Cargando…
An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment
OBJECTIVES: To provide concise information to clinicians on how to better interpret multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 2 separate cohorts. For patients receiving a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000140 |
_version_ | 1784877912631017472 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Parth U. Bock, David Hettinger, Christian A. |
author_facet | Patel, Parth U. Bock, David Hettinger, Christian A. |
author_sort | Patel, Parth U. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To provide concise information to clinicians on how to better interpret multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 2 separate cohorts. For patients receiving a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) score of 1 or 2, we reviewed the charts of 226 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate ordered from 2015 to 2017 to determine who developed clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by August 27, 2020. For patients receiving PI-RADSv2 a score of 3, 4, or 5, we reviewed the results of 733 fusion biopsies on solitary lesions. Statistical analysis was used to further determine risk factors for csPCa. RESULTS: Ten percent of men with PI-RADSv2 a score of 1 eventually developed csPCa. Seven percent with a score of 2 were eventually diagnosed with csPCa. Only 1 of 226 with a score of 1 or 2 developed metastasis. For PI-RADSv2 scores of 3, 4, and 5, csPCa was detected in 16%, 45%, and 67% of fusion biopsies. Peripheral zone (PZ) PI-RADSv2 score of 4 or 5 and prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D) were significant predictors of csPCa on multivariable analysis. Using a PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score of ≤0.39, we identified 38% of men with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 in the PZ or 3, 4, or 5 in the transition zone who could have avoided a benign biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients with PI-RADSv2 scores 1 and 2 can be safely monitored with close surveillance. Lesions with PI-RADSv2 scores of 4 and 5 in the PZ should be biopsied. Peripheral zone lesions with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 and transition zone lesions with 3, 4, or 5 can be risk-stratified using the PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score to determine who may safely avoid a biopsy and who should proceed to fusion biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9875202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98752022023-01-26 An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment Patel, Parth U. Bock, David Hettinger, Christian A. Curr Urol Special Topic: Advances in Prostate Cancer Therapy: Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To provide concise information to clinicians on how to better interpret multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer risk stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 2 separate cohorts. For patients receiving a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) score of 1 or 2, we reviewed the charts of 226 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate ordered from 2015 to 2017 to determine who developed clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by August 27, 2020. For patients receiving PI-RADSv2 a score of 3, 4, or 5, we reviewed the results of 733 fusion biopsies on solitary lesions. Statistical analysis was used to further determine risk factors for csPCa. RESULTS: Ten percent of men with PI-RADSv2 a score of 1 eventually developed csPCa. Seven percent with a score of 2 were eventually diagnosed with csPCa. Only 1 of 226 with a score of 1 or 2 developed metastasis. For PI-RADSv2 scores of 3, 4, and 5, csPCa was detected in 16%, 45%, and 67% of fusion biopsies. Peripheral zone (PZ) PI-RADSv2 score of 4 or 5 and prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D) were significant predictors of csPCa on multivariable analysis. Using a PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score of ≤0.39, we identified 38% of men with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 in the PZ or 3, 4, or 5 in the transition zone who could have avoided a benign biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients with PI-RADSv2 scores 1 and 2 can be safely monitored with close surveillance. Lesions with PI-RADSv2 scores of 4 and 5 in the PZ should be biopsied. Peripheral zone lesions with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 and transition zone lesions with 3, 4, or 5 can be risk-stratified using the PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score to determine who may safely avoid a biopsy and who should proceed to fusion biopsy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9875202/ /pubmed/36714236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000140 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Special Topic: Advances in Prostate Cancer Therapy: Original Articles Patel, Parth U. Bock, David Hettinger, Christian A. An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title | An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title_full | An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title_fullStr | An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title_short | An independent practice validation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 scoring system and the introduction of PDP (prostate-specific antigen density × PI-RADSv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
title_sort | independent practice validation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 scoring system and the introduction of pdp (prostate-specific antigen density × pi-radsv2) score to assist with further risk assessment |
topic | Special Topic: Advances in Prostate Cancer Therapy: Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelparthu anindependentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment AT bockdavid anindependentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment AT hettingerchristiana anindependentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment AT patelparthu independentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment AT bockdavid independentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment AT hettingerchristiana independentpracticevalidationoftheprostateimagingreportinganddatasystemversion2scoringsystemandtheintroductionofpdpprostatespecificantigendensitypiradsv2scoretoassistwithfurtherriskassessment |