Cargando…
An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of extensive literature on the effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID‐19 outcomes, the evidence is still controversial. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36205627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13888 |
_version_ | 1784877845250572288 |
---|---|
author | Kurdi, Amanj Mueller, Tanja Weir, Natalie |
author_facet | Kurdi, Amanj Mueller, Tanja Weir, Natalie |
author_sort | Kurdi, Amanj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of extensive literature on the effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID‐19 outcomes, the evidence is still controversial. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID‐19‐related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence. METHODS: An umbrella review was conducted using Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1 February 2021. Systematic reviews with meta‐analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID‐19‐related clinical outcomes were eligible. Studies' quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using the random‐effects modelling including several subgroup analyses. Heterogenicity was assessed using I(2) statistic. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398) and reported using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID‐19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.75–0.86; I(2) = 51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.80–0.92; I(2) = 43.9%), severe COVID‐19 (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.78–0.95; I(2) = 68%) and hospitalisation (OR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.04–1.46; I(2) = 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.47–0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.63–0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Collective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor‐quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID‐19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID‐19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9874890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98748902023-01-25 An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes Kurdi, Amanj Mueller, Tanja Weir, Natalie Eur J Clin Invest Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of extensive literature on the effect of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID‐19 outcomes, the evidence is still controversial. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID‐19‐related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence. METHODS: An umbrella review was conducted using Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1 February 2021. Systematic reviews with meta‐analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID‐19‐related clinical outcomes were eligible. Studies' quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using the random‐effects modelling including several subgroup analyses. Heterogenicity was assessed using I(2) statistic. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398) and reported using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID‐19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.75–0.86; I(2) = 51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.80–0.92; I(2) = 43.9%), severe COVID‐19 (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.78–0.95; I(2) = 68%) and hospitalisation (OR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.04–1.46; I(2) = 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.47–0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.63–0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Collective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor‐quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID‐19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID‐19. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-19 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9874890/ /pubmed/36205627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13888 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Meta‐analysis Kurdi, Amanj Mueller, Tanja Weir, Natalie An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title | An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title_full | An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title_fullStr | An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title_short | An umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and COVID‐19 outcomes |
title_sort | umbrella review and meta‐analysis of renin–angiotensin system drugs use and covid‐19 outcomes |
topic | Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36205627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurdiamanj anumbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes AT muellertanja anumbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes AT weirnatalie anumbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes AT kurdiamanj umbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes AT muellertanja umbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes AT weirnatalie umbrellareviewandmetaanalysisofreninangiotensinsystemdrugsuseandcovid19outcomes |