Cargando…
Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: The Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was developed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to replace the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) for UK general practice licensing. Our aim was to evaluate examiner perceptions of the RCA. METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional design using a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04027-4 |
_version_ | 1784878718587502592 |
---|---|
author | Botan, Vanessa Laparidou, Despina Phung, Viet-Hai Cheung, Peter Freeman, Adrian Wakeford, Richard Denney, Meiling Law, Graham R. Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan |
author_facet | Botan, Vanessa Laparidou, Despina Phung, Viet-Hai Cheung, Peter Freeman, Adrian Wakeford, Richard Denney, Meiling Law, Graham R. Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan |
author_sort | Botan, Vanessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was developed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to replace the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) for UK general practice licensing. Our aim was to evaluate examiner perceptions of the RCA. METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey of RCA examiners with attitudinal (relating to examiners thoughts and perceptions of the RCA) and free text response options. We conducted statistical descriptive and factor analysis of quantitative data with qualitative thematic analysis of free text responses. RESULTS: Overall, 182 of 260 (70%) examiners completed the questionnaire. Responders felt that consultations submitted were representative of the work of a typical GP during the pandemic and provided a good sample across the curriculum. They were also generally positive about the logistic, advisory and other support provided as well as the digital platform. Despite responders generally agreeing there was sufficient information available in video or audio consultations to judge candidates’ data gathering, clinical management, and interpersonal skills, they were less confident about their ability to make judgments of candidates’ performance compared with the CSA. The qualitative analysis of free text responses detailed the problems of case selection and content, explained examiners’ difficulties when making judgments, and detailed the generally positive views about support, training and information technology. Responders also provided helpful recommendations for improving the assessment. CONCLUSION: The RCA was considered by examiners to be feasible and broadly acceptable, although they experienced challenges from candidate case selection, case content and judgments leading to suggested areas for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04027-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9879559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98795592023-01-27 Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study Botan, Vanessa Laparidou, Despina Phung, Viet-Hai Cheung, Peter Freeman, Adrian Wakeford, Richard Denney, Meiling Law, Graham R. Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was developed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to replace the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) for UK general practice licensing. Our aim was to evaluate examiner perceptions of the RCA. METHODS: We employed a cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey of RCA examiners with attitudinal (relating to examiners thoughts and perceptions of the RCA) and free text response options. We conducted statistical descriptive and factor analysis of quantitative data with qualitative thematic analysis of free text responses. RESULTS: Overall, 182 of 260 (70%) examiners completed the questionnaire. Responders felt that consultations submitted were representative of the work of a typical GP during the pandemic and provided a good sample across the curriculum. They were also generally positive about the logistic, advisory and other support provided as well as the digital platform. Despite responders generally agreeing there was sufficient information available in video or audio consultations to judge candidates’ data gathering, clinical management, and interpersonal skills, they were less confident about their ability to make judgments of candidates’ performance compared with the CSA. The qualitative analysis of free text responses detailed the problems of case selection and content, explained examiners’ difficulties when making judgments, and detailed the generally positive views about support, training and information technology. Responders also provided helpful recommendations for improving the assessment. CONCLUSION: The RCA was considered by examiners to be feasible and broadly acceptable, although they experienced challenges from candidate case selection, case content and judgments leading to suggested areas for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04027-4. BioMed Central 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9879559/ /pubmed/36703159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04027-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Botan, Vanessa Laparidou, Despina Phung, Viet-Hai Cheung, Peter Freeman, Adrian Wakeford, Richard Denney, Meiling Law, Graham R. Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title | Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title_full | Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title_short | Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study |
title_sort | examiner perceptions of the mrcgp recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during covid-19: cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36703159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04027-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT botanvanessa examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT laparidoudespina examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT phungviethai examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT cheungpeter examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT freemanadrian examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT wakefordrichard examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT denneymeiling examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT lawgrahamr examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy AT siriwardenaaloysiusniroshan examinerperceptionsofthemrcgprecordedconsultationassessmentforgeneralpracticelicensingduringcovid19crosssectionalstudy |