Cargando…
Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the results of irradiation with protons versus irradiation with carbon ions in a raster scan technique in patients with skull base chordomas and to identify risk factors that may compromise treatment results. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (85 men, 62 women)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4 |
_version_ | 1784878259502055424 |
---|---|
author | Mattke, Matthias Ohlinger, Matteo Bougatf, Nina Harrabi, Semi Wolf, Robert Seidensaal, Katharina Welzel, Thomas Röder, Falk Gerum, Sabine Ellerbrock, Malte Jäkel, Oliver Haberer, Thomas Herfarth, Klaus Uhl, Matthias Debus, Jürgen |
author_facet | Mattke, Matthias Ohlinger, Matteo Bougatf, Nina Harrabi, Semi Wolf, Robert Seidensaal, Katharina Welzel, Thomas Röder, Falk Gerum, Sabine Ellerbrock, Malte Jäkel, Oliver Haberer, Thomas Herfarth, Klaus Uhl, Matthias Debus, Jürgen |
author_sort | Mattke, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the results of irradiation with protons versus irradiation with carbon ions in a raster scan technique in patients with skull base chordomas and to identify risk factors that may compromise treatment results. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (85 men, 62 women) were irradiated with carbon ions (111 patients) or protons (36 patients) with a median dose of 66 Gy (RBE (Relative biological effectiveness); carbon ions) in 4 weeks or 74 Gy (RBE; protons) in 7 weeks at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in Heidelberg, Germany. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months. All patients had gross residual disease at the beginning of RT. Compression of the brainstem was present in 38%, contact without compression in 18%, and no contact but less than 3 mm distance in 16%. Local control and overall survival were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier Method based on scheduled treatment (protons vs. carbon ions) and compared via the log rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 41 patients (27.9%) developed a local recurrence. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months (95% CI: 40.8–53.8; reverse Kaplan–Meier median follow-up time 56.3 months, 95% CI: 51.9–60.7). No significant differences between protons and carbon ions were observed regarding LC, OS, or overall toxicity. The 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year LC rates were 97%, 80%, and 61% (protons) and 96%, 80%, and 65% (carbon ions), respectively. The corresponding OS rates were 100%, 92%, and 92% (protons) and 99%, 91%, and 83% (carbon ions). No significant prognostic factors for LC or OS could be determined regarding the whole cohort; however, a significantly improved LC could be observed if the tumor was > 3 mm distant from the brainstem in patients presenting in a primary situation. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of proton and carbon ion treatment of skull base chordomas seem similar regarding tumor control, survival, and toxicity. Close proximity to the brainstem might be a negative prognostic factor, at least in patients presenting in a primary situation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9876873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98768732023-01-27 Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience Mattke, Matthias Ohlinger, Matteo Bougatf, Nina Harrabi, Semi Wolf, Robert Seidensaal, Katharina Welzel, Thomas Röder, Falk Gerum, Sabine Ellerbrock, Malte Jäkel, Oliver Haberer, Thomas Herfarth, Klaus Uhl, Matthias Debus, Jürgen Strahlenther Onkol Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the results of irradiation with protons versus irradiation with carbon ions in a raster scan technique in patients with skull base chordomas and to identify risk factors that may compromise treatment results. METHODS: A total of 147 patients (85 men, 62 women) were irradiated with carbon ions (111 patients) or protons (36 patients) with a median dose of 66 Gy (RBE (Relative biological effectiveness); carbon ions) in 4 weeks or 74 Gy (RBE; protons) in 7 weeks at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in Heidelberg, Germany. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months. All patients had gross residual disease at the beginning of RT. Compression of the brainstem was present in 38%, contact without compression in 18%, and no contact but less than 3 mm distance in 16%. Local control and overall survival were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier Method based on scheduled treatment (protons vs. carbon ions) and compared via the log rank test. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 41 patients (27.9%) developed a local recurrence. The median follow-up time was 49.3 months (95% CI: 40.8–53.8; reverse Kaplan–Meier median follow-up time 56.3 months, 95% CI: 51.9–60.7). No significant differences between protons and carbon ions were observed regarding LC, OS, or overall toxicity. The 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year LC rates were 97%, 80%, and 61% (protons) and 96%, 80%, and 65% (carbon ions), respectively. The corresponding OS rates were 100%, 92%, and 92% (protons) and 99%, 91%, and 83% (carbon ions). No significant prognostic factors for LC or OS could be determined regarding the whole cohort; however, a significantly improved LC could be observed if the tumor was > 3 mm distant from the brainstem in patients presenting in a primary situation. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of proton and carbon ion treatment of skull base chordomas seem similar regarding tumor control, survival, and toxicity. Close proximity to the brainstem might be a negative prognostic factor, at least in patients presenting in a primary situation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9876873/ /pubmed/36149438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mattke, Matthias Ohlinger, Matteo Bougatf, Nina Harrabi, Semi Wolf, Robert Seidensaal, Katharina Welzel, Thomas Röder, Falk Gerum, Sabine Ellerbrock, Malte Jäkel, Oliver Haberer, Thomas Herfarth, Klaus Uhl, Matthias Debus, Jürgen Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title | Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title_full | Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title_short | Proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center—a single-center experience |
title_sort | proton and carbon ion beam treatment with active raster scanning method in 147 patients with skull base chordoma at the heidelberg ion beam therapy center—a single-center experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-02002-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mattkematthias protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT ohlingermatteo protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT bougatfnina protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT harrabisemi protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT wolfrobert protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT seidensaalkatharina protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT welzelthomas protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT roderfalk protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT gerumsabine protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT ellerbrockmalte protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT jakeloliver protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT habererthomas protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT herfarthklaus protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT uhlmatthias protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience AT debusjurgen protonandcarbonionbeamtreatmentwithactiverasterscanningmethodin147patientswithskullbasechordomaattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenterasinglecenterexperience |