Cargando…

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramm, Lisa, Herber, Robert, Lorenz, Georg, Jasper, Carolin S., Pillunat, Lutz E., Pillunat, Karin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017
_version_ 1784878695642562560
author Ramm, Lisa
Herber, Robert
Lorenz, Georg
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
author_facet Ramm, Lisa
Herber, Robert
Lorenz, Georg
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
author_sort Ramm, Lisa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST (CST). Disease severity was functionally assessed by automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer) and structurally with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. To avoid a possible falsification by intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and age, which strongly influence ORA and CST measurements, group matching was performed. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to consider inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Following group matching, 60 eyes of 38 HPG and 103 eyes of 60 NPG patients were included. ORA measurement revealed a higher CRF in HPG than in NPG (P < 0.001). Additionally, the CST parameter integrated radius (P < 0.001) was significantly different between HPG and NPG. The parameter SSI (P < 0.001) representing corneal stiffness was higher in HPG than in NPG. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed associations between biomechanical parameters and indicators of disease severity. In HPG, SSI correlated to RNFL thickness. In NPG, dependencies between biomechanical readings and rim area, MD, and PSD were shown. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable between HPG and NPG patients which might indicate different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying in both entities. Moreover, biomechanical parameters correlated to functional and structural indices of diseases severity. A reduced corneal deformation measured by dynamic methods was associated to advanced glaucomatous damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98794662023-01-27 Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients Ramm, Lisa Herber, Robert Lorenz, Georg Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST (CST). Disease severity was functionally assessed by automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer) and structurally with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. To avoid a possible falsification by intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and age, which strongly influence ORA and CST measurements, group matching was performed. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to consider inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Following group matching, 60 eyes of 38 HPG and 103 eyes of 60 NPG patients were included. ORA measurement revealed a higher CRF in HPG than in NPG (P < 0.001). Additionally, the CST parameter integrated radius (P < 0.001) was significantly different between HPG and NPG. The parameter SSI (P < 0.001) representing corneal stiffness was higher in HPG than in NPG. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed associations between biomechanical parameters and indicators of disease severity. In HPG, SSI correlated to RNFL thickness. In NPG, dependencies between biomechanical readings and rim area, MD, and PSD were shown. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable between HPG and NPG patients which might indicate different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying in both entities. Moreover, biomechanical parameters correlated to functional and structural indices of diseases severity. A reduced corneal deformation measured by dynamic methods was associated to advanced glaucomatous damage. Public Library of Science 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879466/ /pubmed/36701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017 Text en © 2023 Ramm et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramm, Lisa
Herber, Robert
Lorenz, Georg
Jasper, Carolin S.
Pillunat, Lutz E.
Pillunat, Karin R.
Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title_full Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title_short Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
title_sort evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic scheimpflug-analyzer corvis st in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017
work_keys_str_mv AT rammlisa evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients
AT herberrobert evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients
AT lorenzgeorg evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients
AT jaspercarolins evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients
AT pillunatlutze evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients
AT pillunatkarinr evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients