Cargando…

Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts

As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei, Dongmei, Ke, Zijun, Li, Zhihao, Zhang, Wenjian, Gao, Dingguo, Yin, Lijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116
_version_ 1784878058054877184
author Mei, Dongmei
Ke, Zijun
Li, Zhihao
Zhang, Wenjian
Gao, Dingguo
Yin, Lijun
author_facet Mei, Dongmei
Ke, Zijun
Li, Zhihao
Zhang, Wenjian
Gao, Dingguo
Yin, Lijun
author_sort Mei, Dongmei
collection PubMed
description As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐diminishing. Study 1 (N = 152) captured self‐deception by adopting a modified numerical discrimination task that provided cheating opportunities, quantifying errors in predicting future performance (via item‐response theory model), and measuring the belief of how good they are at solving the task (i.e., self‐efficacy belief). By examining whether self‐efficacy belief is based upon actual ability (true belief) or prediction errors (false belief), Study 1 showed that self‐deception occurred in the effortless (easier access to answer cues) rather than effortful (harder access to answer cues) cheating opportunity conditions, suggesting high ambiguity in attributions facilitates self‐deception. Studies 2 and 3 probed the neural source of self‐deception, linking self‐deception with the metacognitive process. Both studies replicated behavioral results from Study 1. Study 2 (ERP study; N = 55) found that the amplitude of frontal slow wave significantly differed between participants with positive/self‐enhancing and negative/self‐diminishing self‐deceiving tendencies in incorrect predictions while remaining similar in correct predictions. Study 3 (functional magnetic resonance imaging study; N = 33) identified self‐deceiving associated activity in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex and showed that effortless cheating context increased cheating behaviors that further facilitated self‐deception. Our findings suggest self‐deception is a false belief associated with a distorted metacognitive mental process that requires ambiguity in attributions of behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9875939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98759392023-01-25 Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts Mei, Dongmei Ke, Zijun Li, Zhihao Zhang, Wenjian Gao, Dingguo Yin, Lijun Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles As one of the commonly used folk psychological concepts, self‐deception has been intensively discussed yet is short of solid ground from cognitive neuroscience. Self‐deception is a biased cognitive process of information to obtain or maintain a false belief that could be both self‐enhancing or self‐diminishing. Study 1 (N = 152) captured self‐deception by adopting a modified numerical discrimination task that provided cheating opportunities, quantifying errors in predicting future performance (via item‐response theory model), and measuring the belief of how good they are at solving the task (i.e., self‐efficacy belief). By examining whether self‐efficacy belief is based upon actual ability (true belief) or prediction errors (false belief), Study 1 showed that self‐deception occurred in the effortless (easier access to answer cues) rather than effortful (harder access to answer cues) cheating opportunity conditions, suggesting high ambiguity in attributions facilitates self‐deception. Studies 2 and 3 probed the neural source of self‐deception, linking self‐deception with the metacognitive process. Both studies replicated behavioral results from Study 1. Study 2 (ERP study; N = 55) found that the amplitude of frontal slow wave significantly differed between participants with positive/self‐enhancing and negative/self‐diminishing self‐deceiving tendencies in incorrect predictions while remaining similar in correct predictions. Study 3 (functional magnetic resonance imaging study; N = 33) identified self‐deceiving associated activity in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex and showed that effortless cheating context increased cheating behaviors that further facilitated self‐deception. Our findings suggest self‐deception is a false belief associated with a distorted metacognitive mental process that requires ambiguity in attributions of behaviors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9875939/ /pubmed/36308407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mei, Dongmei
Ke, Zijun
Li, Zhihao
Zhang, Wenjian
Gao, Dingguo
Yin, Lijun
Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title_full Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title_fullStr Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title_full_unstemmed Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title_short Self‐deception: Distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
title_sort self‐deception: distorted metacognitive process in ambiguous contexts
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26116
work_keys_str_mv AT meidongmei selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts
AT kezijun selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts
AT lizhihao selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts
AT zhangwenjian selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts
AT gaodingguo selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts
AT yinlijun selfdeceptiondistortedmetacognitiveprocessinambiguouscontexts