Cargando…
Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116 |
_version_ | 1784878058054877184 |
---|---|
author | Mei, Dongmei Ke, Zijun Li, Zhihao Zhang, Wenjian Gao, Dingguo Yin, Lijun |
author_facet | Mei, Dongmei Ke, Zijun Li, Zhihao Zhang, Wenjian Gao, Dingguo Yin, Lijun |
author_sort | Mei, Dongmei |
collection | PubMed |
description | As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐diminishing. Study 1 (N = 152) captured self‐deception by adopting a modified numerical discrimination task that provided cheating opportunities, quantifying errors in predicting future performance (via item‐response theory model), and measuring the belief of how good they are at solving the task (i.e., self‐efficacy belief). By examining whether self‐efficacy belief is based upon actual ability (true belief) or prediction errors (false belief), Study 1 showed that self‐deception occurred in the effortless (easier access to answer cues) rather than effortful (harder access to answer cues) cheating opportunity conditions, suggesting high ambiguity in attributions facilitates self‐deception. Studies 2 and 3 probed the neural source of self‐deception, linking self‐deception with the metacognitive process. Both studies replicated behavioral results from Study 1. Study 2 (ERP study; N = 55) found that the amplitude of frontal slow wave significantly differed between participants with positive/self‐enhancing and negative/self‐diminishing self‐deceiving tendencies in incorrect predictions while remaining similar in correct predictions. Study 3 (functional magnetic resonance imaging study; N = 33) identified self‐deceiving associated activity in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex and showed that effortless cheating context increased cheating behaviors that further facilitated self‐deception. Our findings suggest self‐deception is a false belief associated with a distorted metacognitive mental process that requires ambiguity in attributions of behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9875939 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98759392023-01-25 Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts Mei, Dongmei Ke, Zijun Li, Zhihao Zhang, Wenjian Gao, Dingguo Yin, Lijun Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐diminishing. Study 1 (N = 152) captured self‐deception by adopting a modified numerical discrimination task that provided cheating opportunities, quantifying errors in predicting future performance (via item‐response theory model), and measuring the belief of how good they are at solving the task (i.e., self‐efficacy belief). By examining whether self‐efficacy belief is based upon actual ability (true belief) or prediction errors (false belief), Study 1 showed that self‐deception occurred in the effortless (easier access to answer cues) rather than effortful (harder access to answer cues) cheating opportunity conditions, suggesting high ambiguity in attributions facilitates self‐deception. Studies 2 and 3 probed the neural source of self‐deception, linking self‐deception with the metacognitive process. Both studies replicated behavioral results from Study 1. Study 2 (ERP study; N = 55) found that the amplitude of frontal slow wave significantly differed between participants with positive/self‐enhancing and negative/self‐diminishing self‐deceiving tendencies in incorrect predictions while remaining similar in correct predictions. Study 3 (functional magnetic resonance imaging study; N = 33) identified self‐deceiving associated activity in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex and showed that effortless cheating context increased cheating behaviors that further facilitated self‐deception. Our findings suggest self‐deception is a false belief associated with a distorted metacognitive mental process that requires ambiguity in attributions of behaviors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9875939/ /pubmed/36308407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Mei, Dongmei Ke, Zijun Li, Zhihao Zhang, Wenjian Gao, Dingguo Yin, Lijun Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title | Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title_full | Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title_fullStr | Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title_full_unstemmed | Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title_short | Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
title_sort | self‐deception: distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875939/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meidongmei selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts AT kezijun selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts AT lizhihao selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts AT zhangwenjian selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts AT gaodingguo selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts AT yinlijun selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts |