Cargando…

Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-studied topic in child and adolescent psychiatry. ADHD diagnosis relies on information from an assessment scale used by teachers and parents and psychological assessment by physicians; however, the assessment results can be incons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, I-Cheng, Chang, Shen-Chieh, Huang, Yu-Jui, Kuo, Terry B. J., Chiu, Hung-Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067771
_version_ 1784877883077951488
author Lin, I-Cheng
Chang, Shen-Chieh
Huang, Yu-Jui
Kuo, Terry B. J.
Chiu, Hung-Wen
author_facet Lin, I-Cheng
Chang, Shen-Chieh
Huang, Yu-Jui
Kuo, Terry B. J.
Chiu, Hung-Wen
author_sort Lin, I-Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-studied topic in child and adolescent psychiatry. ADHD diagnosis relies on information from an assessment scale used by teachers and parents and psychological assessment by physicians; however, the assessment results can be inconsistent. PURPOSE: To construct models that automatically distinguish between children with predominantly inattentive-type ADHD (ADHD-I), with combined-type ADHD (ADHD-C), and without ADHD. METHODS: Clinical records with age 6–17 years-old, for January 2011–September 2020 were collected from local general hospitals in northern Taiwan; the data were based on the SNAP-IV scale, the second and third editions of Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and various intelligence tests. This study used an artificial neural network to construct the models. In addition, k-fold cross-validation was applied to ensure the consistency of the machine learning results. RESULTS: We collected 328 records using CPT-3 and 239 records using CPT-2. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I and ADHD-C, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 88.75 and 85.56% in the training and testing sets, respectively. The replacement of CPT-2 with CPT-3 results in this model yielded an overall accuracy of 90.46% in the training set and 89.44% in the testing set. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and the absence of ADHD, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 86.74 and 77.43% in the training and testing sets, respectively. CONCLUSION: This proposed model distinguished between the ADHD-I and ADHD-C groups with 85–90% accuracy, and it distinguished between the ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and control groups with 77–86% accuracy. The machine learning model helps clinicians identify patients with ADHD in a timely manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98750792023-01-26 Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test Lin, I-Cheng Chang, Shen-Chieh Huang, Yu-Jui Kuo, Terry B. J. Chiu, Hung-Wen Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a well-studied topic in child and adolescent psychiatry. ADHD diagnosis relies on information from an assessment scale used by teachers and parents and psychological assessment by physicians; however, the assessment results can be inconsistent. PURPOSE: To construct models that automatically distinguish between children with predominantly inattentive-type ADHD (ADHD-I), with combined-type ADHD (ADHD-C), and without ADHD. METHODS: Clinical records with age 6–17 years-old, for January 2011–September 2020 were collected from local general hospitals in northern Taiwan; the data were based on the SNAP-IV scale, the second and third editions of Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and various intelligence tests. This study used an artificial neural network to construct the models. In addition, k-fold cross-validation was applied to ensure the consistency of the machine learning results. RESULTS: We collected 328 records using CPT-3 and 239 records using CPT-2. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I and ADHD-C, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 88.75 and 85.56% in the training and testing sets, respectively. The replacement of CPT-2 with CPT-3 results in this model yielded an overall accuracy of 90.46% in the training set and 89.44% in the testing set. With regard to distinguishing between ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and the absence of ADHD, a combination of demographic information, SNAP-IV scale results, and CPT-2 results yielded overall accuracies of 86.74 and 77.43% in the training and testing sets, respectively. CONCLUSION: This proposed model distinguished between the ADHD-I and ADHD-C groups with 85–90% accuracy, and it distinguished between the ADHD-I, ADHD-C, and control groups with 77–86% accuracy. The machine learning model helps clinicians identify patients with ADHD in a timely manner. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9875079/ /pubmed/36710799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067771 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lin, Chang, Huang, Kuo and Chiu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lin, I-Cheng
Chang, Shen-Chieh
Huang, Yu-Jui
Kuo, Terry B. J.
Chiu, Hung-Wen
Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title_full Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title_fullStr Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title_full_unstemmed Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title_short Distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
title_sort distinguishing different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using artificial neural network with clinical intelligent test
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710799
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067771
work_keys_str_mv AT linicheng distinguishingdifferenttypesofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinchildrenusingartificialneuralnetworkwithclinicalintelligenttest
AT changshenchieh distinguishingdifferenttypesofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinchildrenusingartificialneuralnetworkwithclinicalintelligenttest
AT huangyujui distinguishingdifferenttypesofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinchildrenusingartificialneuralnetworkwithclinicalintelligenttest
AT kuoterrybj distinguishingdifferenttypesofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinchildrenusingartificialneuralnetworkwithclinicalintelligenttest
AT chiuhungwen distinguishingdifferenttypesofattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderinchildrenusingartificialneuralnetworkwithclinicalintelligenttest