Cargando…
How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods
INTRODUCTION: International organisations have called to increase young people’s involvement in healthcare and health policy development. We currently lack effective methods for facilitating meaningful engagement by young people in health-related decision-making. The purpose of this scoping review i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2 |
_version_ | 1784878161336467456 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Daniella Mhlaba, Mimi Molelekeng, Gontse Chauke, Thulani Andrew Simao, Sara Correia Jenner, Sarah Ware, Lisa J. Barker, Mary |
author_facet | Watson, Daniella Mhlaba, Mimi Molelekeng, Gontse Chauke, Thulani Andrew Simao, Sara Correia Jenner, Sarah Ware, Lisa J. Barker, Mary |
author_sort | Watson, Daniella |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: International organisations have called to increase young people’s involvement in healthcare and health policy development. We currently lack effective methods for facilitating meaningful engagement by young people in health-related decision-making. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify deliberative priority setting methods and explore the effectiveness of these in engaging young people in healthcare and health policy decision-making. METHODS: Seven databases were searched systematically, using MeSH and free text terms, for articles published in English before July 2021 that described the use of deliberative priority setting methods for health decision-making with young people. All titles, abstracts and full-text papers were screened by a team of six independent reviewers between them. Data extraction followed the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis, structured around four components for evaluating deliberative processes: 1) representation and inclusion of diverse participants, 2) the way the process is run including levels and timing of participant engagement, 3) the quality of the information provided to participants and 4) resulting outcomes and decisions. FINDINGS: The search yielded 9 reviews and 21 studies. The more engaging deliberative priority setting tools involved young people-led committees, mixed methods for identifying and prioritising issues and digital data collection and communication tools. Long-term and frequent contact with young people to build trust underpinned the success of some of the tools, as did offering incentives for taking part and skills development using creative methods. The review also suggests that successful priority setting processes with young people involve consideration of power dynamics, since young people’s decisions are likely to be made together with family members, health professionals and academics. DISCUSSION: Young people’s engagement in decision-making about their health is best achieved through investing time in building strong relationships and ensuring young people are appropriately rewarded for their time and contribution. If young people are to be instrumental in improving their health and architects of their own futures, decision-making processes need to respect young people’s autonomy and agency. Our review suggests that methods of power-sharing with young people do exist but that they have yet to be adopted by organisations and global institutions setting global health policy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9876416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98764162023-01-26 How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods Watson, Daniella Mhlaba, Mimi Molelekeng, Gontse Chauke, Thulani Andrew Simao, Sara Correia Jenner, Sarah Ware, Lisa J. Barker, Mary Int J Equity Health Review INTRODUCTION: International organisations have called to increase young people’s involvement in healthcare and health policy development. We currently lack effective methods for facilitating meaningful engagement by young people in health-related decision-making. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify deliberative priority setting methods and explore the effectiveness of these in engaging young people in healthcare and health policy decision-making. METHODS: Seven databases were searched systematically, using MeSH and free text terms, for articles published in English before July 2021 that described the use of deliberative priority setting methods for health decision-making with young people. All titles, abstracts and full-text papers were screened by a team of six independent reviewers between them. Data extraction followed the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis, structured around four components for evaluating deliberative processes: 1) representation and inclusion of diverse participants, 2) the way the process is run including levels and timing of participant engagement, 3) the quality of the information provided to participants and 4) resulting outcomes and decisions. FINDINGS: The search yielded 9 reviews and 21 studies. The more engaging deliberative priority setting tools involved young people-led committees, mixed methods for identifying and prioritising issues and digital data collection and communication tools. Long-term and frequent contact with young people to build trust underpinned the success of some of the tools, as did offering incentives for taking part and skills development using creative methods. The review also suggests that successful priority setting processes with young people involve consideration of power dynamics, since young people’s decisions are likely to be made together with family members, health professionals and academics. DISCUSSION: Young people’s engagement in decision-making about their health is best achieved through investing time in building strong relationships and ensuring young people are appropriately rewarded for their time and contribution. If young people are to be instrumental in improving their health and architects of their own futures, decision-making processes need to respect young people’s autonomy and agency. Our review suggests that methods of power-sharing with young people do exist but that they have yet to be adopted by organisations and global institutions setting global health policy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2. BioMed Central 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9876416/ /pubmed/36698119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Watson, Daniella Mhlaba, Mimi Molelekeng, Gontse Chauke, Thulani Andrew Simao, Sara Correia Jenner, Sarah Ware, Lisa J. Barker, Mary How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title | How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title_full | How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title_fullStr | How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title_full_unstemmed | How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title_short | How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
title_sort | how do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? a scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsondaniella howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT mhlabamimi howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT molelekenggontse howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT chaukethulaniandrew howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT simaosaracorreia howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT jennersarah howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT warelisaj howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods AT barkermary howdowebestengageyoungpeopleindecisionmakingabouttheirhealthascopingreviewofdeliberativeprioritysettingmethods |