Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kammer, Michael N., Maldonado, Fabien, Deppen, Steve A., Baron, Anna, Grogan, Eric L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Thoracic Society 2022
Materias:
Correspondence
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202201-0082LE
_version_ 1784878049909538816
author Kammer, Michael N.
Maldonado, Fabien
Deppen, Steve A.
Baron, Anna
Grogan, Eric L.
author_facet Kammer, Michael N.
Maldonado, Fabien
Deppen, Steve A.
Baron, Anna
Grogan, Eric L.
author_sort Kammer, Michael N.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Thoracic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98759032023-01-26 Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions? Kammer, Michael N. Maldonado, Fabien Deppen, Steve A. Baron, Anna Grogan, Eric L. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Correspondence American Thoracic Society 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9875903/ /pubmed/35373716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202201-0082LE Text en Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern (dgern@thoracic.org).
spellingShingle Correspondence
Kammer, Michael N.
Maldonado, Fabien
Deppen, Steve A.
Baron, Anna
Grogan, Eric L.
Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title_full Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title_fullStr Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title_full_unstemmed Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title_short Reply to Zhao et al.: Integrated Biomarkers for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules: Is 2-Year Imaging Follow-Up Enough for Suspected Benign Lesions?
title_sort reply to zhao et al.: integrated biomarkers for indeterminate pulmonary nodules: is 2-year imaging follow-up enough for suspected benign lesions?
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202201-0082LE
work_keys_str_mv AT kammermichaeln replytozhaoetalintegratedbiomarkersforindeterminatepulmonarynodulesis2yearimagingfollowupenoughforsuspectedbenignlesions
AT maldonadofabien replytozhaoetalintegratedbiomarkersforindeterminatepulmonarynodulesis2yearimagingfollowupenoughforsuspectedbenignlesions
AT deppenstevea replytozhaoetalintegratedbiomarkersforindeterminatepulmonarynodulesis2yearimagingfollowupenoughforsuspectedbenignlesions
AT baronanna replytozhaoetalintegratedbiomarkersforindeterminatepulmonarynodulesis2yearimagingfollowupenoughforsuspectedbenignlesions
AT groganericl replytozhaoetalintegratedbiomarkersforindeterminatepulmonarynodulesis2yearimagingfollowupenoughforsuspectedbenignlesions

Ejemplares similares