Cargando…
Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683310 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065 |
_version_ | 1784878592049545216 |
---|---|
author | Gunay, Ayse Celenk, Sema Adiguzel, Ozkan Cangul, Suzan Ozcan, Nida Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu |
author_facet | Gunay, Ayse Celenk, Sema Adiguzel, Ozkan Cangul, Suzan Ozcan, Nida Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu |
author_sort | Gunay, Ayse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-added GIC; and Ketac™ Molar Easymix. Using the agar diffusion test for antibacterial activity, 30 samples from each group were analyzed for Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces naeslundii. The areas around the samples where no bacterial growth occurred were digitally measured and recorded. For cytotoxicity analysis, the WST-1 test was performed on 10 samples from each group using the L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The fluoride release property was evaluated using an ion-selective electrode method on 10 samples from each group. RESULTS: The group that used Ketac™ Molar Easymix showed the lowest antibacterial activity against S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. naeslundii. In all 3 days of cytotoxicity testing, the group that used Riva Silver was found to be the least toxic material, while the group that used ChemFil Rock did not have viable cells after the 1(st) day. In all 4 materials, fluoride release values gradually increased since the first day, with Ketac™ Molar Easymix having the highest fluoride release. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the GICs tested, Ketac™ Molar Easymix demonstrated the least antibacterial activity despite having the highest fluoride release, while Riva Silver was found to be the least cytotoxic material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9878919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98789192023-02-03 Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry Gunay, Ayse Celenk, Sema Adiguzel, Ozkan Cangul, Suzan Ozcan, Nida Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu Med Sci Monit Lab/In Vitro Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of 4 different glass ionomer cements (GIC). MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 200 samples were prepared: Riva Silver, a silver-reinforced GIC; Equia Forte HT, a glass hybrid GIC; ChemFil Rock, a zinc-added GIC; and Ketac™ Molar Easymix. Using the agar diffusion test for antibacterial activity, 30 samples from each group were analyzed for Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces naeslundii. The areas around the samples where no bacterial growth occurred were digitally measured and recorded. For cytotoxicity analysis, the WST-1 test was performed on 10 samples from each group using the L929 mouse fibroblast cell line. The fluoride release property was evaluated using an ion-selective electrode method on 10 samples from each group. RESULTS: The group that used Ketac™ Molar Easymix showed the lowest antibacterial activity against S. mutans, L. acidophilus, and A. naeslundii. In all 3 days of cytotoxicity testing, the group that used Riva Silver was found to be the least toxic material, while the group that used ChemFil Rock did not have viable cells after the 1(st) day. In all 4 materials, fluoride release values gradually increased since the first day, with Ketac™ Molar Easymix having the highest fluoride release. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the GICs tested, Ketac™ Molar Easymix demonstrated the least antibacterial activity despite having the highest fluoride release, while Riva Silver was found to be the least cytotoxic material. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9878919/ /pubmed/36683310 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Lab/In Vitro Research Gunay, Ayse Celenk, Sema Adiguzel, Ozkan Cangul, Suzan Ozcan, Nida Cakmakoglu, Ezgi Eroglu Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title_full | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title_short | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Cements in Dentistry |
title_sort | comparison of antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and fluoride release of glass ionomer restorative dental cements in dentistry |
topic | Lab/In Vitro Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36683310 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunayayse comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry AT celenksema comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry AT adiguzelozkan comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry AT cangulsuzan comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry AT ozcannida comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry AT cakmakogluezgieroglu comparisonofantibacterialactivitycytotoxicityandfluoridereleaseofglassionomerrestorativedentalcementsindentistry |