Cargando…

Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots

INTRODUCTION: Social robot adoption by older adults and people living with dementia is limited by several barriers, including a lack of emotional alignment with social robots and perceptions of stigma around social robot use. The goal of this work was to address these barriers by engaging end-users...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dosso, Jill A., Kailley, Jaya N., Guerra, Gabriella K., Robillard, Julie M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1051750
_version_ 1784878482551996416
author Dosso, Jill A.
Kailley, Jaya N.
Guerra, Gabriella K.
Robillard, Julie M.
author_facet Dosso, Jill A.
Kailley, Jaya N.
Guerra, Gabriella K.
Robillard, Julie M.
author_sort Dosso, Jill A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Social robot adoption by older adults and people living with dementia is limited by several barriers, including a lack of emotional alignment with social robots and perceptions of stigma around social robot use. The goal of this work was to address these barriers by engaging end-users in discussions on factors that could affect emotional connection to a social robot and considerations around using a social robot in public. METHODS: We conducted seven 90-min online workshops with older adults with (n = 2) and without dementia (n = 25) and care partners (n = 17). Older adults with and without dementia were in their 50s – 80s, and care partners were in their 30s – 70s. Seven older adults, seven care partners, and one older adult with dementia indicated that they had used a robot before. Online workshops had 4-8 participants each, and began with video demonstrations of pet-like robot MiRo and tabletop robot T-Top, as well as a live demonstration of MiRo. Participants completed the Multi-Dimensional Robot Attitude Scale before the workshops and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale and two Zoom polls during the workshops. The audio and chat responses from the workshops were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was performed on the transcripts. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed three broad themes and 10 subthemes. In their discussions on features and applications, participants highlighted preferred forms of communication with a robot and ways in which a robot could support connection between people. For example, robots could improve the quality of communication between care partners and the person for whom they care. While many agreed that a social robot should match their level of emotion and interactivity, participants had different preferences for social robot emotional range and display features. Finally, participants discussed considerations around showing a robot to other people; several participants suggested that a robot could help raise awareness of ageing and dementia while others shared concerns about stigma and attracting negative attention from an audience. DISCUSSION: Incorporating these findings into the design and implementation of social robots will result in devices that are better-suited to the needs of older adults, people living with dementia, and care partners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9878396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98783962023-01-27 Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots Dosso, Jill A. Kailley, Jaya N. Guerra, Gabriella K. Robillard, Julie M. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry INTRODUCTION: Social robot adoption by older adults and people living with dementia is limited by several barriers, including a lack of emotional alignment with social robots and perceptions of stigma around social robot use. The goal of this work was to address these barriers by engaging end-users in discussions on factors that could affect emotional connection to a social robot and considerations around using a social robot in public. METHODS: We conducted seven 90-min online workshops with older adults with (n = 2) and without dementia (n = 25) and care partners (n = 17). Older adults with and without dementia were in their 50s – 80s, and care partners were in their 30s – 70s. Seven older adults, seven care partners, and one older adult with dementia indicated that they had used a robot before. Online workshops had 4-8 participants each, and began with video demonstrations of pet-like robot MiRo and tabletop robot T-Top, as well as a live demonstration of MiRo. Participants completed the Multi-Dimensional Robot Attitude Scale before the workshops and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale and two Zoom polls during the workshops. The audio and chat responses from the workshops were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was performed on the transcripts. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed three broad themes and 10 subthemes. In their discussions on features and applications, participants highlighted preferred forms of communication with a robot and ways in which a robot could support connection between people. For example, robots could improve the quality of communication between care partners and the person for whom they care. While many agreed that a social robot should match their level of emotion and interactivity, participants had different preferences for social robot emotional range and display features. Finally, participants discussed considerations around showing a robot to other people; several participants suggested that a robot could help raise awareness of ageing and dementia while others shared concerns about stigma and attracting negative attention from an audience. DISCUSSION: Incorporating these findings into the design and implementation of social robots will result in devices that are better-suited to the needs of older adults, people living with dementia, and care partners. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9878396/ /pubmed/36713914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1051750 Text en Copyright © 2023 Dosso, Kailley, Guerra and Robillard. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Dosso, Jill A.
Kailley, Jaya N.
Guerra, Gabriella K.
Robillard, Julie M.
Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title_full Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title_fullStr Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title_full_unstemmed Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title_short Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
title_sort older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1051750
work_keys_str_mv AT dossojilla olderadultperspectivesonemotionandstigmainsocialrobots
AT kailleyjayan olderadultperspectivesonemotionandstigmainsocialrobots
AT guerragabriellak olderadultperspectivesonemotionandstigmainsocialrobots
AT robillardjuliem olderadultperspectivesonemotionandstigmainsocialrobots