Cargando…

An 18‐month follow‐up of the Covid‐19 psychology research consortium study panel: Survey design and fieldwork procedures for Wave 6

OBJECTIVES: Established in March 2020, the C19PRC Study monitors the psychological and socio‐economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 6 (August–September 2021). METHODS: The survey assessed: COVID‐19 related experiences; experiences of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McBride, Orla, Butter, Sarah, Martinez, Anton P., Shevlin, Mark, Murphy, Jamie, Hartman, Todd K., McKay, Ryan, Hyland, Philip, Bennett, Kate M., Stocks, Thomas V. A., Gibson‐Miller, Jilly, Levita, Liat, Mason, Liam, Bentall, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1949
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Established in March 2020, the C19PRC Study monitors the psychological and socio‐economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 6 (August–September 2021). METHODS: The survey assessed: COVID‐19 related experiences; experiences of common mental health disorders; psychological characteristics; and social and political attitudes. Adult participants from any previous wave (N = 3170) were re‐invited, and sample replenishment procedures helped manage attrition. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the on‐going original panel (from baseline) was nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, amongst other factors. RESULTS: 1643 adults were re‐interviewed at Wave 6 (51.8% retention rate). Non‐participation was higher younger adults, those born outside UK, and adults living in cities. Of the adults recruited at baseline, 54.3% (N = 1100) participated in Wave 6. New respondent (N = 415) entered the panel at this wave, resulting in cross‐sectional sample for Wave 6 of 2058 adults. The raking procedure re‐balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1.3% of population estimates for selected socio‐demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This paper outlines the growing strength of the publicly available C19PRC Study data for COVID‐19‐related interdisciplinary research.