Cargando…
Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy
PURPOSE: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721485 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00028 |
_version_ | 1784878036588429312 |
---|---|
author | Halthore, Aditya Fellows, Zachary Tran, Anh Deville, Curtiland Wright, Jean L. Meyer, Jeffrey Li, Heng Sheikh, Khadija |
author_facet | Halthore, Aditya Fellows, Zachary Tran, Anh Deville, Curtiland Wright, Jean L. Meyer, Jeffrey Li, Heng Sheikh, Khadija |
author_sort | Halthore, Aditya |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. RESULTS: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm(3). Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P = .02; 3-cm spacing, P = .01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .004; 3-cm spacing, P = .002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .03; 3-cm spacing, P = .02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .03; 3-cm spacing, P = .02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. CONCLUSIONS: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9875826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98758262023-01-30 Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy Halthore, Aditya Fellows, Zachary Tran, Anh Deville, Curtiland Wright, Jean L. Meyer, Jeffrey Li, Heng Sheikh, Khadija Int J Part Ther Original Articles PURPOSE: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. RESULTS: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm(3). Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P = .02; 3-cm spacing, P = .01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .004; 3-cm spacing, P = .002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .03; 3-cm spacing, P = .02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P = .03; 3-cm spacing, P = .02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. CONCLUSIONS: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease. The Particle Therapy Co-operative Group 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9875826/ /pubmed/36721485 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00028 Text en ©Copyright 2022 The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY. Open Access (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Halthore, Aditya Fellows, Zachary Tran, Anh Deville, Curtiland Wright, Jean L. Meyer, Jeffrey Li, Heng Sheikh, Khadija Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title | Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title_full | Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title_fullStr | Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title_short | Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy |
title_sort | treatment planning of bulky tumors using pencil beam scanning proton grid therapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36721485 http://dx.doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-22-00028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halthoreaditya treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT fellowszachary treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT trananh treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT devillecurtiland treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT wrightjeanl treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT meyerjeffrey treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT liheng treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy AT sheikhkhadija treatmentplanningofbulkytumorsusingpencilbeamscanningprotongridtherapy |