Cargando…

Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey

BACKGROUND: Professional certification of community health workers (CHWs) is a debated topic. Although intended to promote CHWs, certification may have unintended impacts given the grassroots nature of the workforce. As such, both intended effects and unintended adverse effects should be carefully e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Victoria M., Ursprung, W. W. Sanouri, Song, Glory, Hirsch, Gail, Mason, Theresa, Santarelli, Claire, Guimaraes, Erica, Marshall, Erica, Allen, Caitlin G., Lei, Pei-Pei, Brown, Diane, Behl-Chadha, Bittie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711392
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043668
_version_ 1784878382242070528
author Nielsen, Victoria M.
Ursprung, W. W. Sanouri
Song, Glory
Hirsch, Gail
Mason, Theresa
Santarelli, Claire
Guimaraes, Erica
Marshall, Erica
Allen, Caitlin G.
Lei, Pei-Pei
Brown, Diane
Behl-Chadha, Bittie
author_facet Nielsen, Victoria M.
Ursprung, W. W. Sanouri
Song, Glory
Hirsch, Gail
Mason, Theresa
Santarelli, Claire
Guimaraes, Erica
Marshall, Erica
Allen, Caitlin G.
Lei, Pei-Pei
Brown, Diane
Behl-Chadha, Bittie
author_sort Nielsen, Victoria M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Professional certification of community health workers (CHWs) is a debated topic. Although intended to promote CHWs, certification may have unintended impacts given the grassroots nature of the workforce. As such, both intended effects and unintended adverse effects should be carefully evaluated. However, there is a lack of published literature describing such effective evaluations with a robust methodology. In this methods paper, we describe a key component of evaluating CHW certification in Massachusetts-the Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey. METHODS: Design of the surveys was informed by a program theory framework that delineated both positive and negative potential impacts of Massachusetts CHW certification on CHWs and CHW employers. Using this framework, we developed measures of interest and preliminary CHW and CHW employer surveys. To validate and refine the surveys, we conducted cognitive interviews with CHWs and CHW employers. We then finalized survey tools with input from state and national stakeholders, CHWs, and CHW employers. Our sample consisted of three frames based on where CHWs are most likely to be employed in Massachusetts: acute care hospitals, community-based organizations, and ambulatory care health centers, primarily community health centers and federally qualified health centers. We then undertook extensive outreach efforts to determine whether each organization employed CHWs and to obtain CHW and CHW employer contact information. Our statistical analysis of the data utilized inverse probability score weighting accounting for organizational, site, and individual response. ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Wave one of the survey was administered in 2016 prior to launch of Massachusetts CHW certification and wave two in 2021. We report descriptive statistics of the three sample frames and response rates of each survey for each wave. Further, we describe select anticipated results related to certification, including outcomes of the program theory framework. CONCLUSIONS: The Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey is the culmination of 5 years of effort to evaluate the impact of CHW certification in Massachusetts. Our comprehensive description of our methodology addresses an important gap in CHW research literature. The rigorous design, administration, and analysis of our surveys ensure our findings are robust, valid, and replicable, which can be leveraged by others evaluating the CHW workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9877511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98775112023-01-27 Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey Nielsen, Victoria M. Ursprung, W. W. Sanouri Song, Glory Hirsch, Gail Mason, Theresa Santarelli, Claire Guimaraes, Erica Marshall, Erica Allen, Caitlin G. Lei, Pei-Pei Brown, Diane Behl-Chadha, Bittie Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Professional certification of community health workers (CHWs) is a debated topic. Although intended to promote CHWs, certification may have unintended impacts given the grassroots nature of the workforce. As such, both intended effects and unintended adverse effects should be carefully evaluated. However, there is a lack of published literature describing such effective evaluations with a robust methodology. In this methods paper, we describe a key component of evaluating CHW certification in Massachusetts-the Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey. METHODS: Design of the surveys was informed by a program theory framework that delineated both positive and negative potential impacts of Massachusetts CHW certification on CHWs and CHW employers. Using this framework, we developed measures of interest and preliminary CHW and CHW employer surveys. To validate and refine the surveys, we conducted cognitive interviews with CHWs and CHW employers. We then finalized survey tools with input from state and national stakeholders, CHWs, and CHW employers. Our sample consisted of three frames based on where CHWs are most likely to be employed in Massachusetts: acute care hospitals, community-based organizations, and ambulatory care health centers, primarily community health centers and federally qualified health centers. We then undertook extensive outreach efforts to determine whether each organization employed CHWs and to obtain CHW and CHW employer contact information. Our statistical analysis of the data utilized inverse probability score weighting accounting for organizational, site, and individual response. ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Wave one of the survey was administered in 2016 prior to launch of Massachusetts CHW certification and wave two in 2021. We report descriptive statistics of the three sample frames and response rates of each survey for each wave. Further, we describe select anticipated results related to certification, including outcomes of the program theory framework. CONCLUSIONS: The Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey is the culmination of 5 years of effort to evaluate the impact of CHW certification in Massachusetts. Our comprehensive description of our methodology addresses an important gap in CHW research literature. The rigorous design, administration, and analysis of our surveys ensure our findings are robust, valid, and replicable, which can be leveraged by others evaluating the CHW workforce. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9877511/ /pubmed/36711392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043668 Text en Copyright © 2023 Nielsen, Ursprung, Song, Hirsch, Mason, Santarelli, Guimaraes, Marshall, Allen, Lei, Brown and Behl-Chadha. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Nielsen, Victoria M.
Ursprung, W. W. Sanouri
Song, Glory
Hirsch, Gail
Mason, Theresa
Santarelli, Claire
Guimaraes, Erica
Marshall, Erica
Allen, Caitlin G.
Lei, Pei-Pei
Brown, Diane
Behl-Chadha, Bittie
Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title_full Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title_short Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
title_sort evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in massachusetts: design, methods, and anticipated results of the massachusetts community health worker workforce survey
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36711392
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043668
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenvictoriam evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT ursprungwwsanouri evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT songglory evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT hirschgail evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT masontheresa evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT santarelliclaire evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT guimaraeserica evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT marshallerica evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT allencaitling evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT leipeipei evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT browndiane evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey
AT behlchadhabittie evaluatingtheimpactofcommunityhealthworkercertificationinmassachusettsdesignmethodsandanticipatedresultsofthemassachusettscommunityhealthworkerworkforcesurvey