Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 newly designed toothbrushes used by elderly individuals based on plaque removal and gingival inflammation reduction compared with 2 commercially available toothbrushes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled, singl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitipong, Virunpat, Laiteerapong, Arunee, Lochaiwatana, Yossakit, Arunyanak, Sirikarn P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.001
_version_ 1784877926995460096
author Nitipong, Virunpat
Laiteerapong, Arunee
Lochaiwatana, Yossakit
Arunyanak, Sirikarn P.
author_facet Nitipong, Virunpat
Laiteerapong, Arunee
Lochaiwatana, Yossakit
Arunyanak, Sirikarn P.
author_sort Nitipong, Virunpat
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 newly designed toothbrushes used by elderly individuals based on plaque removal and gingival inflammation reduction compared with 2 commercially available toothbrushes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled, single-blind, 4-period crossover clinical trial. Thirty elderly participants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into 4 groups, which determined the sequence of the 4 toothbrushes: CUdent/extra soft, CUdent/soft, GoodAge, and Colgate. The participants’ baseline bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) were assessed by one blinded calibrated examiner, then their teeth were professionally cleaned. The participants were assigned to use the tested toothbrush and were recalled for postbrushing examination 2 weeks later to evaluate their BOP and PI. At the end of each test period, the participants used their own toothbrush during the 2-week washout period before using the next tested toothbrush. RESULTS: The mean age of the 30 participants was 63.2 years. The mean baseline BOP score was 44.4%, and mean baseline PI was 2.7. Three participants dropped out; thus, 27 participants (15 females and 12 males) provided data throughout the study period. The participant characteristics and baseline data between the groups were similar. CUdent/extra soft and CUdent/soft demonstrated significantly better PI scores at the buccal surfaces than GoodAge (P < .05). CUdent/soft had the lowest PI scores and Colgate presented the lowest BOP score in every comparison for other areas; however, the differences were not significant. No signs of tissue trauma or abrasion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The newly designed toothbrushes were comparable to the commercially available toothbrushes in plaque removal efficacy and reducing gingival inflammation. CUdent/extra soft and soft were significantly more effective in plaque removal in the buccal regions than GoodAge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98752632023-01-26 Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study Nitipong, Virunpat Laiteerapong, Arunee Lochaiwatana, Yossakit Arunyanak, Sirikarn P. Int Dent J Scientific Research Report OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 newly designed toothbrushes used by elderly individuals based on plaque removal and gingival inflammation reduction compared with 2 commercially available toothbrushes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomised, controlled, single-blind, 4-period crossover clinical trial. Thirty elderly participants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into 4 groups, which determined the sequence of the 4 toothbrushes: CUdent/extra soft, CUdent/soft, GoodAge, and Colgate. The participants’ baseline bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) were assessed by one blinded calibrated examiner, then their teeth were professionally cleaned. The participants were assigned to use the tested toothbrush and were recalled for postbrushing examination 2 weeks later to evaluate their BOP and PI. At the end of each test period, the participants used their own toothbrush during the 2-week washout period before using the next tested toothbrush. RESULTS: The mean age of the 30 participants was 63.2 years. The mean baseline BOP score was 44.4%, and mean baseline PI was 2.7. Three participants dropped out; thus, 27 participants (15 females and 12 males) provided data throughout the study period. The participant characteristics and baseline data between the groups were similar. CUdent/extra soft and CUdent/soft demonstrated significantly better PI scores at the buccal surfaces than GoodAge (P < .05). CUdent/soft had the lowest PI scores and Colgate presented the lowest BOP score in every comparison for other areas; however, the differences were not significant. No signs of tissue trauma or abrasion were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The newly designed toothbrushes were comparable to the commercially available toothbrushes in plaque removal efficacy and reducing gingival inflammation. CUdent/extra soft and soft were significantly more effective in plaque removal in the buccal regions than GoodAge. Elsevier 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9875263/ /pubmed/36435664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Research Report
Nitipong, Virunpat
Laiteerapong, Arunee
Lochaiwatana, Yossakit
Arunyanak, Sirikarn P.
Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study
title_sort clinical evaluation of toothbrushes for elderly patients: a crossover study
topic Scientific Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT nitipongvirunpat clinicalevaluationoftoothbrushesforelderlypatientsacrossoverstudy
AT laiteerapongarunee clinicalevaluationoftoothbrushesforelderlypatientsacrossoverstudy
AT lochaiwatanayossakit clinicalevaluationoftoothbrushesforelderlypatientsacrossoverstudy
AT arunyanaksirikarnp clinicalevaluationoftoothbrushesforelderlypatientsacrossoverstudy