Cargando…

A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: 70%–80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision‐making. AIM: We assessed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagaskar, Vinayak G., Levy, Micah, Ratnani, Parita, Sullimada, Sharmila, Gerenia, Mae, Schlussel, Kacie, Choudhury, Samia, Gabriele, Marla, Haas, Ian, Haines, Kenneth, Tewari, Ash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1668
_version_ 1784878014195040256
author Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Levy, Micah
Ratnani, Parita
Sullimada, Sharmila
Gerenia, Mae
Schlussel, Kacie
Choudhury, Samia
Gabriele, Marla
Haas, Ian
Haines, Kenneth
Tewari, Ash
author_facet Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Levy, Micah
Ratnani, Parita
Sullimada, Sharmila
Gerenia, Mae
Schlussel, Kacie
Choudhury, Samia
Gabriele, Marla
Haas, Ian
Haines, Kenneth
Tewari, Ash
author_sort Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 70%–80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision‐making. AIM: We assessed the utility and accuracy of combining Select MDx and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scores for predicting risk of PCa. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our study was conducted at Mount Sinai hospital at Urology department in New York City from January 2020 to April 2021. Total 129 men performed select MDx test. Indications for prostate biopsy were high‐risk Select MDx score, suspicious DRE, PI‐RADS scores 3/4/5 on mpMRI, or any combination of these. Fifty‐one percentage of 129 patients underwent systemic or combined systemic and MRI/US (ultrasound) fusion biopsy; All men underwent 3 T MRI of Prostate w/wo contrast using standard protocols prior to biopsy. A single surgeon performed prostate biopsies. Gleason score ≥3 + 3 on biopsy is defined as outcome. Descriptive statistics were calculated as cross tables. Binary logistic regression model is used to determine the outcome. The nomogram was based on the coefficients of the logit function. ROCs were plotted and decision curve analysis was performed. Using both high‐risk Select MDx and PI‐RADS scores of 4/5, 87% of biopsies could have been avoided, while detecting 64% of PCa and missing 36%. If biopsies were performed on men with positive Select MDx or PI‐RADS 4/5 results, 16% of biopsies could have been avoided while detecting all PCa. Combining these scores improved specificity and accuracy for the detection of PCa over either used alone. Study limitations include limited sample size, sole institution study, and risk or overfitting for the proposed model which may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION: Combining SelectMDx and mpMRI PI‐PADS scores of 4/5 may be useful for PCa biopsy decision‐making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98756852023-01-25 A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer Wagaskar, Vinayak G. Levy, Micah Ratnani, Parita Sullimada, Sharmila Gerenia, Mae Schlussel, Kacie Choudhury, Samia Gabriele, Marla Haas, Ian Haines, Kenneth Tewari, Ash Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: 70%–80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision‐making. AIM: We assessed the utility and accuracy of combining Select MDx and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scores for predicting risk of PCa. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our study was conducted at Mount Sinai hospital at Urology department in New York City from January 2020 to April 2021. Total 129 men performed select MDx test. Indications for prostate biopsy were high‐risk Select MDx score, suspicious DRE, PI‐RADS scores 3/4/5 on mpMRI, or any combination of these. Fifty‐one percentage of 129 patients underwent systemic or combined systemic and MRI/US (ultrasound) fusion biopsy; All men underwent 3 T MRI of Prostate w/wo contrast using standard protocols prior to biopsy. A single surgeon performed prostate biopsies. Gleason score ≥3 + 3 on biopsy is defined as outcome. Descriptive statistics were calculated as cross tables. Binary logistic regression model is used to determine the outcome. The nomogram was based on the coefficients of the logit function. ROCs were plotted and decision curve analysis was performed. Using both high‐risk Select MDx and PI‐RADS scores of 4/5, 87% of biopsies could have been avoided, while detecting 64% of PCa and missing 36%. If biopsies were performed on men with positive Select MDx or PI‐RADS 4/5 results, 16% of biopsies could have been avoided while detecting all PCa. Combining these scores improved specificity and accuracy for the detection of PCa over either used alone. Study limitations include limited sample size, sole institution study, and risk or overfitting for the proposed model which may limit generalizability. CONCLUSION: Combining SelectMDx and mpMRI PI‐PADS scores of 4/5 may be useful for PCa biopsy decision‐making. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9875685/ /pubmed/36168681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1668 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Levy, Micah
Ratnani, Parita
Sullimada, Sharmila
Gerenia, Mae
Schlussel, Kacie
Choudhury, Samia
Gabriele, Marla
Haas, Ian
Haines, Kenneth
Tewari, Ash
A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title_full A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title_fullStr A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title_short A SelectMDx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
title_sort selectmdx/magnetic resonance imaging‐based nomogram to diagnose prostate cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1668
work_keys_str_mv AT wagaskarvinayakg aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT levymicah aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT ratnaniparita aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT sullimadasharmila aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT gereniamae aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT schlusselkacie aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT choudhurysamia aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT gabrielemarla aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT haasian aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT haineskenneth aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT tewariash aselectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT wagaskarvinayakg selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT levymicah selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT ratnaniparita selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT sullimadasharmila selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT gereniamae selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT schlusselkacie selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT choudhurysamia selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT gabrielemarla selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT haasian selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT haineskenneth selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer
AT tewariash selectmdxmagneticresonanceimagingbasednomogramtodiagnoseprostatecancer