity to robustly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perales, Francisco, Bernard, Aude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.2626
_version_ 1784877808286171136
author Perales, Francisco
Bernard, Aude
author_facet Perales, Francisco
Bernard, Aude
author_sort Perales, Francisco
collection PubMed
description Despite anecdotal evidence of a COVID‐19 induced decline in the intensity of interstate migration in Australia, population‐level evidence is limited. The recent release of the 2020 wave of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey provides a unique opportunity to robustly assess the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the level, direction, determinants, and reasons for migration in Australia. By applying a series of regression models to individual‐level longitudinal microdata, and measuring migration at a range of spatial scales, this paper shows that COVID‐19 has somewhat accelerated the long‐term decline in the intensity of internal migration—particularly for residential mobility, short‐distance migration, and migration due to employment and involuntary reasons. The socio‐demographic determinants of migration have remained broadly stable, despite a slight increase in the deterring effect of duration of residence and a reduction in the impact of education. Finally, we show that the increase in net migration gains in regional areas is underpinned by a decrease in outflows. Juxtaposing these results with aggregate‐level migration statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics from 2021, we conclude that the effect of COVID‐19 on internal migration to date has been minimal and is likely to be short‐lived. However, it may still be too soon to make a definitive judgement, as shifts in work patterns stemming from the pandemic may further transform the level, direction, and composition of internal migration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9874503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98745032023-01-25 Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia Perales, Francisco Bernard, Aude Popul Space Place Research Articles Despite anecdotal evidence of a COVID‐19 induced decline in the intensity of interstate migration in Australia, population‐level evidence is limited. The recent release of the 2020 wave of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey provides a unique opportunity to robustly assess the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the level, direction, determinants, and reasons for migration in Australia. By applying a series of regression models to individual‐level longitudinal microdata, and measuring migration at a range of spatial scales, this paper shows that COVID‐19 has somewhat accelerated the long‐term decline in the intensity of internal migration—particularly for residential mobility, short‐distance migration, and migration due to employment and involuntary reasons. The socio‐demographic determinants of migration have remained broadly stable, despite a slight increase in the deterring effect of duration of residence and a reduction in the impact of education. Finally, we show that the increase in net migration gains in regional areas is underpinned by a decrease in outflows. Juxtaposing these results with aggregate‐level migration statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics from 2021, we conclude that the effect of COVID‐19 on internal migration to date has been minimal and is likely to be short‐lived. However, it may still be too soon to make a definitive judgement, as shifts in work patterns stemming from the pandemic may further transform the level, direction, and composition of internal migration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9874503/ /pubmed/36714823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.2626 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Population, Space and Place published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Perales, Francisco
Bernard, Aude
Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title_full Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title_fullStr Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title_short Continuity or change? How the onset of COVID‐19 affected internal migration in Australia
title_sort continuity or change? how the onset of covid‐19 affected internal migration in australia
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psp.2626
work_keys_str_mv AT peralesfrancisco continuityorchangehowtheonsetofcovid19affectedinternalmigrationinaustralia
AT bernardaude continuityorchangehowtheonsetofcovid19affectedinternalmigrationinaustralia