Cargando…

Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis

Brain morphometry is usually based on non‐enhanced (pre‐contrast) T1‐weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebsamen, Michael, McKinley, Richard, Radojewski, Piotr, Pistor, Maximilian, Friedli, Christoph, Hoepner, Robert, Salmen, Anke, Chan, Andrew, Reyes, Mauricio, Wagner, Franca, Wiest, Roland, Rummel, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26117
_version_ 1784878056324726784
author Rebsamen, Michael
McKinley, Richard
Radojewski, Piotr
Pistor, Maximilian
Friedli, Christoph
Hoepner, Robert
Salmen, Anke
Chan, Andrew
Reyes, Mauricio
Wagner, Franca
Wiest, Roland
Rummel, Christian
author_facet Rebsamen, Michael
McKinley, Richard
Radojewski, Piotr
Pistor, Maximilian
Friedli, Christoph
Hoepner, Robert
Salmen, Anke
Chan, Andrew
Reyes, Mauricio
Wagner, Franca
Wiest, Roland
Rummel, Christian
author_sort Rebsamen, Michael
collection PubMed
description Brain morphometry is usually based on non‐enhanced (pre‐contrast) T1‐weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to contrast‐enhanced (CE) images. Consequently, these acquisitions are excluded from retrospective morphometry studies, which reduces the sample size. We hypothesize that deep learning (DL)‐based morphometry methods can extract morphometric measures also from contrast‐enhanced MRI. We have extended DL+DiReCT to cope with contrast‐enhanced MRI. Training data for our DL‐based model were enriched with non‐enhanced and CE image pairs from the same session. The segmentations were derived with FreeSurfer from the non‐enhanced image and used as ground truth for the coregistered CE image. A longitudinal dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising relapsing remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) subgroups, was used for the evaluation. Global and regional cortical thickness derived from non‐enhanced and CE images were contrasted to results from FreeSurfer. Correlation coefficients of global mean cortical thickness between non‐enhanced and CE images were significantly larger with DL+DiReCT (r = 0.92) than with FreeSurfer (r = 0.75). When comparing the longitudinal atrophy rates between the two MS subgroups, the effect sizes between PPMS and RRMS were higher with DL+DiReCT both for non‐enhanced (d = −0.304) and CE images (d = −0.169) than for FreeSurfer (non‐enhanced d = −0.111, CE d = 0.085). In conclusion, brain morphometry can be derived reliably from contrast‐enhanced MRI using DL‐based morphometry tools, making additional cases available for analysis and potential future diagnostic morphometry tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98759322023-01-25 Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis Rebsamen, Michael McKinley, Richard Radojewski, Piotr Pistor, Maximilian Friedli, Christoph Hoepner, Robert Salmen, Anke Chan, Andrew Reyes, Mauricio Wagner, Franca Wiest, Roland Rummel, Christian Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Brain morphometry is usually based on non‐enhanced (pre‐contrast) T1‐weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to contrast‐enhanced (CE) images. Consequently, these acquisitions are excluded from retrospective morphometry studies, which reduces the sample size. We hypothesize that deep learning (DL)‐based morphometry methods can extract morphometric measures also from contrast‐enhanced MRI. We have extended DL+DiReCT to cope with contrast‐enhanced MRI. Training data for our DL‐based model were enriched with non‐enhanced and CE image pairs from the same session. The segmentations were derived with FreeSurfer from the non‐enhanced image and used as ground truth for the coregistered CE image. A longitudinal dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising relapsing remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) subgroups, was used for the evaluation. Global and regional cortical thickness derived from non‐enhanced and CE images were contrasted to results from FreeSurfer. Correlation coefficients of global mean cortical thickness between non‐enhanced and CE images were significantly larger with DL+DiReCT (r = 0.92) than with FreeSurfer (r = 0.75). When comparing the longitudinal atrophy rates between the two MS subgroups, the effect sizes between PPMS and RRMS were higher with DL+DiReCT both for non‐enhanced (d = −0.304) and CE images (d = −0.169) than for FreeSurfer (non‐enhanced d = −0.111, CE d = 0.085). In conclusion, brain morphometry can be derived reliably from contrast‐enhanced MRI using DL‐based morphometry tools, making additional cases available for analysis and potential future diagnostic morphometry tools. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9875932/ /pubmed/36250711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26117 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rebsamen, Michael
McKinley, Richard
Radojewski, Piotr
Pistor, Maximilian
Friedli, Christoph
Hoepner, Robert
Salmen, Anke
Chan, Andrew
Reyes, Mauricio
Wagner, Franca
Wiest, Roland
Rummel, Christian
Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short Reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced T1w‐MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort reliable brain morphometry from contrast‐enhanced t1w‐mri in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26117
work_keys_str_mv AT rebsamenmichael reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT mckinleyrichard reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT radojewskipiotr reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT pistormaximilian reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT friedlichristoph reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT hoepnerrobert reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT salmenanke reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT chanandrew reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT reyesmauricio reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT wagnerfranca reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT wiestroland reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT rummelchristian reliablebrainmorphometryfromcontrastenhancedt1wmriinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis