Cargando…

Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature

Community teaching physicians (i.e., community preceptors) have assumed an important role in medical education. More than half of medical schools use community settings to train medical students. Whether community preceptors are well prepared for their teaching responsibilities is unknown. In additi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandraki, Irene, Baker, Russell, Kern, Anne, Beck Dallaghan, Gary L., Seegmiller, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5
_version_ 1784878718347378688
author Alexandraki, Irene
Baker, Russell
Kern, Anne
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Seegmiller, Jeffrey
author_facet Alexandraki, Irene
Baker, Russell
Kern, Anne
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Seegmiller, Jeffrey
author_sort Alexandraki, Irene
collection PubMed
description Community teaching physicians (i.e., community preceptors) have assumed an important role in medical education. More than half of medical schools use community settings to train medical students. Whether community preceptors are well prepared for their teaching responsibilities is unknown. In addition, best practice for faculty development (FD) of this population of preceptors has not been defined. The authors conducted a narrative review of the literature to describe FD programs for community preceptors that may be helpful to medical schools for future planning. Many databases were searched from their establishment to May 2022. Studies that described FD programs for community preceptors were included. Data were organized according to program aim, duration, setting, participants, content, and outcomes. The Communities of Practice theoretical framework was used to present findings. From a total of 6308 articles, 326 were eligible for full review, 21 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven percent (14/21) conducted a needs assessment; 57% (12/21) were developed by the medical school; 81% (17/21) included only community preceptors. Number of participants ranged from six to 1728. Workshops were often (24%, 5/21) used and supplemented by role-play, online modules, or instructional videos. Few programs offered opportunities to practice with standardized learners. Content focused primarily on teaching skills. Five programs offered CME credits as an incentive for engagement. Participant surveys were most often used for program evaluation. Learner evaluations and focus groups were used less often. Participants reported satisfaction and improvement in teaching skills after attending the program. Faculty development for community preceptors is primarily delivered through workshops and online materials, although direct observations of teaching with feedback from FD faculty and learners may be more helpful for training. Future studies need to focus on the long-term impact of FD on community preceptors’ teaching skills, identity formation as medical educators, and student learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9879558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98795582023-01-27 Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature Alexandraki, Irene Baker, Russell Kern, Anne Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Seegmiller, Jeffrey J Gen Intern Med Narrative Review Community teaching physicians (i.e., community preceptors) have assumed an important role in medical education. More than half of medical schools use community settings to train medical students. Whether community preceptors are well prepared for their teaching responsibilities is unknown. In addition, best practice for faculty development (FD) of this population of preceptors has not been defined. The authors conducted a narrative review of the literature to describe FD programs for community preceptors that may be helpful to medical schools for future planning. Many databases were searched from their establishment to May 2022. Studies that described FD programs for community preceptors were included. Data were organized according to program aim, duration, setting, participants, content, and outcomes. The Communities of Practice theoretical framework was used to present findings. From a total of 6308 articles, 326 were eligible for full review, 21 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven percent (14/21) conducted a needs assessment; 57% (12/21) were developed by the medical school; 81% (17/21) included only community preceptors. Number of participants ranged from six to 1728. Workshops were often (24%, 5/21) used and supplemented by role-play, online modules, or instructional videos. Few programs offered opportunities to practice with standardized learners. Content focused primarily on teaching skills. Five programs offered CME credits as an incentive for engagement. Participant surveys were most often used for program evaluation. Learner evaluations and focus groups were used less often. Participants reported satisfaction and improvement in teaching skills after attending the program. Faculty development for community preceptors is primarily delivered through workshops and online materials, although direct observations of teaching with feedback from FD faculty and learners may be more helpful for training. Future studies need to focus on the long-term impact of FD on community preceptors’ teaching skills, identity formation as medical educators, and student learning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-26 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9879558/ /pubmed/36701025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Alexandraki, Irene
Baker, Russell
Kern, Anne
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L.
Seegmiller, Jeffrey
Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title_full Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title_short Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature
title_sort faculty development for community preceptors: a narrative review of the literature
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36701025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrakiirene facultydevelopmentforcommunitypreceptorsanarrativereviewoftheliterature
AT bakerrussell facultydevelopmentforcommunitypreceptorsanarrativereviewoftheliterature
AT kernanne facultydevelopmentforcommunitypreceptorsanarrativereviewoftheliterature
AT beckdallaghangaryl facultydevelopmentforcommunitypreceptorsanarrativereviewoftheliterature
AT seegmillerjeffrey facultydevelopmentforcommunitypreceptorsanarrativereviewoftheliterature