Cargando…

Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunay, Ayse, Celenk, Sema, Adiguzel, Ozkan, Cangul, Suzan, Ozcan, Nida, Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683310
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065
_version_ 1784878592049545216
author Gunay, Ayse
Celenk, Sema
Adiguzel, Ozkan
Cangul, Suzan
Ozcan, Nida
Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu
author_facet Gunay, Ayse
Celenk, Sema
Adiguzel, Ozkan
Cangul, Suzan
Ozcan, Nida
Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu
author_sort Gunay, Ayse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-added GIC; and Ketac™ Molar Easymix. Using the agar diffusion test for antibacterial activity, 30 samples from each group were analyzed for Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces naeslundii. The areas around the samples where no bacterial growth occurred were digitally measured and recorded. For cytotoxicity analysis, the WST-1 test was performed on 10 samples from each group using the L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The fluoride release property was evaluated using an ion-selective electrode method on 10 samples from each group. RESULTS: The group that used Ketac™ Molar Easymix showed the lowest antibacterial activity against S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. naeslundii. In all 3 days of cytotoxicity testing, the group that used Riva Silver was found to be the least toxic material, while the group that used ChemFil Rock did not have viable cells after the 1(st) day. In all 4 materials, fluoride release values gradually increased since the first day, with Ketac™ Molar Easymix having the highest fluoride release. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the GICs tested, Ketac™ Molar Easymix demonstrated the least antibacterial activity despite having the highest fluoride release, while Riva Silver was found to be the least cytotoxic material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9878919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98789192023-02-03 Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry Gunay, Ayse Celenk, Sema Adiguzel, Ozkan Cangul, Suzan Ozcan, Nida Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu Med Sci Monit Lab/In Vitro Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-added GIC; and Ketac™ Molar Easymix. Using the agar diffusion test for antibacterial activity, 30 samples from each group were analyzed for Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces naeslundii. The areas around the samples where no bacterial growth occurred were digitally measured and recorded. For cytotoxicity analysis, the WST-1 test was performed on 10 samples from each group using the L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The fluoride release property was evaluated using an ion-selective electrode method on 10 samples from each group. RESULTS: The group that used Ketac™ Molar Easymix showed the lowest antibacterial activity against S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. naeslundii. In all 3 days of cytotoxicity testing, the group that used Riva Silver was found to be the least toxic material, while the group that used ChemFil Rock did not have viable cells after the 1(st) day. In all 4 materials, fluoride release values gradually increased since the first day, with Ketac™ Molar Easymix having the highest fluoride release. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the GICs tested, Ketac™ Molar Easymix demonstrated the least antibacterial activity despite having the highest fluoride release, while Riva Silver was found to be the least cytotoxic material. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9878919/ /pubmed/36683310 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Lab/In Vitro Research
Gunay, Ayse
Celenk, Sema
Adiguzel, Ozkan
Cangul, Suzan
Ozcan, Nida
Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu
Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title_full Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title_fullStr Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title_short Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
title_sort comparison of antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of glass ionomer restorative dental cements in dentistry
topic Lab/In Vitro Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683310
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065
work_keys_str_mv AT gunayayse comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry
AT celenksema comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry
AT adiguzelozkan comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry
AT cangulsuzan comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry
AT ozcannida comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry
AT cakmakogluezgieroglu comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry