Cargando…

Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Bernadette E., Rice, Kylie, Murray, Clara V., Thorsteinsson, Einar B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w
_version_ 1784877909809299456
author Harris, Bernadette E.
Rice, Kylie
Murray, Clara V.
Thorsteinsson, Einar B.
author_facet Harris, Bernadette E.
Rice, Kylie
Murray, Clara V.
Thorsteinsson, Einar B.
author_sort Harris, Bernadette E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder mapped directly to the new ICD-11 criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of both instruments in an Australian sample of adult oncology patients.  METHODS: A total of 405 participants with a cancer diagnosis were recruited online from across Australia. Participants reported cancer-specific information, such as time since diagnosis, treatment stage, cancer stage, type of cancer, and the following questionnaires: 8-item Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-8), the World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The predictiveness of stressors was assessed using multiple regression analysis and the structure of the ADNM-8 and the ADNM-4 was tested using confirmatory factor analysis.  RESULTS: Six previously tested models were examined, and the results suggested a 2-factor structure reflecting the two ICD-11 diagnostic criteria clusters of preoccupation with the stressor and failure to adapt was a good fit for both scales. The ADNM-4 outperformed the longer version of the scale on numerous fit indices though the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 were highly correlated. Correlations of both scales with the psychological distress scale, the stress subscale, and the wellbeing index indicated good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful screening tools for assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. The prompt screening of cancer patients encourages early intervention for those at risk of adaptation difficulties and informs research and clinical decisions regarding appropriate treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98751902023-01-25 Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients Harris, Bernadette E. Rice, Kylie Murray, Clara V. Thorsteinsson, Einar B. Biopsychosoc Med Research BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder mapped directly to the new ICD-11 criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of both instruments in an Australian sample of adult oncology patients.  METHODS: A total of 405 participants with a cancer diagnosis were recruited online from across Australia. Participants reported cancer-specific information, such as time since diagnosis, treatment stage, cancer stage, type of cancer, and the following questionnaires: 8-item Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-8), the World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The predictiveness of stressors was assessed using multiple regression analysis and the structure of the ADNM-8 and the ADNM-4 was tested using confirmatory factor analysis.  RESULTS: Six previously tested models were examined, and the results suggested a 2-factor structure reflecting the two ICD-11 diagnostic criteria clusters of preoccupation with the stressor and failure to adapt was a good fit for both scales. The ADNM-4 outperformed the longer version of the scale on numerous fit indices though the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 were highly correlated. Correlations of both scales with the psychological distress scale, the stress subscale, and the wellbeing index indicated good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful screening tools for assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. The prompt screening of cancer patients encourages early intervention for those at risk of adaptation difficulties and informs research and clinical decisions regarding appropriate treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w. BioMed Central 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9875190/ /pubmed/36698144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Harris, Bernadette E.
Rice, Kylie
Murray, Clara V.
Thorsteinsson, Einar B.
Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title_full Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title_fullStr Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title_short Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients
title_sort validation of the brief adjustment disorder new modules with australian oncology patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisbernadettee validationofthebriefadjustmentdisordernewmoduleswithaustralianoncologypatients
AT ricekylie validationofthebriefadjustmentdisordernewmoduleswithaustralianoncologypatients
AT murrayclarav validationofthebriefadjustmentdisordernewmoduleswithaustralianoncologypatients
AT thorsteinssoneinarb validationofthebriefadjustmentdisordernewmoduleswithaustralianoncologypatients