Cargando…

Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature

BACKGROUND: Cytolytic vaginosis (CV) is a little-known, controversial condition that is typically not considered for women presenting with vulvovaginitis symptoms. Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and compile the global evidence on CV. METHODS: A medical librarian sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraut, Roni, Carvallo, Fabiola Diaz, Golonka, Richard, Campbell, Sandra M., Rehmani, Anoush, Babenko, Oksana, Lee, Mao-Cheng, Vieira-Baptista, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280954
_version_ 1784878696424800256
author Kraut, Roni
Carvallo, Fabiola Diaz
Golonka, Richard
Campbell, Sandra M.
Rehmani, Anoush
Babenko, Oksana
Lee, Mao-Cheng
Vieira-Baptista, Pedro
author_facet Kraut, Roni
Carvallo, Fabiola Diaz
Golonka, Richard
Campbell, Sandra M.
Rehmani, Anoush
Babenko, Oksana
Lee, Mao-Cheng
Vieira-Baptista, Pedro
author_sort Kraut, Roni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytolytic vaginosis (CV) is a little-known, controversial condition that is typically not considered for women presenting with vulvovaginitis symptoms. Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and compile the global evidence on CV. METHODS: A medical librarian searched Prospero, Wiley Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, EBSCO CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Scopus, from inception to April 4, 2019 and updated to October 17, 2021. Studies were eligible if they discussed CV. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies were identified, with 67% of studies (n = 43) published since 2007. Studies were from around the world, including the United States (28%, n = 18), Brazil (11%, n = 7), Portugal (11%, n = 7), and China (11%, n = 7). Fifty percent of studies (n = 32) were reviews; the remainder were observational; and of these, 78% (n = 25) were cross-sectional. The most frequent topics included: diagnosis (19%, n = 12), prevalence (17%, n = 11), and overview of CV (50%, n = 32). Evidence for prevalence in symptomatic women (median prevalence of 5%, interquartile range 3%-8%) was based only on 16% of studies (n = 10) with minimal evidence on prevalence in asymptomatic women and across different geographic regions. Microbiological findings, including abundant lactobacilli and fragmented epithelial cells, were found useful to distinguish between CV and vulvovaginal candidiasis, and Lactobacillus crispatus was noted to dominate the vaginal flora in women with CV. Most studies used subjective criteria to diagnose CV as the condition lacks gold-standard microscopic criteria. The suggested primary treatment (baking soda irrigations) was largely based on expert opinion, and there was minimal evidence on associations between CV and other conditions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gaps currently exist in all realms of CV research. Additional research is needed to confirm the validity of CV and ensure that women are diagnosed and treated effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98794692023-01-27 Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature Kraut, Roni Carvallo, Fabiola Diaz Golonka, Richard Campbell, Sandra M. Rehmani, Anoush Babenko, Oksana Lee, Mao-Cheng Vieira-Baptista, Pedro PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cytolytic vaginosis (CV) is a little-known, controversial condition that is typically not considered for women presenting with vulvovaginitis symptoms. Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to identify and compile the global evidence on CV. METHODS: A medical librarian searched Prospero, Wiley Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, EBSCO CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and Scopus, from inception to April 4, 2019 and updated to October 17, 2021. Studies were eligible if they discussed CV. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: Sixty-four studies were identified, with 67% of studies (n = 43) published since 2007. Studies were from around the world, including the United States (28%, n = 18), Brazil (11%, n = 7), Portugal (11%, n = 7), and China (11%, n = 7). Fifty percent of studies (n = 32) were reviews; the remainder were observational; and of these, 78% (n = 25) were cross-sectional. The most frequent topics included: diagnosis (19%, n = 12), prevalence (17%, n = 11), and overview of CV (50%, n = 32). Evidence for prevalence in symptomatic women (median prevalence of 5%, interquartile range 3%-8%) was based only on 16% of studies (n = 10) with minimal evidence on prevalence in asymptomatic women and across different geographic regions. Microbiological findings, including abundant lactobacilli and fragmented epithelial cells, were found useful to distinguish between CV and vulvovaginal candidiasis, and Lactobacillus crispatus was noted to dominate the vaginal flora in women with CV. Most studies used subjective criteria to diagnose CV as the condition lacks gold-standard microscopic criteria. The suggested primary treatment (baking soda irrigations) was largely based on expert opinion, and there was minimal evidence on associations between CV and other conditions. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gaps currently exist in all realms of CV research. Additional research is needed to confirm the validity of CV and ensure that women are diagnosed and treated effectively. Public Library of Science 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879469/ /pubmed/36701339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280954 Text en © 2023 Kraut et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kraut, Roni
Carvallo, Fabiola Diaz
Golonka, Richard
Campbell, Sandra M.
Rehmani, Anoush
Babenko, Oksana
Lee, Mao-Cheng
Vieira-Baptista, Pedro
Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title_full Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title_fullStr Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title_short Scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
title_sort scoping review of cytolytic vaginosis literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280954
work_keys_str_mv AT krautroni scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT carvallofabioladiaz scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT golonkarichard scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT campbellsandram scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT rehmanianoush scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT babenkooksana scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT leemaocheng scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature
AT vieirabaptistapedro scopingreviewofcytolyticvaginosisliterature