Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of formocresol (FC), ferric sulfate (FS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide (CH), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), biodentine, and laser for pulpotomy of molar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An upd...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1 |
_version_ | 1784878260260175872 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Jiehua Zhang, Na Cheng, Yuzhao |
author_facet | Guo, Jiehua Zhang, Na Cheng, Yuzhao |
author_sort | Guo, Jiehua |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of formocresol (FC), ferric sulfate (FS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide (CH), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), biodentine, and laser for pulpotomy of molar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An updated search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before October 30, 2022, after screening previous meta-analyses. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Clinical and radiographic success rates were assessed as outcomes. Random network meta-analysis was performed by using STATA software (version 14.0) with “network” command. RESULTS: A total of 43 RCTs were included. Network meta-analysis indicated that CH was inferior to other medicaments and techniques in all outcomes, and MTA and biodentine was better than FC, FS, and NaOCl in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates. Results of ranking probabilities suggested that MTA ranked first in all outcomes except for clinical success at both 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that MTA was associated with significant improvement in both clinical and radiographic success than other pulpotomy medicaments and techniques, with the highest probability of being the optimal option. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current network meta-analysis determined the comparative efficacy and safety of 7 common pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy, including FC, FS, NaOCl, CH, MTA, biodentine, and laser, and the pooled results revealed comparable efficacy in clinical and radiographic success rates at 6 and 12 months between FC, FS, and NaOCl in primary molars pulpotomies. However, MTA, biodentine and laser may have more advantages than other pulpotomy medicaments for clinical and radiographic success. Therefore, in clinical practice, practitioners should select MTA, biodentine, or laser as pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9876877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98768772023-01-27 Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis Guo, Jiehua Zhang, Na Cheng, Yuzhao Clin Oral Investig Review OBJECTIVES: We performed this network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of formocresol (FC), ferric sulfate (FS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium hydroxide (CH), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), biodentine, and laser for pulpotomy of molar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An updated search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before October 30, 2022, after screening previous meta-analyses. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Clinical and radiographic success rates were assessed as outcomes. Random network meta-analysis was performed by using STATA software (version 14.0) with “network” command. RESULTS: A total of 43 RCTs were included. Network meta-analysis indicated that CH was inferior to other medicaments and techniques in all outcomes, and MTA and biodentine was better than FC, FS, and NaOCl in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates. Results of ranking probabilities suggested that MTA ranked first in all outcomes except for clinical success at both 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that MTA was associated with significant improvement in both clinical and radiographic success than other pulpotomy medicaments and techniques, with the highest probability of being the optimal option. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current network meta-analysis determined the comparative efficacy and safety of 7 common pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy, including FC, FS, NaOCl, CH, MTA, biodentine, and laser, and the pooled results revealed comparable efficacy in clinical and radiographic success rates at 6 and 12 months between FC, FS, and NaOCl in primary molars pulpotomies. However, MTA, biodentine and laser may have more advantages than other pulpotomy medicaments for clinical and radiographic success. Therefore, in clinical practice, practitioners should select MTA, biodentine, or laser as pulpotomy medicaments in molar pulpotomy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9876877/ /pubmed/36580161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Guo, Jiehua Zhang, Na Cheng, Yuzhao Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of medicaments or techniques for pulpotomy of primary molars: a network meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04830-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojiehua comparativeefficacyofmedicamentsortechniquesforpulpotomyofprimarymolarsanetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangna comparativeefficacyofmedicamentsortechniquesforpulpotomyofprimarymolarsanetworkmetaanalysis AT chengyuzhao comparativeefficacyofmedicamentsortechniquesforpulpotomyofprimarymolarsanetworkmetaanalysis |