Cargando…
A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003 |
_version_ | 1784877918657183744 |
---|---|
author | Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira Chedid, Márcio Fernandes Isolan, Paola Santis Takamatu, Eliziane Emy Lucena, Ronaldo Albé Feier, Flavia Heinz Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares |
author_facet | Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira Chedid, Márcio Fernandes Isolan, Paola Santis Takamatu, Eliziane Emy Lucena, Ronaldo Albé Feier, Flavia Heinz Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares |
author_sort | Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. RESULTS: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9875229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98752292023-01-26 A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira Chedid, Márcio Fernandes Isolan, Paola Santis Takamatu, Eliziane Emy Lucena, Ronaldo Albé Feier, Flavia Heinz Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares J Pediatr (Rio J) Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. RESULTS: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population. Elsevier 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9875229/ /pubmed/35718001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003 Text en © 2022 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira Chedid, Márcio Fernandes Isolan, Paola Santis Takamatu, Eliziane Emy Lucena, Ronaldo Albé Feier, Flavia Heinz Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title | A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title_full | A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title_fullStr | A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title_short | A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
title_sort | comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucenaiarareginasiqueira acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT chedidmarciofernandes acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT isolanpaolasantis acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT takamatuelizianeemy acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT lucenaronaldoalbe acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT feierflaviaheinz acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT furtadoalvaroportoalegre acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT defragajosecarlossoares acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT lucenaiarareginasiqueira comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT chedidmarciofernandes comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT isolanpaolasantis comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT takamatuelizianeemy comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT lucenaronaldoalbe comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT feierflaviaheinz comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT furtadoalvaroportoalegre comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren AT defragajosecarlossoares comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren |