Cargando…

A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Asmri, Mansour, Haque, M. Sayeed, Parle, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6
_version_ 1784878584410669056
author Al Asmri, Mansour
Haque, M. Sayeed
Parle, Jim
author_facet Al Asmri, Mansour
Haque, M. Sayeed
Parle, Jim
author_sort Al Asmri, Mansour
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consensus among experts on: (1) the MERSQI scoring system and the relative importance of each domain (2) modifications of the MERSQI. METHOD: A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus among experts in the field of medical education. The initial item pool contained all items from MERSQI and items added in our previous published work. Each Delphi round comprised a questionnaire and, after the first iteration, an analysis and feedback report. We modified the quality instruments’ domains, items and sub-items and re-scored items/domains based on the Delphi panel feedback. RESULTS: A total of 12 experts agreed to participate and were sent the first and second-round questionnaires. First round: 12 returned of which 11 contained analysable responses; second-round: 10 returned analysable responses. We started with seven domains with an initial item pool of 12 items and 38 sub-items. No change in the number of domains or items resulted from the Delphi process; however, the number of sub-items increased from 38 to 43 across the two Delphi rounds. In Delphi-2: eight respondents gave ‘study design’ the highest weighting while ‘setting’ was given the lowest weighting by all respondents. There was no change in the domains’ average weighting score and ranks between rounds. CONCLUSIONS: The final criteria list and the new domain weighting score of the Modified MERSQI (MMERSQI) was satisfactory to all respondents. We suggest that the MMERSQI, in building on the success of the MERSQI, may help further establish a reference standard of quality measures for many medical education studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9878889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98788892023-01-27 A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus Al Asmri, Mansour Haque, M. Sayeed Parle, Jim BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consensus among experts on: (1) the MERSQI scoring system and the relative importance of each domain (2) modifications of the MERSQI. METHOD: A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus among experts in the field of medical education. The initial item pool contained all items from MERSQI and items added in our previous published work. Each Delphi round comprised a questionnaire and, after the first iteration, an analysis and feedback report. We modified the quality instruments’ domains, items and sub-items and re-scored items/domains based on the Delphi panel feedback. RESULTS: A total of 12 experts agreed to participate and were sent the first and second-round questionnaires. First round: 12 returned of which 11 contained analysable responses; second-round: 10 returned analysable responses. We started with seven domains with an initial item pool of 12 items and 38 sub-items. No change in the number of domains or items resulted from the Delphi process; however, the number of sub-items increased from 38 to 43 across the two Delphi rounds. In Delphi-2: eight respondents gave ‘study design’ the highest weighting while ‘setting’ was given the lowest weighting by all respondents. There was no change in the domains’ average weighting score and ranks between rounds. CONCLUSIONS: The final criteria list and the new domain weighting score of the Modified MERSQI (MMERSQI) was satisfactory to all respondents. We suggest that the MMERSQI, in building on the success of the MERSQI, may help further establish a reference standard of quality measures for many medical education studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6. BioMed Central 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9878889/ /pubmed/36698117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Al Asmri, Mansour
Haque, M. Sayeed
Parle, Jim
A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title_full A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title_fullStr A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title_full_unstemmed A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title_short A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
title_sort modified medical education research study quality instrument (mmersqi) developed by delphi consensus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alasmrimansour amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus
AT haquemsayeed amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus
AT parlejim amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus
AT alasmrimansour modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus
AT haquemsayeed modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus
AT parlejim modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus