Cargando…

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease affecting a large number of people, with the optimal surgical strategy remaining controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and postoperative complications of primarily performed surgical pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Huajian, Xu, Chen, Wang, Ruizhe, Wu, Xiaodong, Wu, Huiqiao, Sun, Baifeng, Wang, Xinwei, Chen, Huajiang, Shen, Xiaolong, Yuan, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1065103
_version_ 1784878609190617088
author Zhong, Huajian
Xu, Chen
Wang, Ruizhe
Wu, Xiaodong
Wu, Huiqiao
Sun, Baifeng
Wang, Xinwei
Chen, Huajiang
Shen, Xiaolong
Yuan, Wen
author_facet Zhong, Huajian
Xu, Chen
Wang, Ruizhe
Wu, Xiaodong
Wu, Huiqiao
Sun, Baifeng
Wang, Xinwei
Chen, Huajiang
Shen, Xiaolong
Yuan, Wen
author_sort Zhong, Huajian
collection PubMed
description Four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease affecting a large number of people, with the optimal surgical strategy remaining controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and postoperative complications of primarily performed surgical procedures such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), open-door laminoplasty (LAMP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF) in treating four-level CSM. A total of 116 patients who received ACDF (38 cases), LAMP (45 cases), and LF (33 cases) were followed up for a minimum of 24 months were enrolled in this study and retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Changes in the curvature of the cervical spine were determined using the cervical curvature index (CCI) and the C2–C7 Cobb angle. Cervical mobility was evaluated using the C2–C7 range of motion (ROM) and active cervical ROM (aROM). Complications were recorded and compared among the three groups. All patients achieved significant improvement in JOA, NDI, and VAS scores at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), whereas no remarkable difference was found among the groups (P > 0.05). In addition, both C2–7 ROM and aROM were significantly reduced in the three groups and LAMP showed the least reduction relatively. As for complications, LAMP showed the lowest overall incidence of postoperative complications, and patients in the ACDF group were more susceptible to dysphagia, pseudoarthrosis than LAMP and LF. Considering improvements in clinical symptoms and neurological function, no remarkable difference was found among the groups. Nevertheless, LAMP had advantages over the other two surgical procedures in terms of preserving cervical mobility and reducing postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98790032023-01-27 Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Zhong, Huajian Xu, Chen Wang, Ruizhe Wu, Xiaodong Wu, Huiqiao Sun, Baifeng Wang, Xinwei Chen, Huajiang Shen, Xiaolong Yuan, Wen Front Surg Surgery Four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease affecting a large number of people, with the optimal surgical strategy remaining controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and postoperative complications of primarily performed surgical procedures such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), open-door laminoplasty (LAMP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF) in treating four-level CSM. A total of 116 patients who received ACDF (38 cases), LAMP (45 cases), and LF (33 cases) were followed up for a minimum of 24 months were enrolled in this study and retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Changes in the curvature of the cervical spine were determined using the cervical curvature index (CCI) and the C2–C7 Cobb angle. Cervical mobility was evaluated using the C2–C7 range of motion (ROM) and active cervical ROM (aROM). Complications were recorded and compared among the three groups. All patients achieved significant improvement in JOA, NDI, and VAS scores at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), whereas no remarkable difference was found among the groups (P > 0.05). In addition, both C2–7 ROM and aROM were significantly reduced in the three groups and LAMP showed the least reduction relatively. As for complications, LAMP showed the lowest overall incidence of postoperative complications, and patients in the ACDF group were more susceptible to dysphagia, pseudoarthrosis than LAMP and LF. Considering improvements in clinical symptoms and neurological function, no remarkable difference was found among the groups. Nevertheless, LAMP had advantages over the other two surgical procedures in terms of preserving cervical mobility and reducing postoperative complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9879003/ /pubmed/36713671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1065103 Text en © 2023 Zhong, Xu, Wang, Wu, Wu, Sun, Wang, Chen, Shen and Yuan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zhong, Huajian
Xu, Chen
Wang, Ruizhe
Wu, Xiaodong
Wu, Huiqiao
Sun, Baifeng
Wang, Xinwei
Chen, Huajiang
Shen, Xiaolong
Yuan, Wen
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title_full Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title_fullStr Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title_full_unstemmed Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title_short Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
title_sort anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1065103
work_keys_str_mv AT zhonghuajian anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT xuchen anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT wangruizhe anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT wuxiaodong anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT wuhuiqiao anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT sunbaifeng anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT wangxinwei anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT chenhuajiang anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT shenxiaolong anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy
AT yuanwen anteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionopendoorlaminoplastyorlaminectomywithfusionwhichisthebettertreatmentforfourlevelcervicalspondyloticmyelopathy