Cargando…

Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: Optimal fluid management in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients remains contested. We aimed to examine the association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative complications. METHODS: We studied 168 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients operated in 2015 (n = 93) or 2017 (n = ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peltoniemi, Piia, Pere, Pertti, Mustonen, Harri, Seppänen, Hanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05453-3
_version_ 1784878258773295104
author Peltoniemi, Piia
Pere, Pertti
Mustonen, Harri
Seppänen, Hanna
author_facet Peltoniemi, Piia
Pere, Pertti
Mustonen, Harri
Seppänen, Hanna
author_sort Peltoniemi, Piia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal fluid management in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients remains contested. We aimed to examine the association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative complications. METHODS: We studied 168 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients operated in 2015 (n = 93) or 2017 (n = 75) at Helsinki University Hospital. In 2015, patients received intraoperative fluids following a goal-directed approach and, in 2017, according to anesthesiologist’s clinical practice (conventional fluid management). We analyzed the differences in perioperative fluid administration between the groups, specifically examining the occurrence of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III), pancreatic fistulas, cardiovascular complications, and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The goal-directed group received more intraoperative fluids than the conventional fluid management group (12.0 ml/kg/h vs. 8.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Urine output (770 ml vs. 575 ml, p = 0.004) and intraoperative fluid balance (9.4 ml/kg/h vs. 6.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001) were higher in the goal-directed group than in the conventional fluid management group. Severe surgical complications (19.4% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.009) as well as clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (1.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.011) occurred more frequently in patients receiving conventional fluid management. Moreover, the conventional fluid management group experienced longer hospital stays (9.0 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.02). Lower intraoperative fluid volume accompanying conventional fluid management was associated with a higher risk of severe postoperative complications compared with higher volume in the goal-directed group (odds ratio 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.04–6.42), p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: The goal-directed group experienced severe complications less frequently. Our findings indicate that optimizing the intraoperative fluid administration benefits patients, while adopting a too-restrictive approach represents an inferior choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9876870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98768702023-01-27 Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Peltoniemi, Piia Pere, Pertti Mustonen, Harri Seppänen, Hanna J Gastrointest Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Optimal fluid management in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients remains contested. We aimed to examine the association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative complications. METHODS: We studied 168 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients operated in 2015 (n = 93) or 2017 (n = 75) at Helsinki University Hospital. In 2015, patients received intraoperative fluids following a goal-directed approach and, in 2017, according to anesthesiologist’s clinical practice (conventional fluid management). We analyzed the differences in perioperative fluid administration between the groups, specifically examining the occurrence of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III), pancreatic fistulas, cardiovascular complications, and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The goal-directed group received more intraoperative fluids than the conventional fluid management group (12.0 ml/kg/h vs. 8.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Urine output (770 ml vs. 575 ml, p = 0.004) and intraoperative fluid balance (9.4 ml/kg/h vs. 6.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001) were higher in the goal-directed group than in the conventional fluid management group. Severe surgical complications (19.4% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.009) as well as clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (1.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.011) occurred more frequently in patients receiving conventional fluid management. Moreover, the conventional fluid management group experienced longer hospital stays (9.0 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.02). Lower intraoperative fluid volume accompanying conventional fluid management was associated with a higher risk of severe postoperative complications compared with higher volume in the goal-directed group (odds ratio 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.04–6.42), p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: The goal-directed group experienced severe complications less frequently. Our findings indicate that optimizing the intraoperative fluid administration benefits patients, while adopting a too-restrictive approach represents an inferior choice. Springer US 2022-09-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9876870/ /pubmed/36131201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05453-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Peltoniemi, Piia
Pere, Pertti
Mustonen, Harri
Seppänen, Hanna
Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_full Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_fullStr Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_short Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_sort optimal perioperative fluid therapy associates with fewer complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05453-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peltoniemipiia optimalperioperativefluidtherapyassociateswithfewercomplicationsafterpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT perepertti optimalperioperativefluidtherapyassociateswithfewercomplicationsafterpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT mustonenharri optimalperioperativefluidtherapyassociateswithfewercomplicationsafterpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT seppanenhanna optimalperioperativefluidtherapyassociateswithfewercomplicationsafterpancreaticoduodenectomy