Cargando…

Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients

AIMS: Nadroparin is administered to COVID‐19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients as thromboprophylaxis. Despite existing population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for nadroparin in literature, the population PK of nadroparin in COVID‐19 ICU patients is unknown. Moreover, optimal dosing regimens achievin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romano, Lorenzo G. R., Hunfeld, Nicole G. M., Kruip, Marieke J. H. A., Endeman, Henrik, Preijers, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15634
_version_ 1784878448330670080
author Romano, Lorenzo G. R.
Hunfeld, Nicole G. M.
Kruip, Marieke J. H. A.
Endeman, Henrik
Preijers, Tim
author_facet Romano, Lorenzo G. R.
Hunfeld, Nicole G. M.
Kruip, Marieke J. H. A.
Endeman, Henrik
Preijers, Tim
author_sort Romano, Lorenzo G. R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Nadroparin is administered to COVID‐19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients as thromboprophylaxis. Despite existing population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for nadroparin in literature, the population PK of nadroparin in COVID‐19 ICU patients is unknown. Moreover, optimal dosing regimens achieving anti‐Xa target levels (0.3–0.7 IU/mL) are unknown. Therefore, a population PK analysis was conducted to investigate different dosing regimens of nadroparin in COVID‐19 ICU patients. METHODS: Anti‐Xa levels (n = 280) from COVID‐19 ICU patients (n = 65) receiving twice daily (BID) 5700 IU of subcutaneous nadroparin were collected to perform a population PK analysis with NONMEM v7.4.1. Using Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000), predefined dosing regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: A 1‐compartment model with an absorption compartment adequately described the measured anti‐Xa levels with interindividual variability estimated for clearance (CL). Inflammation parameters C‐reactive protein, D‐dimer and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation allowed to explain the interindividual variability of CL. Moreover, CL was decreased in patients receiving corticosteroids (22.5%) and vasopressors (25.1%). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that 5700 IU BID was the most optimal dosing regimen of the simulated regimens for achieving prespecified steady‐state t = 4 h anti‐Xa levels with 56.7% on target (0.3–0.7 IU/mL). CONCLUSION: In our study, clearance of nadroparin is associated with an increase in inflammation parameters, use of corticosteroids, vasopression and renal clearance in critically ill patients. Furthermore, of the simulated regimens, targeted anti‐Xa levels were most adequately achieved with a dosing regimen of 5700 IU BID. Future studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of found covariate relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9878197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98781972023-01-26 Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients Romano, Lorenzo G. R. Hunfeld, Nicole G. M. Kruip, Marieke J. H. A. Endeman, Henrik Preijers, Tim Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Nadroparin is administered to COVID‐19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients as thromboprophylaxis. Despite existing population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for nadroparin in literature, the population PK of nadroparin in COVID‐19 ICU patients is unknown. Moreover, optimal dosing regimens achieving anti‐Xa target levels (0.3–0.7 IU/mL) are unknown. Therefore, a population PK analysis was conducted to investigate different dosing regimens of nadroparin in COVID‐19 ICU patients. METHODS: Anti‐Xa levels (n = 280) from COVID‐19 ICU patients (n = 65) receiving twice daily (BID) 5700 IU of subcutaneous nadroparin were collected to perform a population PK analysis with NONMEM v7.4.1. Using Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000), predefined dosing regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: A 1‐compartment model with an absorption compartment adequately described the measured anti‐Xa levels with interindividual variability estimated for clearance (CL). Inflammation parameters C‐reactive protein, D‐dimer and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation allowed to explain the interindividual variability of CL. Moreover, CL was decreased in patients receiving corticosteroids (22.5%) and vasopressors (25.1%). Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that 5700 IU BID was the most optimal dosing regimen of the simulated regimens for achieving prespecified steady‐state t = 4 h anti‐Xa levels with 56.7% on target (0.3–0.7 IU/mL). CONCLUSION: In our study, clearance of nadroparin is associated with an increase in inflammation parameters, use of corticosteroids, vasopression and renal clearance in critically ill patients. Furthermore, of the simulated regimens, targeted anti‐Xa levels were most adequately achieved with a dosing regimen of 5700 IU BID. Future studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of found covariate relationships. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9878197/ /pubmed/36495312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15634 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Romano, Lorenzo G. R.
Hunfeld, Nicole G. M.
Kruip, Marieke J. H. A.
Endeman, Henrik
Preijers, Tim
Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title_full Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title_fullStr Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title_full_unstemmed Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title_short Population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in COVID‐19 intensive care unit patients
title_sort population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis in covid‐19 intensive care unit patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15634
work_keys_str_mv AT romanolorenzogr populationpharmacokineticsofnadroparinforthromboprophylaxisincovid19intensivecareunitpatients
AT hunfeldnicolegm populationpharmacokineticsofnadroparinforthromboprophylaxisincovid19intensivecareunitpatients
AT kruipmariekejha populationpharmacokineticsofnadroparinforthromboprophylaxisincovid19intensivecareunitpatients
AT endemanhenrik populationpharmacokineticsofnadroparinforthromboprophylaxisincovid19intensivecareunitpatients
AT preijerstim populationpharmacokineticsofnadroparinforthromboprophylaxisincovid19intensivecareunitpatients