Cargando…
Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model
BACKGROUND: The recently developed endoscopic full-thickness resection technique requires reliable closure. The main closure methods are the purse-string suture (PSS) technique and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) technique; however, basic data on the closure strength of each technique are lacking. This s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01920-z |
_version_ | 1784878591521062912 |
---|---|
author | Matsui, Takanori Kobara, Hideki Nishiyama, Noriko Nakatani, Kaho Shi, Tingting Tada, Naoya Kozuka, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Nobuya Chiyo, Taiga Yachida, Tatsuo Kondo, Akihiro Kishino, Takayoshi Okano, Keiichi Fujihara, Shintaro Uchita, Kunihisa Hirasawa, Kingo Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_facet | Matsui, Takanori Kobara, Hideki Nishiyama, Noriko Nakatani, Kaho Shi, Tingting Tada, Naoya Kozuka, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Nobuya Chiyo, Taiga Yachida, Tatsuo Kondo, Akihiro Kishino, Takayoshi Okano, Keiichi Fujihara, Shintaro Uchita, Kunihisa Hirasawa, Kingo Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_sort | Matsui, Takanori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The recently developed endoscopic full-thickness resection technique requires reliable closure. The main closure methods are the purse-string suture (PSS) technique and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) technique; however, basic data on the closure strength of each technique are lacking. This study was performed to compare the closure strengths of these two methods in an ex vivo porcine model. METHODS: In the traction test, a virtual 5-cm full-thickness closure line was closed by the following six methods three times each: conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The primary endpoint was the tension at the starting point of dehiscence, measured in Newtons (N) by an automatic traction machine. In the leak test, a 15-mm gastric full-thickness defect was closed by PSS or OTSC six times each, and the closed stomach was then pressurized in a water container. The primary endpoint was the leak pressure when air bubbles appeared. The secondary endpoints were the procedure time and presence of complete inverted closure. RESULTS: The mean tension was 2.16, 3.68, 5.15, 18.30, 19.30, and 62.40 N for conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture, respectively. Complete inverted closure was observed for seromuscular PSS, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The mean leak pressure was 13.7 and 24.8 mmHg in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean procedure time was 541 and 169 s in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). Complete inverted closure was observed in OTSC alone. CONCLUSION: The OTSC, which allows complete inverted closure, showed greater closure strength than PSS. Considering the size limitation suitable for single OTSC, a therapeutic strategy for closing the larger size is further warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9878917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98789172023-01-27 Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model Matsui, Takanori Kobara, Hideki Nishiyama, Noriko Nakatani, Kaho Shi, Tingting Tada, Naoya Kozuka, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Nobuya Chiyo, Taiga Yachida, Tatsuo Kondo, Akihiro Kishino, Takayoshi Okano, Keiichi Fujihara, Shintaro Uchita, Kunihisa Hirasawa, Kingo Masaki, Tsutomu BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The recently developed endoscopic full-thickness resection technique requires reliable closure. The main closure methods are the purse-string suture (PSS) technique and over-the-scope clip (OTSC) technique; however, basic data on the closure strength of each technique are lacking. This study was performed to compare the closure strengths of these two methods in an ex vivo porcine model. METHODS: In the traction test, a virtual 5-cm full-thickness closure line was closed by the following six methods three times each: conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The primary endpoint was the tension at the starting point of dehiscence, measured in Newtons (N) by an automatic traction machine. In the leak test, a 15-mm gastric full-thickness defect was closed by PSS or OTSC six times each, and the closed stomach was then pressurized in a water container. The primary endpoint was the leak pressure when air bubbles appeared. The secondary endpoints were the procedure time and presence of complete inverted closure. RESULTS: The mean tension was 2.16, 3.68, 5.15, 18.30, 19.30, and 62.40 N for conventional hemoclips, mucosal PSS, seromuscular PSS, mucosal OTSC, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture, respectively. Complete inverted closure was observed for seromuscular PSS, seromuscular OTSC, and surgical suture. The mean leak pressure was 13.7 and 24.8 mmHg in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean procedure time was 541 and 169 s in the PSS and OTSC group, respectively (P < 0.01). Complete inverted closure was observed in OTSC alone. CONCLUSION: The OTSC, which allows complete inverted closure, showed greater closure strength than PSS. Considering the size limitation suitable for single OTSC, a therapeutic strategy for closing the larger size is further warranted. BioMed Central 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9878917/ /pubmed/36703127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01920-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matsui, Takanori Kobara, Hideki Nishiyama, Noriko Nakatani, Kaho Shi, Tingting Tada, Naoya Kozuka, Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Nobuya Chiyo, Taiga Yachida, Tatsuo Kondo, Akihiro Kishino, Takayoshi Okano, Keiichi Fujihara, Shintaro Uchita, Kunihisa Hirasawa, Kingo Masaki, Tsutomu Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title | Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title_full | Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title_short | Comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
title_sort | comparison of purse-string suture versus over-the-scope clip for gastric endoscopic full-thickness closure: traction and leak pressure testing in ex vivo porcine model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-01920-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsuitakanori comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT kobarahideki comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT nishiyamanoriko comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT nakatanikaho comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT shitingting comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT tadanaoya comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT kozukakazuhiro comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT kobayashinobuya comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT chiyotaiga comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT yachidatatsuo comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT kondoakihiro comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT kishinotakayoshi comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT okanokeiichi comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT fujiharashintaro comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT uchitakunihisa comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT hirasawakingo comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel AT masakitsutomu comparisonofpursestringsutureversusoverthescopeclipforgastricendoscopicfullthicknessclosuretractionandleakpressuretestinginexvivoporcinemodel |