Cargando…
A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus
BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consens...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6 |
_version_ | 1784878584410669056 |
---|---|
author | Al Asmri, Mansour Haque, M. Sayeed Parle, Jim |
author_facet | Al Asmri, Mansour Haque, M. Sayeed Parle, Jim |
author_sort | Al Asmri, Mansour |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consensus among experts on: (1) the MERSQI scoring system and the relative importance of each domain (2) modifications of the MERSQI. METHOD: A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus among experts in the field of medical education. The initial item pool contained all items from MERSQI and items added in our previous published work. Each Delphi round comprised a questionnaire and, after the first iteration, an analysis and feedback report. We modified the quality instruments’ domains, items and sub-items and re-scored items/domains based on the Delphi panel feedback. RESULTS: A total of 12 experts agreed to participate and were sent the first and second-round questionnaires. First round: 12 returned of which 11 contained analysable responses; second-round: 10 returned analysable responses. We started with seven domains with an initial item pool of 12 items and 38 sub-items. No change in the number of domains or items resulted from the Delphi process; however, the number of sub-items increased from 38 to 43 across the two Delphi rounds. In Delphi-2: eight respondents gave ‘study design’ the highest weighting while ‘setting’ was given the lowest weighting by all respondents. There was no change in the domains’ average weighting score and ranks between rounds. CONCLUSIONS: The final criteria list and the new domain weighting score of the Modified MERSQI (MMERSQI) was satisfactory to all respondents. We suggest that the MMERSQI, in building on the success of the MERSQI, may help further establish a reference standard of quality measures for many medical education studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9878889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98788892023-01-27 A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus Al Asmri, Mansour Haque, M. Sayeed Parle, Jim BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) is widely used to appraise the methodological quality of medical education studies. However, the MERSQI lacks some criteria which could facilitate better quality assessment. The objective of this study is to achieve consensus among experts on: (1) the MERSQI scoring system and the relative importance of each domain (2) modifications of the MERSQI. METHOD: A modified Delphi technique was used to achieve consensus among experts in the field of medical education. The initial item pool contained all items from MERSQI and items added in our previous published work. Each Delphi round comprised a questionnaire and, after the first iteration, an analysis and feedback report. We modified the quality instruments’ domains, items and sub-items and re-scored items/domains based on the Delphi panel feedback. RESULTS: A total of 12 experts agreed to participate and were sent the first and second-round questionnaires. First round: 12 returned of which 11 contained analysable responses; second-round: 10 returned analysable responses. We started with seven domains with an initial item pool of 12 items and 38 sub-items. No change in the number of domains or items resulted from the Delphi process; however, the number of sub-items increased from 38 to 43 across the two Delphi rounds. In Delphi-2: eight respondents gave ‘study design’ the highest weighting while ‘setting’ was given the lowest weighting by all respondents. There was no change in the domains’ average weighting score and ranks between rounds. CONCLUSIONS: The final criteria list and the new domain weighting score of the Modified MERSQI (MMERSQI) was satisfactory to all respondents. We suggest that the MMERSQI, in building on the success of the MERSQI, may help further establish a reference standard of quality measures for many medical education studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6. BioMed Central 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9878889/ /pubmed/36698117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Al Asmri, Mansour Haque, M. Sayeed Parle, Jim A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title | A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title_full | A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title_fullStr | A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title_short | A Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI) developed by Delphi consensus |
title_sort | modified medical education research study quality instrument (mmersqi) developed by delphi consensus |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04033-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alasmrimansour amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus AT haquemsayeed amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus AT parlejim amodifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus AT alasmrimansour modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus AT haquemsayeed modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus AT parlejim modifiedmedicaleducationresearchstudyqualityinstrumentmmersqidevelopedbydelphiconsensus |