Cargando…
Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients
PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017 |
_version_ | 1784878695642562560 |
---|---|
author | Ramm, Lisa Herber, Robert Lorenz, Georg Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. |
author_facet | Ramm, Lisa Herber, Robert Lorenz, Georg Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. |
author_sort | Ramm, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST (CST). Disease severity was functionally assessed by automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer) and structurally with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. To avoid a possible falsification by intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and age, which strongly influence ORA and CST measurements, group matching was performed. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to consider inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Following group matching, 60 eyes of 38 HPG and 103 eyes of 60 NPG patients were included. ORA measurement revealed a higher CRF in HPG than in NPG (P < 0.001). Additionally, the CST parameter integrated radius (P < 0.001) was significantly different between HPG and NPG. The parameter SSI (P < 0.001) representing corneal stiffness was higher in HPG than in NPG. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed associations between biomechanical parameters and indicators of disease severity. In HPG, SSI correlated to RNFL thickness. In NPG, dependencies between biomechanical readings and rim area, MD, and PSD were shown. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable between HPG and NPG patients which might indicate different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying in both entities. Moreover, biomechanical parameters correlated to functional and structural indices of diseases severity. A reduced corneal deformation measured by dynamic methods was associated to advanced glaucomatous damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9879466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98794662023-01-27 Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients Ramm, Lisa Herber, Robert Lorenz, Georg Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To characterize differences in corneal biomechanics in high (HPG) and normal pressure (NPG) primary open-angle glaucoma, and its association to disease severity. METHODS: Corneal biomechanical properties were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST (CST). Disease severity was functionally assessed by automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer) and structurally with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. To avoid a possible falsification by intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and age, which strongly influence ORA and CST measurements, group matching was performed. Linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations were used to consider inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Following group matching, 60 eyes of 38 HPG and 103 eyes of 60 NPG patients were included. ORA measurement revealed a higher CRF in HPG than in NPG (P < 0.001). Additionally, the CST parameter integrated radius (P < 0.001) was significantly different between HPG and NPG. The parameter SSI (P < 0.001) representing corneal stiffness was higher in HPG than in NPG. Furthermore, regression analysis revealed associations between biomechanical parameters and indicators of disease severity. In HPG, SSI correlated to RNFL thickness. In NPG, dependencies between biomechanical readings and rim area, MD, and PSD were shown. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable between HPG and NPG patients which might indicate different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying in both entities. Moreover, biomechanical parameters correlated to functional and structural indices of diseases severity. A reduced corneal deformation measured by dynamic methods was associated to advanced glaucomatous damage. Public Library of Science 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879466/ /pubmed/36701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017 Text en © 2023 Ramm et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ramm, Lisa Herber, Robert Lorenz, Georg Jasper, Carolin S. Pillunat, Lutz E. Pillunat, Karin R. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title_full | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title_short | Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic Scheimpflug-Analyzer Corvis ST in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
title_sort | evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the ocular response analyzer and the dynamic scheimpflug-analyzer corvis st in high pressure and normal pressure open-angle glaucoma patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rammlisa evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients AT herberrobert evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients AT lorenzgeorg evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients AT jaspercarolins evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients AT pillunatlutze evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients AT pillunatkarinr evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesusingtheocularresponseanalyzerandthedynamicscheimpfluganalyzercorvisstinhighpressureandnormalpressureopenangleglaucomapatients |