Cargando…

A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira, Chedid, Márcio Fernandes, Isolan, Paola Santis, Takamatu, Eliziane Emy, Lucena, Ronaldo Albé, Feier, Flavia Heinz, Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre, de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003
_version_ 1784877918657183744
author Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira
Chedid, Márcio Fernandes
Isolan, Paola Santis
Takamatu, Eliziane Emy
Lucena, Ronaldo Albé
Feier, Flavia Heinz
Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre
de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares
author_facet Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira
Chedid, Márcio Fernandes
Isolan, Paola Santis
Takamatu, Eliziane Emy
Lucena, Ronaldo Albé
Feier, Flavia Heinz
Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre
de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares
author_sort Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. RESULTS: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98752292023-01-26 A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children() Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira Chedid, Márcio Fernandes Isolan, Paola Santis Takamatu, Eliziane Emy Lucena, Ronaldo Albé Feier, Flavia Heinz Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares J Pediatr (Rio J) Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the performance of single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations in the preoperative evaluation of solid abdominal tumors and their relationship with relevant adjacent structures in children. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 pediatric patients with malignant solid abdominal tumors treated with surgical resection between 2009-2017. Preoperative computed tomography and ultrasonography were compared to operative findings (gold standard) in the diagnosis of invasion or encasement of adjacent structures. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. RESULTS: Renal (20.4%) and neuroblastic (19.4%) tumors were the most common. Complete surgical resection with negative margins was achieved in 44 (88%) patients. The comparison between single-phase-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography findings showed the following results: sensitivity = 90.3% vs 86.6%, specificity = 86.8% vs 94.6%, negative predictive value = 95.3% vs 94.4%, positive predictive value = 75.3% vs 86.9%, and accuracy = 87.9% vs 92.2%. The correlation (kappa index) between computed tomography and ultrasonography examinations was 0.72 (p < 0.001). In 14% (7/50) of the patients, the invasion of adjacent structures was diagnosed by ultrasonography but not by computed tomography (1 patient had 2 invaded structures). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography can be considered a complementary method to single-phase-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of children with an abdominal tumor. The present study showed that ultrasonography and single-phase-enhanced computed tomography each possess a high accuracy in the preoperative planning of resection of solid abdominal tumors in children. Thus, it seems that the combination of both imaging methods would be enough for the evaluation of most abdominal tumors in the pediatric population. Elsevier 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9875229/ /pubmed/35718001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003 Text en © 2022 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lucena, Iara Regina Siqueira
Chedid, Márcio Fernandes
Isolan, Paola Santis
Takamatu, Eliziane Emy
Lucena, Ronaldo Albé
Feier, Flavia Heinz
Furtado, Álvaro Porto Alegre
de Fraga, Jose Carlos Soares
A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title_full A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title_fullStr A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title_short A comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
title_sort comparison between ultrasonography and single-phase computed tomography for preoperative assessment of solid abdominal tumors in children()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35718001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2022.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT lucenaiarareginasiqueira acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT chedidmarciofernandes acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT isolanpaolasantis acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT takamatuelizianeemy acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT lucenaronaldoalbe acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT feierflaviaheinz acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT furtadoalvaroportoalegre acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT defragajosecarlossoares acomparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT lucenaiarareginasiqueira comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT chedidmarciofernandes comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT isolanpaolasantis comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT takamatuelizianeemy comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT lucenaronaldoalbe comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT feierflaviaheinz comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT furtadoalvaroportoalegre comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren
AT defragajosecarlossoares comparisonbetweenultrasonographyandsinglephasecomputedtomographyforpreoperativeassessmentofsolidabdominaltumorsinchildren