Cargando…

Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) offer a strategy for mobilising knowledge and integrating evidence-based interventions into musculoskeletal practice, yet little is known about their practical application in this context. This study aimed to (i) explore the process of knowledge mobilisatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaithes, Laura, Paskins, Zoe, Quicke, Jonathan G., Stevenson, Kay, Fell, Kathy, Dziedzic, Krysia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1
_version_ 1784878648747098112
author Swaithes, Laura
Paskins, Zoe
Quicke, Jonathan G.
Stevenson, Kay
Fell, Kathy
Dziedzic, Krysia
author_facet Swaithes, Laura
Paskins, Zoe
Quicke, Jonathan G.
Stevenson, Kay
Fell, Kathy
Dziedzic, Krysia
author_sort Swaithes, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) offer a strategy for mobilising knowledge and integrating evidence-based interventions into musculoskeletal practice, yet little is known about their practical application in this context. This study aimed to (i) explore the process of knowledge mobilisation in the context of a CoP to implement evidence-based interventions in musculoskeletal care and (ii) co-develop recommendations to optimise the process of knowledge mobilisation in CoPs. METHODS: A qualitative study comprising observation of a CoP and related planning meetings (n = 5), and interviews with CoP stakeholders (including clinicians, lay members, managers, commissioners, academics) (n = 15) was undertaken. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and interpreted considering the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services theory. Public contributors were collaboratively involved at key stages of the study. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: identifying and interpreting knowledge, practical implementation of a CoP, culture and relationship building, and responding to the external context. Resource and infrastructure enabled the set-up, delivery and running of the CoP. Support for lay members is recommended to ensure effective participation and equity of power. CoP aims and purpose can develop iteratively, and this may enhance the ability to respond to contextual changes. Several recommendations for the practical application of CoPs are suggested to create the best environment for knowledge exchange and creation, support an equitable platform for participation, and help members to navigate and make sense of the CoP in a flexible way. CONCLUSION: This study identified how a CoP with diverse membership can promote partnership working at the intersection between knowledge and practice. Several important considerations for preparing for and operationalising the approach in implementation have been identified. Evaluation of the costs, effectiveness and impact of CoPs is needed to better understand the value added by the approach. More broadly, research is needed to explore the practical application of online CoPs and the role of international CoPs in optimising the uptake of innovations and best practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98792362023-01-26 Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study Swaithes, Laura Paskins, Zoe Quicke, Jonathan G. Stevenson, Kay Fell, Kathy Dziedzic, Krysia Implement Sci Commun Research BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) offer a strategy for mobilising knowledge and integrating evidence-based interventions into musculoskeletal practice, yet little is known about their practical application in this context. This study aimed to (i) explore the process of knowledge mobilisation in the context of a CoP to implement evidence-based interventions in musculoskeletal care and (ii) co-develop recommendations to optimise the process of knowledge mobilisation in CoPs. METHODS: A qualitative study comprising observation of a CoP and related planning meetings (n = 5), and interviews with CoP stakeholders (including clinicians, lay members, managers, commissioners, academics) (n = 15) was undertaken. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and interpreted considering the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services theory. Public contributors were collaboratively involved at key stages of the study. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: identifying and interpreting knowledge, practical implementation of a CoP, culture and relationship building, and responding to the external context. Resource and infrastructure enabled the set-up, delivery and running of the CoP. Support for lay members is recommended to ensure effective participation and equity of power. CoP aims and purpose can develop iteratively, and this may enhance the ability to respond to contextual changes. Several recommendations for the practical application of CoPs are suggested to create the best environment for knowledge exchange and creation, support an equitable platform for participation, and help members to navigate and make sense of the CoP in a flexible way. CONCLUSION: This study identified how a CoP with diverse membership can promote partnership working at the intersection between knowledge and practice. Several important considerations for preparing for and operationalising the approach in implementation have been identified. Evaluation of the costs, effectiveness and impact of CoPs is needed to better understand the value added by the approach. More broadly, research is needed to explore the practical application of online CoPs and the role of international CoPs in optimising the uptake of innovations and best practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1. BioMed Central 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879236/ /pubmed/36703232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Swaithes, Laura
Paskins, Zoe
Quicke, Jonathan G.
Stevenson, Kay
Fell, Kathy
Dziedzic, Krysia
Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title_full Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title_fullStr Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title_short Optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in Communities of Practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
title_sort optimising the process of knowledge mobilisation in communities of practice: recommendations from a (multi-method) qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00384-1
work_keys_str_mv AT swaitheslaura optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy
AT paskinszoe optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy
AT quickejonathang optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy
AT stevensonkay optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy
AT fellkathy optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy
AT dziedzickrysia optimisingtheprocessofknowledgemobilisationincommunitiesofpracticerecommendationsfromamultimethodqualitativestudy